Case law

State v. Watkins

164 N.C. 425 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 22, 1913

In S. v. … Under the authority of the concurring opinion of Walker, J., and the dissenting opinion of Brown, J., in S. v.

Slade v. . Sherrod

175 N.C. 346 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 1918

Howard v. Plumbing Co., 154 N. C., 224 . … In Howard v. Plumbing Co., supra, it is held: “Therefore, if be accepts tbe satisfaction voluntarily made by one, that is a bar to all.

Kivett v. . Telegraph Co.

156 N.C. 296 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 18, 1911

Wilson v. Taylor , 154 N.C. 215 .. … Cited: Alexander v. Telegraph Co. , 158 N.C. 478 ; Penn v. Telegraph Co. , 159 N.C. 309 ; Miller v. Telegraph Co. , 167 N.C. 316 ; Medlin v. Telegraph Co. , 169 N.C. 505 . *Page 248

State v. . Allen

222 N.C. 145 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 14, 1942

S. v. Hildreth, 31 N. C., 429 ; S. v. Smarr, 121 N. C., 669 , 28 S. E., 549 ; S. v. Shipman, 202 N. C., 518 , 163 S. E., 657 ; S. v. Godwin, supra. … S. v. Cade, 215 N. C., 393 , 2 S. E. (2d), 7 ; S. v. Hammonds, 216 N. C., 67 , 3 S. E. (2d), 439 ; S. v. Brown, 218 N. C., 415 , 11 S. E. (2d), 321 .

Gettys v. Town of Marion

218 N.C. 266 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 9, 1940

Alexander v. Statesville, 165 N. C., 527 , 81 S. E., 763 ; Brown v. Durham, 141 N. C., 252 ; Revis v. Raleigh, 150 N. C., 348 , 63 S. E., 1049 ; Johnson v. Raleigh, 156 N. C., 269 , 72 S. E., 368 ; Bailey v. … Asheville, supra; City of Wichita Falls v. Lipscombe, 50 S. E. (2d), 867 (Tex.); Gatz v. City of Kerrville, 36 S. W. (2d), 277 (Tex.); Carvin v. St. Louis, 52 S. W., 210 (Mo.); Atlanta v. Hampton, 77 S.

Sydnor v. . Boyd

119 N.C. 481 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1896

Walker v. Long, 109 N. C., 510 ; Osborne v. Wilkes, 108 N. C., 651 ; Woodruff v. Bowles, 104 N. C., 197 ; Battle v. Mayo 102 N. C., 347 ; Brown v. Mitchell, 102 N. C., 347 ; George v. High, 85 N. C., 99 . … Blachburn v. Insurance Co., 116 N. C., 821 .

Jones v. City of New Bern

152 N.C. 64 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 2, 1910

There are three objections made to the validity of the bond issue authorized by the ordinance of the board of *65 aldermen of the defendant city: (1) That the ordinance was not ratified by a majority of the qualified voters … CII, sec. 4; Burgin v. Smith, 151 N. C., 566 .

Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Gill

293 N.C. 164 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 23, 1977

Young v. Insurance Co., 267 N.C. 339 , 148 S.E. 2d 226 (1966). … Lacy v. Indemnity Co., 189 N.C. 24 , 126 S.E. 316 (1925).

State v. McKnight

279 N.C. 148 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 10, 1971

Brown, an employee of the Charlotte Fire Department, on 6 March 1970 heard two gunshots at approximately 9:30 p.m. … State v. Hill, 272 N.C. 439 , 158 S.E. 2d 329 ; State v. Bogan, 266 N.C. 99 , 145 S.E. 2d 374 ; State v. Stephens, 244 N.C. 380 , 93 S.E. 2d 431 . As said by Justice Higgins in State v.

Hendrix v. Cotton Mills.

138 N.C. 169 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 18, 1905

Brown, J. … In Edwards v. Railroad, 129 N.

