Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.61s
167 N.C. 576 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1914
In Powers v. … The degree of care must be commensurate with the dangerous character of the article”; and the same case is cited by Justice Brown in Wood v. McCabe, 151 N.
Cited 27 timesPublished61 N.C. 126 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1867
Brown on Actions, 364; Murchison v. McNeill, Win, 320; Worth v. Commissioners of Fayetteville, Win. Eq., 70, where it is assumed to be settled. … The same remark may be made as to the case of Davis v. Dashiel, ante, p. 114.
Cited 4 timesPublished13 N.C. 90 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1829
Cited: Hite v. Goodman , 21 N.C. 365 ; Sellers v. Streator , 50 N.C. 262 ; Brown v. Bostian , 51 N.C. 3 ; Fisher v. Pender , 52 N.C. 486 ; Bryson v. Lucas , 84 N.C. 683 ; Burwell v. Linthicum , 100 N.C. 148 ; Russell v. … Koonce , 104 N.C. 241 ; LeRoy v. Jacobosky , 136 N.C. 448 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedFirst National Bank of Henderson v. Johnston
169 N.C. 526 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 29, 1915
In Cady v. … See, also, Glaze v. Ferguson , 48 Kan. 157 ; Bank v. Ryerson , 23 Iowa 509 ; Bank v. Dibrell , 91 Tenn. 301 ; McMonigal v. Brown , 45 Ohio State, 499 ."
Cited 8 timesPublished190 N.C. 382 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 4, 1925
Christman v. Hilliard , 167 N.C. 6 ; Oil Co. v. Hunt , 187 N.C. 157 ; Hanes v. Utilities Co. , 188 N.C. 465 ; Hancock v. Southgate, 186 N.C. 282 ." Lindsey v. Lumber Co. , 189 N.C. 119 ; Nash v. … The trolley wires are up under the side of the weather-boarding.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHill v. Commissioners of Forsythe County
67 N.C. 367 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1872
Taylor v. … The Board of Commissioners, who may be sup-. posed to represent the popular will, are anxious to meet the-obligations incurred, and the Court will not allow technical:, an.d frivolous objections, calculated to impair the
Cited 9 timesPublishedBateman v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
174 N.C. 97 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 26, 1917
Shelby Ice and Fuel Co. v. Ry. Co., 147 N. C., 66 . In that case we followed Hanley v. R. R., 187 U. … Co. v. James, 162 U. S., 650 ; Same v. Pendleton, 122 U. S., 347 ; Same v. Brown, 244 U. S., 542 . In W. U. Tel. Co. v. Bolling (Va.), S.
Cited 13 timesPublished167 N.C. 14 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 30, 1914
WALKER, J., concurring; BROWN, J., dissenting; HOKE, J., concurring in the dissenting opinion. … This case cites U.S. v. Fox , 94 U.S. 315 , and is cited Moen v. Moen , 16 S.D. 214 . In Cutting v.
Cited 6 timesPublished160 N.C. 559 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1912
JUSTICE BROWN. PLAINTIFF'S APPEAL. … Robinson v. Cathcart , 2 Cr. C. C., 590; Richards v. Edick , 17 Barb. N.
Cited 2 timesPublishedMorris v. Seashore Transportation Co.
208 N.C. 807 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1935
To the same effect is the utterance of Brown, J., in Cullifer v. R. R., 168 N. C., 309 , 84 S. … C., 310 ; Wheeler v. Gibbon, 126 N. C., 811 ; Ray v. R. R., 141 N. C., 84 ; Casada v. Ford, 189 N. C., 744 ; Caudle v. R. R., 202 N. C., 404 . For the reasons given, the judgment must be Reversed.
Cited 7 timesPublished97 N.C. 388 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1887
Goldsboro township, chapter 115, §10, Laws of 1885, authorizes and directs a committee of persons named therein to cause a fence to be built around the township in the manner, prescribed in the act, and to report to the board … omission of their duty, the public suffer, they may be indicted, but the indictment must point out the particular public duty neglected — must “ set out the specific duty imposed upon them, which they have neglected;'' State v.
Cited 1 timesPublished352 N.C. 287 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 13, 2000
Not as a rule all of the way across the board.” … Juror Julie Brown (Brown) admitted that she had read an article about defendant in the newspaper at issue in this case.
Cited 93 timesPublished192 N.C. 159 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 15, 1926
In reference to land the approved definition of market value is given in Brown v. Power Co., 140 N. C., 333 . … In Smith v. R. R., 68 N.
Cited 2 timesPublishedPenn-Allen Cement Co. v. Phillips
182 N.C. 437 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 16, 1921
C., 242 ; Shields v. Freeman, 158 N. C., 123 ; Chadwick v. R. R., 161 N. C., 209 ; Walker v. Reeves, 165 N. C., 35 ; Chambers v. R. R., 172 N. C., 555 ; Joyner v. Reflector Co., 176 N. C., 277 ; Headman v. … C., 111 , where Brown, J., says: “We are of opinion that this appeal is premature, and under the rules of the Court it must be dismissed ex mero motu.
Cited 23 timesPublished348 N.C. 417 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 9, 1998
State v. Brown, 315 N.C. 40, 50 , 337 S.E.2d 808, 817 (1985), cert, denied, 476 U.S. 1164 , 90 L. Ed. 2d 733 (1986), overruled on other grounds by State v. Vandiver, 321 N.C. 570 , 364 S.E.2d 373 (1988). … State v. Brown, 335 N.C. 477, 492 , 439 S.E.2d 589, 598 (1994). Furthermore, Christopher Moore’s belief is not pertinent to defendant’s guilt or innocence. Defendant' presented no evidence.
Cited 43 timesPublishedThe People of N.C. Ex Rel . Van Bokkelen v. . Canaday
73 N.C. 198 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1875
Littlefield v. Green , Brightley, 493; Mann v. Cassidey , 1 Brewst., 60; Weaver v. Green , Ibid, 140; Battery v. Megany , Ibid, 162; Gibbons v. Sheppard , 2 Brewst., 1; Harper v. Greenbank , 1 Brewst., 189. … V.
Cited 36 timesPublished84 N.C. 532 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1881
Eure v. Paxton, 80 N. C., 17 ; Thaxton v. Williamson, 72 N. C., 125 ; Covington v. Ingram, 64 N. C., 123 . … Brown v. Coble, 76 N. C., 391.
Cited 9 timesPublished191 N.C. 90 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 27, 1926
Orr v. Rumbough, 172 N. C., 754 . … In Brown v. Scofields Co., 174 N.
Cited 10 timesPublished179 N.C. 631 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1920
Delafield v. Construction Co. , 115 N.C. 21 , and citations thereto in Anno. Ed. … The only case that bears a contrary construction is Knowles v. Savage , 140 N.C. 372 .
Cited 3 timesPublished693 S.E.2d 658 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 26, 2010
693 S.E.2d 658 (2010) LIBERTARIAN PARTY, et al. v. STATE, et al. No. 479A09. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 26, 2010. Kenneth A. Soo, Raleigh, for Libertarian Party of NC. Robert M. … Peters, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State Board of Elections. Allison J. Riggs, Irving Joyner, Durham, Damon Circosta, for Southern Coalition for Social Justice, et al.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna