Case law

Seaboard Air Line Railroad v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

237 N.C. 88 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 30, 1953

Hospital v. Wilmington, 235 N.C. 597 , 70 S.E. 2d 833 ; Board of Trade v. Tobacco Co., 235 N.C. 737 , 71 S.E. 2d 21 ; Arey v. Lemons, 232 N.C. 531 , 61 S.E. 2d 596 ; Jackson v. … Moss Industries, Inc., v. Irving Metals Co., Inc., 140 N. J. Eq. 484; Board of Trade v. Tobacco Co., supra.

State v. Joyner

286 N.C. 366 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1975

As stated in Keiger v. Board of Adjustment, 278 N.C. 17 , 178 S.E. 2d 616 (1971) : “The original zoning power of the State reposes in the General Assembly. Marren v. Gamble, 237 N.C. 680 , 75 S.E. 2d 880 . … Board of Commissioners of Shawnee County, 181 Kan. 1008 , 317 P. 2d 798 (1957) ; and one-year limitations, *375 Standard Oil Company v. Tallahassee, supra; McKinney v.

Colonial Trust Co. v. Sterchie Bros.

169 N.C. 21 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1915

Gaylord v. Gaylord has been cited with approval in Newkirk v. Stevens, 152 N. C., 502 ; Dunlap v. Willett, 153 N. C., 321 ; by Brown, J., in Ricks v. Wilson, 154 N. C., 286 ; Weaver v. Weaver, 159 N. C., 21 ; Jones v. … Tarboro v. Hicks, 118 N. C., 163 ; Bostic v. Young, 116 N. C., 766 ; Francis v. Herron, 101 N. C., 497 . In Quinnerly v.

Kennedy v. Town of Wilkesboro

214 N.C. 271 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1938

E., 665 ; and Wilkesboro v. Jordan, 212 N. C., 197 , 193 S. E., 155 . … Baker v. Hobgood, 126 N. C., 149 , 35 S. E., 253 ; Smith v. Carolina Beach, 206 N. C., 834 , 175 S. E., 313 . Judgment affirmed.

Armour Fertilizer Works v. Cox

187 N.C. 654 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 30, 1924

Cox v. R. R., 123 N. C., 604, 611 ; Board of Education v. Makely, 139 N. C., 31, 38; Smith v. Holmes, 167 N. C., 561 ; S. v. Murphrey, 186 N. C., 113 ; S. v. Loftin, ibid., 205.

Cook v. . Guirkin

119 N.C. 13 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1896

Helms v. Green, 105 N. C., 251 ; Bonham v. Craig, 80 N. C., 224 . … State v. Morrison, 3 Dev., 299 ; State v. Emery, 98 N. C., 668 ; Helms v. Green, supra, at p. 263 ; Bank v. Bridgers, 114 N. C., 383 ; 1 Rice on Civil Evidence, Sec. 77 ; Brown v. Mitchell, 102 N. C., 347 ; Rice Cr.

Robinson v. . Robinson

123 N.C. 136 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 25, 1898

.: The plaintiff institutes this action for divorce from bed and board, and, before filing her *137 complaint, she files affidavits and asks the Court for an injunction restraining her husband from interfering with her separate … Manning v. Manning, 79 N. C., 293 ; Cecil v. Smith, 81 N. C., 285 . And the wife is entitled to recover her separate property and also the income derived therefrom. Manning v. Manning, supra.

Charlotte v. . Kavanaugh

221 N.C. 259 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 6, 1942

Rogers v. U.S. , 185 U.S. 83 ; Wilson v. Comrs. , 183 N.C. 638 ; Alexander v. Lowrance , 182 N.C. 642 ; Bramham v. Durham , 171 N.C. 196 ; S. v. Johnson , 170 N.C. 688 ; Cecil v. … Asheville, supra , the Court said: "The assessment and levy by the board of aldermen in this case had the effect of a judgment and lien." A judgment, unless renewed, is barred in ten years. The case of Statesville v.

Hobbs v. Atlantic & North Carolina Railroad

107 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1890

R., 67 Ala., 206 ; Railroad v. Henderson, 15 Lea (Tenn.), 423; Henry v. Railroad, 49 Mich., 495 ; Pauline v. Railroad, 34 N. J. L., 151; Railroad v. Elliott, 1 Col., 611 ; Jones v. Yeager, 2 Dill, 64 ; Caldwell v. … Brown, 53 Pa. St., 453 ; Railroad v. Rush, 15 Lea, 145 ; Railroad v. Waller, 48 Ala., *3 459; Howard v. Denver R. R., 26 Fed. Rep., 837; Gulf R. R. v. Blohn, 73 Tex., 637 (1889), and there are many others. In Dobbin v.