Berry v. . Payne

219 N.C. 171 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 26, 1941

See, also, Van Amringe v. Taylor, 108 N. C., 196 , 12 S. E., 1005 ; Hughes v. Long, 119 N. C., 52 , 25 S. E., 743 ; Rodwell v. Rowland, 137 N. C., 617 , 50 S. E., 319 ; Whitehead v. Pittman, 165 N. C., 89 , 80 S. … Barnes v. Lewis, 73 N. C., 138 ; Vass v. Riddick, 89 N. C., 6 ; Bank v. Liles, 197 N. C., 413 (418) ; Bank v. Clark, 198 N. C., 169 (173); Lightner v. Knights of King Solomon, 199 N. C., 525 (528).” Warehouse Co. v.

Reid v. Hans Rees' Sons Co.

155 N.C. 230 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 17, 1911

The rule as thus stated was approved in Avery v. Lumber Co., 146 N. C., 595 ; Cotton v. R. R., 149 N. C., 227 ; Nail v. Brown, 150 N. C., 533 ; West v. Tanning Co., 154 N. C., 44 ; Mercer v. R. R., at this term. … In Pressly v.

Link v. . Link

90 N.C. 235 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1884

Kelly v. Bryan, 6 Ired. Eq., 283 ; Clement v. Clement, 1 Jones’ Eq., 184; Briggs v. Morris, Ib., 193; Brown v. Carsons, Executor, Busb. Eq., 272; Briant v. Corpening, Phil. Eq., 325; Bonham v. Craig, 80 N. … In addition to Mulholland v. York, supra, we refer to Shields v. Whitaker, 82 N. C., 516 ; Cheek v. Watson, 85 N. C., 195 ; Gidney v. Moore, 86 N. C., 484 .

Markham v. Duke Land & Improvement Co.

201 N.C. 117 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1931

Jones v. Greensboro, 124 N. C., 310 ; Fitzgerald v. Concord,, 140 N. C., 110 ; Brown v. Durham, 141 N. C., 249 ; Kinsey v. Kinston, *121 145 N. C., 106 ; Revis v. Raleigh, 150 N. C., 348 ; Bailey v. Winston, 157 N. … Rucker v. Willey, 174 N. C., 42 ; 36 C. J., 245.

Powell v. . Stone

4 N.C. 241 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1815

The cause was argued at a former term by Browne for the defendant, and at this term by Nash for the plaintiff. It is to be decided whether an action can be sustained upon the facts stated in the declaration. … Cited: Hathaway v. Hinton , 46 N.C. 246 ; Gordon v. Baxter , 74 N.C. 472 ; Durham v. Cotton Mills , 144 N.C. 711 ; Hudson v. McArthur , 152 N.C. 455 ; Pruitt v. Bethel , 174 N.C. 456 . Dist.: Mfg. Co. v. R.

American Clipper Corp. v. Howerton

311 N.C. 151 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1984

In Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. … Stewart v. Brown, 546 S.W. 2d 204, 206 (Mo. App. 1977). The transaction between Clipper and Adventure most nearly resembles a consignment.

State v. Cortez

717 S.E.2d 573 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 25, 2011

717 S.E.2d 573 (2011) STATE of North Carolina v. Elder G. CORTEZ, defendant and Richard L. Lowry, Surety, and Larry D. Atkinson, Surety, and Tony L. Barnes, Surety. No. 200P11. Supreme Court of North Carolina. … Rod Malone, Raleigh, for Johnston County Board of Education. Paul T. Jackson, Assistant District Attorney, for State of North Carolina. John P. O'Hale, Benson, for Lowry, Richard L., et al.

Norfolk Southern Railroad v. Town of Morehead City

167 N.C. 118 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 28, 1914

R. v. … R. v. Goldsboro, supra; Crawford v. Marion, 154 N. C., 74 ; S. v. R. R., 145 N.

Anderson v. Cashion

265 N.C. 555 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1965

Rubber Co. v. Distributors, 253 N.C. 459 , 117 S.E. 2d 479 . … G.S. 1-185; Wynne v. Allen, 245 N.C. 421 , 96 S.E. 2d 422 . The verdict and judgment are vacated and there will be a New trial.

Hyman v. . Cain

48 N.C. 111 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1855

In the case of Richardson v. Strong, 13 Ire. … The cases of Hussey v. Rountree, Bus. Rep. 110, and State v. Cook, 12 Ire.