Case law

Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Briggs

268 N.C. 158 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1966

G.S. 40-19; Topping v. Board of Education, 249 N.C. 291 , 106 S.E. 2d 502 . … Applying the rule established in Winston-Salem v.

Fisher v. Flue-Cured Tobacco Cooperative Stabilization Corp.

369 N.C. 202 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 21, 2016

Specifically, defendant contends that one named plaintiff and class representative, Richard Renegar, is on defendant’s Board of Directors. … , Renegar “effectively” contradicts Board decisions for which he “consistently voted in favor.”

Russell v. Carolina Central R. R.

118 N.C. 1098 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1896

Hinkle v. Railroad, 109 N. C., 472 ; Randall v. Railroad, 104 N. C., 410 ; Gilmore v. Railroad, 115 N. C., 657 . … Morgan v. Lewis, 95 N. C., 296 ; Brown v Calloway, 90 N. C., 118 . While we see no error in the instruction given in relation to the third issue, it is not material to discuss it.

Boyd v. . Hawkins

17 N.C. 195 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1832

(Coles v. Trecotrick. 9 Ves. 246. Fox v. Macreath, 2 Bro. C. C. 400.) … (Lord Chesterfield v. Jansen, 2 Ves. 146.)

Whitaker v. Garren

167 N.C. 658 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1914

Parker v. Taylor, 133 N. C., 105 ; Davis v. Wall, 142 N. C., 452 ; Woody v. Fountain, 143 N. C., 70; Green v. Williams, 144 N. C., 63 ; Brown v. Hutchison, 155 N. C., 206 . … Gillam v. Edmonson, 154 N. C., 127 ; Tyler v. Capehart, 125 N. C., 64 ; Tuttle v. Harrell, 85 N. C., 456 ; Fayerweather v. Ritch, 195 U. S., 277 ; Aurora City v. West, 75 U. S., 82, 103 ; Chamberlain v.

Hall v. . Cottingham

124 N.C. 402 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 11, 1899

These questions have been fully considered in tbe case of Brown v. Nimocks at this term, and tbe principles therein laid down govern tbe case at bar.

Bumgardner v. Allison

238 N.C. 621 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 25, 1953

Also the record discloses that Patrolman Brown, testifying in respect to a conversation he had with Barger, said, in part, that Barger told him: “he was going over this dip and went down the dip to Second Avenue and that … See also: McClamrock v. Packing Co., post, 648; Price v. Monroe, 234 N.C. 666 , 68 S.E. 2d 283 ; Barber v. Wooten, 234 N.C. 107 , 66 S.E. 2d 690 ; Hall v. Coble Dairies, supra ( 234 N.C. 206 ); Chaffin v.

Merchants National Bank v. Pack

178 N.C. 388 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 29, 1919

Johnson v. R. R., 140 N. C., 581 ; Keerans v. Brown, 68 N. C., 43 ; Edwards v. Sullivan, 30 N. C., 302 ; S. v. McLeod, 8 N. C., 344 . And such evidence may also be used for the purpose of corroboration. Allred v. … Cox v. Wall, 132 N. C., 730 ; Morgan v. Bostic, 132 N. C., 743 ; Crockett v. Bray, 151 N. C., 619 ; Eddleman v. Lentz, 158 N. C., 65 ; Pennell v. Robinson, 164 N. C., 257 ; Smathers v. Hotel Co., 168 N.

Godwin v. Hinnant

250 N.C. 328 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1959

White v. Price, 237 N.C. 347 , 75 S.E. 2d 244 ; Dunn v. Marks, 141 N.C. 232 ; Timber Co. v. Butler, 134 N.C. 50 ; Kerr v. Hicks, 131 N.C. 90 ; Gilchrist v. Kitchen, 86 N.C. 20 . … Bartlett v. Hopkins, 235 N.C. 165 , 69 S.E. 2d 236 ; Brown v. Clement Co., 217 N.C. 47 , 6 S.E. 2d 842 ; Gurganus v. McLawhorn, 212 N.C. 397 , 193 S.E. 844 ; Cotton Mills v.

Jones v. Commissioners of Granville

77 N.C. 280 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1877

He also alleges that he believes that it is the “intention and purpose ” of the defendant, the Board of Commissioners, to-qualify and induct one Manly B. … Patterson v. Hubbs, 65 N. C. 119 . The plaintiff does say, he believes the defendant M. B.

