Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.05s
Den Ex Dem. Southerland v. Cox
14 N.C. 394 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1832
Brown, Cro. J. 590. 1 Eq. ca. Ab. 187.) … (Han bury v. Cockerell. Fearne 396.)
Cited 4 timesPublished228 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 8, 1947
Tyndall v. Hines Co., 226 N. C., 620 . … Brown v. Products Co., 222 N. C., 626 , 24 S. E. (2d), 334 ; Reeves v. Staley, 220 N. C., 573 , 18 S. E. (2d), 239 ; Hoke v. Greyhound Corp., 227 N. C., 412 .
Cited 5 timesPublished113 N.C. 249 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1893
Commissioners v. Murray, 2 Vir. Cases, 504; Bridgers v. Ridgley, 2 Litt. (Ky.), 395. … Sumner v. Sessoms, 94 N. C., 371 ; Doyle v. Brown, 72 N. C., 393 , and numerous other decisions in our Reports.
Cited 10 timesPublished223 N.C. 446 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 13, 1943
Pigford v. R. R., 160 N. C., 93 , 75 S. E., 860 ; 3. v. Bowman, 78 N. C., 509 ; Ray v. Ray, 98 N. C., 567 ; Martin v. Hanes Co., 189 N. C., 644 , 127 S. E., 688 ; Godfrey v. Power Co., 190 N. C., 24 , 128 S. E., 485 . … S . v. McKnight, 196 N. C., 259 , 145 S. E., 281 , and cases cited; S. v. Linney, 212 N. C., 739 , 194 S. E., 470 ; S. v. Brown, 218 N. C., 415 , 11 S. E. (2d), 321 . Here no defect appears.
Cited 26 timesPublished152 N.C. 660 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 27, 1910
Brown, J. … Gibbons v. Mahon, 136 U. S., 558 .
Cited 10 timesPublished177 N.C. 490 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 21, 1919
This has been so fully discussed that it is only necessary to cite a few of the cases: Wilmington v. Bryan , 141 N.C. 679 ; Guilford v. Georgia Co. , 112 N.C. 37 ; Gatling v. Comrs. , 92 N.C. 536 ; Cobb v. … Elizabeth City , 75 N.C. 1 ; Battle v. Thompson , 65 N.C. 406 . In Wilmington v. Bryan , 141 N.C. 675 , Brown, J. , says: `No counterclaim is valid against a demand for taxes,' citing Gatling v. Comrs., supra .
Cited 8 timesPublished116 N.C. 828 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1895
The testimony shows that the board of directors of defendant company *Page 489 consisted of five members, Avery being one of them, and that he and two others were present at this meeting. … Cited: S. c. , 120 N.C. 476 ; Bank v. Furniture Co. , 122 N.C. 752 ; Glass Plate Co. v. Furniture Co. , 126 N.C. 889 . *Page 491
Cited 3 timesPublishedFairbanks, Morse & Company, Inc. v. J. A. Murdock Co.
207 N.C. 348 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1934
Buie v. Brown, 104 N. C., 335 . As a corollary of this rule, therefore, it may be said that a complaint cannot be overthrown by a demurrer unless it be wholly insufficient. … Justice Walker has been often cited and approved by this Court, most recently in the case of Insurance Company v. Dey, 206 N. C., 368 .
Cited 9 timesPublished219 N.C. 626 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 21, 1941
Long v. Guaranty Co., 178 N. C., 503 , 101 S. E., 11 ; Sills v. Ford, 171 N. C., 733 , 88 S. E., 636 . … Bernhardt v. Brown, 118 N. C., 701 , 24 S. E., 527 . Except as thus modified, the judgment of the Superior Court is Affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublished240 N.C. 606 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 1954
In the case of S. v. … S. v. Vinson, 63 N.C. 335 ; S. v. Brantley, 84 N.C. 766 . In the case of S. v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedBradshaw v. Hilton Lumber Co .
172 N.C. 219 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1916
BrowN, J. The plaintiff seeks to recover damages for cutting pine timber on his lands of a size smaller than 12 inches in diameter. … Driller Co. v. Worth, 117 N. C., 515 ; Ogden v. Land Co., 146 N. C., 443 . 2.
