Case law

Bonnett-Brown Corporation v. . Coble

195 N.C. 491 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 18, 1928

In Bush v. … Mills v. Duryee, supra, and annotation in 3 L. Ed., 412 ; Priest v. Board of Trustees, 232 U. S., 604 , 58 L. Ed., 750 ; Baker v. Baker 242 U. S., 394 , 61 L. Ed., 386 ; Arrington v. Arrington, 127 N. C., 190 ; Irby v.

Board of Comm'rs v. Board of Comm'rs

70 N.C. 657 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1874

The question in this case is -the sameas in Steele v. Commissioners of Rutherford County, ante 137, at this term, and the decision is the same, and for the same reason. … The Board of Commissioners of a county must be sued in the county of which they are Commissioners. There is no error. Per Curiam:. Judgment affirmed.

Board of Education v. . Board of Commissioners

172 N.C. 861 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 29, 1916

Brown v. . Assurance Society

210 N.C. 825 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 29, 1936

Brown, now deceased. The plaintiff's claim to the proceeds of said policy was based upon an allegation and contention that a purported assignment of the policy to Louis A. … Hayes v. Hickory , 208 N.C. 845 , and cases there cited. Affirmed. CLARKSON, J., not sitting. *Page 826

Brown v. Southeastern Express Co.

192 N.C. 25 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 27, 1926

In Hosiery Co. v. Express Co., 184 N. … Co. v. R. R., 121 N. C., 514 ; Hinkle v. R. R., 126 N. C., 937 . The plaintiff introduced in evidence an express receipt issued by the defendant, as follows: “1-17-24. “Mr. R. H. Brown, “Andrews, N. C.

Board of Education v. State Board of Education

217 N.C. 90 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 2, 1940

Code, 1935 (Michie), sec. 5683, provides: “Loans by State Board from State Literary Fund. … Tbe loan was approved by tbe defendant, State Board of Education, on 21 June, 1939, during tbe fiscal year in wbicb tbe money could be borrowed under tbe Constitution, Art. V, sec. 4.

Brown v. Kinston Manufacturing Co.

175 N.C. 201 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 13, 1918

work would not have been hazardous, and if due care, which is ordinary care, had been exercised by the defendant, the injury would not have- *203 resulted, and this brings tbe ease fairly witbin the rule stated in Cochran v. … Johnson v. R. R., 163 N. C., 431, 453 . No error.

Brown v. Catawba Lumber Co.

117 N.C. 287 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1895

recover for a breach by the defendant of a mutual agreement theretofore made between them, by the terms of which the defendant *295 was to pay the plaintiff, as bandsawyer at its mill according to the number of feet of boards … Allen v. Sallinger, 105 N. C., 339: Turrentine v. Railroad, 92 N. C., 612 ; Porter v. Railroad, 97 N. C., 66 ; Mitchell v. Brown, 88 N. C., 156 .

Brown v. City of Burlington

366 N.C. 409 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 2012

Trull and Brown v. . the Bd. of Com. of Madison Co.

72 N.C. 388 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1875

State v. Commissioners of Craven, 70 N. C. Rep., 644 ; Maury v. Commissioners of Montgomery, 71 N. C. Rep., 486 .

Brown v. O'Toole

337 N.C. 686 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 9, 1994

Pursuant to Hargett v. Holland, 337 N.C. 651 , 447 S.E.2d 784 (1994), the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. REVERSED.

Harvey Blair & Co. v. Brown

116 N.C. 631 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1895

Y., 446 ; Smith v. Eastern, 54 Md., 138 . In response to plaintiff’s *640 prayer for instructions His Honor among other things charged the jury as follows : 1. … The doctrine laid down in Stone v. Marshall, 7 Jones, 300 , was overruled by Morris v. Pear son, 79 N. C., 253 . There is error also in His Honor’s having given No. 11 of plaintiff’s prayer for instruction.

Brown v. Burlington Industries, Inc.

325 N.C. 270 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 6, 1989

Brown v. Hodges

230 N.C. 746 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 19, 1949

See Roberts v. Sawyer, 229 N.C. 279 , 49 S.E. 2d 468 , and cases cited. … See Cornelison v. Hammond, 225 N.C. 535 , 35 S.E. 2d 633 , where the subject has been recently fully discussed and applied in opinion by Barnhill, J.

Michael v. Brown

215 N.C. 655 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 24, 1939

R. v. Olive, 142 N. C., 257 , 55 S. E., 263 . As we- understand tbe record and interpret it, tbe plaintiff bas no just cause for complaint.

Brown v. Williams

242 N.C. 648 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 28, 1955

Lance v. Cogdill, 238 N.C. 500, 78 S.E. 2d 319 . Accordingly the restraining order was continued to the final determination of the action.

Brown v. Linville Railway Co.

174 N.C. 694 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1917

In Le Beau v. R. … Ramsbottom v. R. R., 138 N. C., 38 ; Brewster v. Elizabeth City, 137 N. C., 392 .”

Brown v. Doby

244 N.C. 746 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1956

Board of Education v. Allen, 243 N.C. 520 , 91 S.E. 2d 180 . The respondents’ rights are limited to the recovery of damages. The petitioners’ liability is to pay them. The parties failed to agree as to the amount.

Brown v. Nesbitt

271 N.C. 532 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1967

Jyachosky v. Wensil, 240 N.C. 217 , 81 S.E. 2d 644 ; Whiteside v. McCarson, 250 N.C. 673 , 110 S.E. 2d 295 ; Duckworth v. Metcalf, 268 N.C. 340 , 150 S.E. 2d 485 . As to the necessity of such pleading: Hartley v. … See Whiteside v. McCarson, supra, and Torres v. Smith, 269 N.C. 546 , 153 S.E. 2d 129 .

Board of Supervisors Public Roads v. Board of Commissioners

169 N.C. 548 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1915

In Glenn v. Comrs., 139 N. … This case is cited with approval in Davenport v.