Case law

Teeter v. . Telegraph Co.

172 N.C. 784 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 22, 1916

In Brown v. … R. v.

Teeter v. Horner Military School

165 N.C. 564 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 13, 1914

Burpee v. … Manson v. Culver Military School, 141 Ill. App., 250 ; Fessman v. Seely, 30 S. W. Rep., 268 ; Benedict Memorial School v. Bradford, 36 S. E. (Ga.), 920; Hodgins v. Inh. of Rockport, 105 Mass., 475 ; Vermillion v.

Henderson Water Co. v. Trustees of Henderson Graded Schools

151 N.C. 171 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 20, 1909

Fawcett v. Mt. Airy, 134 N. C., 125 , overruling Mayo v. Comrs., 122 N. C., 5 ; Davis v. Fremont, 135 N. C., 538 ; Robinson v. Goldsboro, 135 N. C., 382 ; Wadsworth v. Concord, 133 N. C., 587 , overruling Edgerton v. … C., 93 ; Smith v. Goldsboro, 121 N. C., 350 ; Gas Co. v. Raleigh, 75 N. C., 274 ; Greensboro v. Scott, 138 N. C., 181 ; Elizabeth City v. Banks, 150 N. C., 407 .

Craven County v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.

237 N.C. 502 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 15, 1953

Brown, 234 N.C. 517 , 67 S.E. 2d 489 ; Sedberry v. Parsons, 232 N.C. 707 , 62 S.E. 2d 88 ; Higdon v. Jaffa, 231 N.C. 242 , 56 S.E. 2d 661 ; Turner v. Glenn, supra; Humphrey v. … Stephens Co. v. Homes Co., supra; Homes Co. v. Falls, supra; Snyder v. Heath, supra; Higdon v. Jaffa, supra; East Side Builders v. Brown, supra. See also Besch v. Hyman, 223 N.Y.S. 231 , 221 App.

Burke Transit Co. v. Queen City Coach Co.

228 N.C. 768 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 14, 1948

Patterson v. Hulls, 65 N. C., 119 ; Motor Service v. R. R., 210 N. C., 36 , 185 S. E., 479 . … Said Justice Brown in Town of Roper v. Leary, 171 N. C., 35 , 87 S. E., 945 , “Both remedies may be available.” See also Orloff v. Los Angeles Turf Club, 171 A. L. R., 913. 3.

State v. . R. R.

149 N.C. 508 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 2, 1908

S. v. Pickett , 118 N.C. 1231 ; S. v. Williams , 117 N.C. 753 ; S. v. Jones , 80 N.C. 415 . … Cited: S. v. Starnes , 151 N.C. 725 ; Hollowell v. R. R. , 153 N.C. 21 ; S. v. Denton , 154 N.C. 648 ; Park v. Exum , 156 N.C. 231 ; Holt v. Wellons , 163 N.C. 131 ; S. v. Wilkerson , 164 N.C. 449 ; S. v.

Browne v. Raleigh & Gaston Railroad

108 N.C. 34 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1891

Deans v. Railroad, 107 N. C., 686 . … Malcom v. Railroad, 106 N. C., 63 ; 2 Wood’s R. L., p. 1126, §305; 2 Beach R. L., supra; Chambers v. Railroad, 91 N. C., 471 ; Smith v. Railroad, 99 N.

Love v. . Harris

156 N.C. 88 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 27, 1911

Dickerson v. Simmons , 141 N.C. 325 (opinion by Justice Brown ,) is distinguishable. … Newport v. Smith , 61 Minn. 277 ; Baltzen v. McClay , 53 N.Y. 467 . In Michael v.

Hahn v. . Fletcher

189 N.C. 729 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1925

In Bank v. Watson, 187 N. … Brown v. Southerland, 142 N. C., p. 225, decides: Headnote 1.

Baldwin v. Maultsby

27 N.C. 505 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1845

The cases of Parkes v. Meares, 2 Bos. & P. 217, and Grillier v. Niel and others, Peak’s Cases 146, have been cited. … In the case of Jakes v. The Methodist Church, 17 Johns.