Cited 4 timesPublished196 N.C. 275 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1928
Earwood v. R. R., 192 N. C., 27 , 133 S. E., 180 ; Albritton v. Hill, 190 N. C., 429 , 130 S. E., 5 ; Graham, v. Charlotte, 186 N. C., 649 , 120 S. E., 466 . In Taylor v. Stewart, 172 N. C., 204 , 90 S. … See, also, Taylor v. Lumber Co., 173 N. C., 112 , 91 S. E., 719 .
Cited 2 timesPublished321 N.C. 301 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1988
State v. Brown, 315 N.C. 40, 55 , 337 S.E. 2d 808, 820 (1985), cert. denied,- -- U.S. ---, 90 L.Ed. 2d 733 (1986). … State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179 , 358 S.E. 2d 1 (1987). We decline to overrule our recent holding in Brown. Second, the defendant requests that we reject our holding in State v.
Vacated on other grounds by Shirk v. McLaughlin, 488 U.S. 806 (1988)Cited 89 timesPublished353 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 21, 2000
See State v. Leroux, 326 N.C. 368, 378 , 390 S.E.2d 314, 322 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 , 112 L. Ed. 2d *45 155 (1990); Brown, 320 N.C. at 191 , 358 S.E.2d at 11 ; State v. … State v. Brown, 327 N.C. 1, 20 , 394 S.E.2d 434, 446 (1990).
Cited 39 timesPublished271 N.C. 456 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 27, 1967
State v. Duncan, 270 N.C. 241, 246 , 154 S.E. 2d 53 . The only assignment of error in the record is the exception to the judgment, which presents only the face of the record proper for review. Dellinger v. … While we do not hold that as a matter of law the punishment was in excess of the powers of the judge, we must note that the sentences were imposed under circumstances which would seem to warrant prompt review by the Board
Cited 15 timesPublished175 N.C. 406 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 17, 1918
Halstead v. Mullen, 93 N. C., 252 ; Sullivan v. Blount, 165 N. C., 7 . Tbe motion to nonsuit was properly overruled. … Smith v. Tew, 127 N. C., 299 ; Bynum v. Thompson, 25 N. C., 579 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedWoodruff v. Piedmont Trust Co.
173 N.C. 546 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 16, 1917
In Browne on Statute of Frauds (5 Ed.), 469; sec. 346, it is said that “The return of the sheriff upon an execution, however informal, is a sufficient writing within the statute of frauds,” citing Nichols v. … In Ruckle v.
Questioned by Stearns v. Woolard (In re Laughing-House), 51 B.R. 869 (1985)Cited 6 timesPublished200 N.C. 321 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 27, 1931
Eubanks v. Becton, 158 N. C., 231 ; Brown v. Jennings, 188 N. C., 155 . All the parties to the contract are entitled to have the same carried out as written. In Stevens v. Turlington, 186 N. … In Sullivan v. Kuolt, 145 N.
Cited 8 timesPublishedMorris v. Seashore Transportation Co.
208 N.C. 807 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1935
To the same effect is the utterance of Brown, J., in Cullifer v. R. R., 168 N. C., 309 , 84 S. … C., 310 ; Wheeler v. Gibbon, 126 N. C., 811 ; Ray v. R. R., 141 N. C., 84 ; Casada v. Ford, 189 N. C., 744 ; Caudle v. R. R., 202 N. C., 404 . For the reasons given, the judgment must be Reversed.
Cited 7 timesPublishedMitchem v. National Weaving Co.
210 N.C. 732 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 25, 1936
E., 446 ; Merrell v. Dudley, 139 N. C., 57 , 51 S. E., 777 ; Kelly v. Traction Co., 132 N. C., 369 , 43 S. E., 923 ; 38 C. J., 478; 18 R. C. L., 28. In Brown v. Martin, 176 N. C., 31 , 96 S. … Stanford v. Grocery Co., supra; Jones v. R. R., 131 N. C., 133 , 42 S. E., 559 ; Griffin v. Sellers, 19 N. C., 492 ; Plummer v. Gheen, 10 N. C., 66 . The case is not like Price v. Stanley, 128 N. C., 38 , 38 S.
Cited 11 timesPublished
Ask Donna