Everett v. . Station

192 N.C. 221 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 29, 1926

Caldwell v. Robinson, 179 N. C., 518 ; Wall v. Rothrock, 171 N. C., 388 . … Bispham’s Equity (6 ed.), secs. 335 and 336; Whitford v. Lane, 190 N. C., 343 ; Joyner v. Reflector Co., 176 N. C., 274 ; Brown v. Harding, 170 N. C., 253 . There is no error upon defendant’s appeal.

State v. Rose

251 N.C. 281 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 25, 1959

Cole, 249 N.C. 733 , 107 S.E. 2d 732 ; S. v. Hoffman, 199 N.C. 328 , 154 S.E. 314 ; S. v. Hughes, 72 N.C. 25 ; S. v. Stalcup, 23 N.C. 30 . … S. v. Brown, 249 N.C. 271 , 106 S.E. 2d 232 ; Gibson v. Whitton, 239 N.C. 11 , 79 S.E. 2d 196 ; S. v. Rogers, 233 N.C. 390 , 64 S.E. 2d 572 ; S. v. Litteral, 227 N.C. 527 , 43 S.E. 2d 84 ; S. v.

Radio Station WMFR, Inc. v. Eitel-McCullough, Inc.

232 N.C. 287 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 9, 1950

Matthews v. Fry, 143 N.C. 384 , 55 S.E. 787 ; Cox v. Boyden, 175 N.C. 368 , 95 S.E. 548 ; Tyer v. Lumber Co., 188 N.C. 268 , 124 S.E. 305 ; Tinker v. Rice Motors, Inc., 198 N.C. 73 , 150 S.E. 701 ; Lumber Co. v. … Finance Co., 204 N.C. 285 , 168 S.E. 219 ; Brown v. Coal Co., 208 N.C. 50 , 178 S.E. 858 . Eut this principle does not preclude the review of inferences or conclusions of law. Power Co. v.

N.C. Dep't of Env't Quality v. N.C. Farm Bureau Fed'n, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 17, 2025

See generally Brown v. Kindred Nursing Ctrs. … by its reference to the Board’s authority to set “rules and regulations”); State Acupuncture Licensing Bd. v.

Wingler v. . Miller

221 N.C. 137 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 25, 1942

Bank v. Angelo, 193 N. C., 576 , 137 S. E., 705 ; Mills v. Bank, 208 N. C., 674 , 182 S. E., 336 ; Ellis v. Brown, 217 N. C., 787 , 9 S. E. (2d), 467 . … Wilkesboro v. Jordan, 212 N. C., 197 , 193 S. E., 155 ; Holland v. Whittington, 215 N. C., 330 , 1 S. E. (2d), 813 ; Burleson v. Burleson, 217 N. C., 336 , 7 S. E. (2d), 706 .

Powell v. . Stone

4 N.C. 241 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1815

The cause was argued at a former term by Browne for the defendant, and at this term by Nash for the plaintiff. It is to be decided whether an action can be sustained upon the facts stated in the declaration. … Cited: Hathaway v. Hinton , 46 N.C. 246 ; Gordon v. Baxter , 74 N.C. 472 ; Durham v. Cotton Mills , 144 N.C. 711 ; Hudson v. McArthur , 152 N.C. 455 ; Pruitt v. Bethel , 174 N.C. 456 . Dist.: Mfg. Co. v. R.

Gray v. . R. R.

167 N.C. 433 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1914

BROWN, J., dissenting; WALKER, J., concurring in the dissenting opinion. … Ray v. R. R. , 141 N.C. 87 ; Farris v. R. R. , 151 N.C. 491 ; Edge v. R. R. , 153 N.C. 216 ; R. R. v. Ives , 144 U.S. 408 . No error.

Fisher v. Flue-Cured Tobacco Cooperative Stabilization Corp.

369 N.C. 202 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 21, 2016

Specifically, defendant contends that one named plaintiff and class representative, Richard Renegar, is on defendant’s Board of Directors. … , Renegar “effectively” contradicts Board decisions for which he “consistently voted in favor.”

Boyd v. . Hawkins

17 N.C. 195 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1832

(Coles v. Trecotrick. 9 Ves. 246. Fox v. Macreath, 2 Bro. C. C. 400.) … (Lord Chesterfield v. Jansen, 2 Ves. 146.)

Whitaker v. Garren

167 N.C. 658 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1914

Parker v. Taylor, 133 N. C., 105 ; Davis v. Wall, 142 N. C., 452 ; Woody v. Fountain, 143 N. C., 70; Green v. Williams, 144 N. C., 63 ; Brown v. Hutchison, 155 N. C., 206 . … Gillam v. Edmonson, 154 N. C., 127 ; Tyler v. Capehart, 125 N. C., 64 ; Tuttle v. Harrell, 85 N. C., 456 ; Fayerweather v. Ritch, 195 U. S., 277 ; Aurora City v. West, 75 U. S., 82, 103 ; Chamberlain v.

Hall v. . Cottingham

124 N.C. 402 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 11, 1899

These questions have been fully considered in tbe case of Brown v. Nimocks at this term, and tbe principles therein laid down govern tbe case at bar.