Hicks v. Barnes.

132 N.C. 146 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 17, 1903

In Hussey v. Rountree, 44 N. … In Avitt v. Smith, 120 N.

State v. . Adkins

194 N.C. 749 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 21, 1927

defendant related to the misconduct of the officer in charge of the jury, in communicating to the jury, while engaged in its deliberations, the fact that the defendant and his wife and daughter had applied for lodging to the boarding … S. v. Crane, 110 N. C., 530 . Undoubtedly the discretion committed to the trial judge is a sound, legal discretion and not to be exercised arbitrarily or capriciously.

Slade v. . Sherrod

175 N.C. 346 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 1918

Howard v. Plumbing Co., 154 N. C., 224 . … In Howard v. Plumbing Co., supra, it is held: “Therefore, if be accepts tbe satisfaction voluntarily made by one, that is a bar to all.

Henderson Ex Rel. Utley v. Powell

221 N.C. 239 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 29, 1942

Brown v. R. R., 195 N. C., 699 , 143 S. E., 536 ; Smith v. Coach Co., 214 N. C., 314 , 199 S. E., 90 . … Newell v. Darnell ( 209 N. C., 254 , 183 S. E., 374 ); Beach v. Patton ( 208 N. C., 134 , 179 S. E., 446 ); Hinnant v. R. R. ( 202 N. C., 489 , 163 S. E., 555 ); Balcum v. Johnson, 177 N. C., 213 , 98 S. E., 532 .

Town of Shelby v. Cleveland Mill & Power Co.

155 N.C. 196 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 11, 1911

In Com. v. … S. v. Holman, 104 N. C., 861 ; 1 Abbot on Mun. Corp., 209; Re O’Brien, 1 A. & E., Ann. Cases, 373; Portland v. Cook, 48 Or., 550 ; Miles City v. Board of Health, 25 L. R. A., 591.

State v. Jordan

277 N.C. 341 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 18, 1970

Upon returning to the area where the person had dropped something, the officer found a small screwdriver, a pair of metal cutters, an adjustable wrench, a pair of brown cloth work gloves, punches, chisels, and a brace and … State v. Giles, 254 N.C. 499 , 119 S.E. 2d 394 ; State v. Bell, supra; Goodwin v. U.S., 347 F. 2d 793 ; U.S. v. Owens, 346 F. 2d 329 ; State v. Durham, 367 S.W. 2d 619 .

State v. Lawson

310 N.C. 632 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 30, 1984

Leaving his dirty brown Ford in her driveway, the two departed in her automobile. Defendant directed her to drive on the Old Salisbury Road. … Brown, 306 N.C. 151 , 293 S.E. 2d 569 , cert. denied, 103 S.Ct. 503 (1982); State v. Pinch, 306 N.C. 1 , 292 S.E. 2d 203 , cert. denied, 103 S.Ct. 474 (1982); State v.

Hill v. Commissioners of Forsythe County

67 N.C. 367 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1872

Taylor v. … The Board of Commissioners, who may be sup-. posed to represent the popular will, are anxious to meet the-obligations incurred, and the Court will not allow technical:, an.d frivolous objections, calculated to impair the

State v. Furr

292 N.C. 711 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 13, 1977

By early 1975, however, Furr’s plans extended as well to Earlene and her attorney, Charles Brown. … Defendant’s conversations with Huneycutt are obviously designed to accomplish one end: to procure the deaths of Johnny Jhue Laney, Earlene Furr and Charles Brown.

State v. Tuggle

284 N.C. 515 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 25, 1974

State v. McVay and State v. Simmons, 277 N.C. 410, 417 , 177 S.E. 2d 874, 878 (1970); State v. McVay and State v. Simmons, 279 N.C. 428, 432 , 183 S.E. 2d 652, 655 (1971); State v. … Hicks got a brown paper bag and she and defendant put the bills in it. Defendant ordered Mrs.. Hicks to the back of the store, took the bag and left. Some two minutes later Mrs.