Davis v. Southern Railway Co.

147 N.C. 68 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 11, 1908

The long-settled practice is thus summed up by Brown, J., in a recent case (Clark v. Traction Co., 138 N.

Wall v. City of Asheville

219 N.C. 163 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 26, 1941

Russell v. Town of Monroe, 116 N. C., 720 ; *169 Dillon v. Raleigh, 124 N. C., 184 (188-189) ; Fitzgerald v. Concord, 140 N. C., 110 ; Brown v. Durham, 141 N. C., 249 ; Bailey v. Winston, 157 N. C., 252 ; Alexander v. … C., 527 (533); Darden v. Plymouth, 166 N. C., 492 ; Graham v. Charlotte, 186 N. C., 649 ; Goldstein v. R. R., 188 N. C., 636 ; Willis v. New Bern, 191 N. C., 507 (511); Speas v. Greensboro, 204 N. C., 239 ; Gasque v.

State v. McCray

342 N.C. 123 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1995

State v. Brown, 315 N.C. 40, 59 , 337 S.E.2d 808, 822-23 (1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1164 , 90 L. Ed. 2d 733 (1986), overruled on other grounds by State v. Vandiver, 321 N.C. 570 , 364 S.E.2d 373 (1988). … State v. Brown, 306 N.C. 151, 174 , 293 S.E.2d 569, 584 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1080 , 74 L. Ed. 2d 642 (1982).

Daniel v. . Hodges

87 N.C. 95 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1882

In Baird v. Baird, Phil. … In Isler v. Brown, 66 N. C., 556 , which was a motion to-issue a vend ex., and the land sought to be sold was aliened ponding the consideration of the motion ; it was held the rule of Us pendens applied.

State v. Gurley

253 N.C. 55 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1960

S. v. Phelps, 242 N.C. 540 , 89 S.E. 2d 132 ; S. v. Norris, *57 242 N.C. 47 , 86 S.E. 2d 916 ; S. v. Wooten, 228 N.C. 628 , 46 S.E. 2d 868 ; S. v. Cope, supra. In S. v. … S. v. Brown, 250 N.C. 209 , 108 S.E. 2d 233 .

Collins v. Emerson

236 N.C. 297 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 8, 1952

It has been repeatedly held by this Court that when the Legislature has committed to a board the duty of submitting a proposition to the voters, in an area in which such board has jurisdiction, when such duty has been discharged … Smallwood v. New Bern, 90 N.C. 36 ; McDowell v. Construction Co., 96 N.C. 514 , 2 S.E. 351 ; S. v. Emery, 98 N.C. 768 , 3 S.E. 810 ; Rigsbee v. Durham, 98 N.C. 81 , 3 S.E. 749 ; Bynum v.

State v. Thomas

344 N.C. 639 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 8, 1996

In State v. … State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179 , 358 S.E.2d 1 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L. Ed. 2d 406 (1987). State v. Howell, 335 N.C. 457, 471 , 439 S.E.2d 116, 124 (1994).

State v. . Earnhardt

170 N.C. 725 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 17, 1915

Wood v. U.S. , 16 Peters, 342 ; Bernier v. Bernier , 147 U.S. 242 ; Smythe v. Fiske , 23 Wall., 374 ; Fortune v. Comrs. , 140 N.C. 322 ; McLeod v. Comrs. , 148 N.C. 85 . … Endlich on Int. of Statutes, 258 and note, 264 and 267; U.S. v. Freeman , 3 How., 556 ; Hurdekoper v. Douglass , 3 Cranche, 1; Hawaii v. Mankiche , 190 U.S. 197 ; U.S. v. Kirby , 7 Wall., 482 ; Oates v. First Natl.

Simpson v. Plyler

258 N.C. 390 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 11, 1963

Ramsey v. Camp, supra; Holland v. Utilities Co., supra; Brown v. R.R., 208 N.C. 423 , 181 S.E. 279 ; Slade v. Sherrod, 175 N.C. 346 , 95 S.E. 557 . … Brown v. R.R., supra; Lewis v. Johnson, 86 P. 2d 99 (Cal. 1939); 124 A.L.R. 1315 . In Battle v.

Powell v. . Matthis

26 N.C. 83 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1843

Cowel v Edwards, 2 Bos. & Pul. 268. … Browne v Lee, 6 Barn. & Cres. 689. In this State, however, the doctrine has been the subject of legislation, in the act of 1807, Rev.