Case law

Wood-Hopkins Contracting Co. v. North Carolina State Ports Authority

284 N.C. 732 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1974

Yates v. Brown, 275 N.C. 634 , 170 S.E. 2d 477 ; Root v. Insurance Co., 272 N.C. 580 , 158 S.E. 2d 829 ; Lester Bros., Inc. v. Thompson Co., 261 N.C. 210 , 134 S.E. 2d 372 ; Trust Co. v. … General Metals v. Manufacturing Co., 259 N.C. 709 , 131 S.E. 2d 360 ; Construction Co. v. Crain and Denbo, Inc., 256 N.C. 110 , 123 S.E. 2d 590 ; Bizzell v. Bizzell, 247 N.C. 590 , 101 S.E. 2d 668 .

McKinney v. North Carolina State Highway Commission

192 N.C. 670 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 8, 1926

J\, after stating tbe case: In Latham v. Highway Commission, 191 N. … This circumstance was considered and allowed significance in several actions against municipal or gwasi-municipal boards or corporations, but we have never extended it to tbe State Highway Commission.

Brittain v. . Mull

99 N.C. 483 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1888

Doyle v. Brown, 72 N. C., 393 . It is true, that, in the order of sale, the case is stated by its title, FS. E. Mull, administrator, &c., plaintiffs, against. … Fanshaw v. Fanshaw, Bus., 166; Armfield v. Moore, Ibid., 157; Skinner v. Moore, 2 D. & B., 138; *492 Pigot v. Davis, 3 Hawks, 25 ; Williams v. Harrington, 11 Ired., 616 ; Marshall v. Fisher, 1 Jones, 111 ; Bender v.

S & W Realty & Bonded Commercial Agency, Inc. v. Duckworth & Shelton, Inc.

274 N.C. 243 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 23, 1968

Cromartie v. Colby, supra; Thompson v. Foster, supra; Lindsey v. Speight, 224 N.C. 453 , 31 S.E. 2d 371 ; Trust Co. v. Goode, supra; Martin v. Holly, supra. … A corporation is required to keep minutes of the proceedings of its shareholders and board of directors. G.S. 55-37. They are the best evidence of its acts. Pegram-West v.

Stephenson v. Bartlett

358 N.C. 219 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 22, 2004

Edmisten v. … Carolina Psychology Board to meet annually in Raleigh); N.C.G.S. § 90A-57 (2003) (State Board of Sanitarian Examiners to meet annually in Raleigh); N.C.G.S. § 106-4 (2003) (Board of Agriculture to meet at least twice a year

State v. Blakeney

352 N.C. 287 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 13, 2000

Not as a rule all of the way across the board.” … Juror Julie Brown (Brown) admitted that she had read an article about defendant in the newspaper at issue in this case.

Southern Distributing Co. v. Carraway

189 N.C. 420 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 8, 1925

Bank v. … It is the act of the parties rather than that of the court” —Brown, J., in Belcher v. Cobb, 169 N. C., p. 694. See, also, Harrison v. Dill, 169 N. C., 545 ; Lynch v. Loftin, 153 N. C., 270 ; Henry v. Hilliard, 120 N.

Watkins v. Shaw

234 N.C. 96 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 17, 1951

This Court held in the case of Ervin v. … In re Brown’s Estate, 122 Mont. 451 , 206 P. 2d 816 ; Succession of Raborn, 210 La. 1033 , 29 So. 2d 53 ; Hallett v. Bailey, 143 Maine 1 , 54 A. 2d 533 ; In re Myers’ Estate, 359 Pa. 517 , 60 A. 2d 50 ; Mitchell v.

Cheek v. City of Charlotte

273 N.C. 293 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1968

In State v. … State v. Glidden Co., supra at 666, 46 S.E. 2d at 862 . Accord, Motley v. Board of Barber Examiners, 228 N.C. 337 , 45 S.E. 2d 550 .

Jones v. . Jones

173 N.C. 279 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 4, 1917

Tbe cases of Everton v. Everton, 50 N. C., 202 , and Miller v. Miller, 89 N. … Page v. Page, 167 N.

SUGAR CREEK SCHOOL v. Boe

687 S.E.2d 295 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 5, 2009

687 S.E.2d 295 (2009) SUGAR CREEK SCHOOL v. BOE, et al. No. 122P09. Supreme Court of North Carolina. November 5, 2009. Robert J. King, III, for Charlotte-Mecklenburg BOE. Richard A. … The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of May 2009 by Winston Salem/Forsyth County Board of Education for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief: "Motion Dismissed as Moot by order of the Court in

Commissioners v. . Hall

177 N.C. 490 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 21, 1919

This has been so fully discussed that it is only necessary to cite a few of the cases: Wilmington v. Bryan , 141 N.C. 679 ; Guilford v. Georgia Co. , 112 N.C. 37 ; Gatling v. Comrs. , 92 N.C. 536 ; Cobb v. … Elizabeth City , 75 N.C. 1 ; Battle v. Thompson , 65 N.C. 406 . In Wilmington v. Bryan , 141 N.C. 675 , Brown, J. , says: `No counterclaim is valid against a demand for taxes,' citing Gatling v. Comrs., supra .

State v. Silva

304 N.C. 122 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1981

Each was armed, one with a small silver gun, the other with a large black handgun which had a brown stock and a black barrel. … In State v.

Jones v. Norfolk Southern Railroad

176 N.C. 260 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 23, 1918

engineer to use due care to operate the train at a moderate rate of speed, so as to enable his coemployee to board it without undue peril. … In Ry. v.

Newell v. . Green

169 N.C. 462 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 1915

Broadfoot v. Fayetteville, 121 N. C., 418 , as to stock running at large, which cited as instances, local prohibition acts, S. v. Joyner, 81 N. C., 354 ; S. v. Stovall, 103 N. C., 416 ; S. v. Barringer, 110 N. … This is fully discussed iu Holton v. Comrs., 93 N. C., 436 , reviewed and approved in Brown v. Comrs., 100 N. C., 98 ; Tate v. Comrs., 122 N. C., 813 .

Barnett v. Mills

167 N.C. 576 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1914

In Powers v. … The degree of care must be commensurate with the dangerous character of the article”; and the same case is cited by Justice Brown in Wood v. McCabe, 151 N.

Horton v. . Perry

229 N.C. 319 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 13, 1948

Brown v. Coble, 76 N. C., 391 ; Logan v. Wallis, 76 N. C., 416 ; Street v. Tuck, 84 N. C., 605 ; Burns v. Williams, 88 N. C., 159 ; Mitchell v. Mitchell, 96 N. C., 14, 17 , 1 S. E., 648 ; Montgomery v. Blades, 217 N. … Cited in Abbitt v. Gregory, 201 N. C., 577, 594 , 160 S. E., 896 , and in Peeples v. R. R., Edwards v. R. R., Kearney v. R. R., 228 N. C., 590 , 46 S. E. (2d), 649 .

Barnes v. . Utility Co.

190 N.C. 382 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 4, 1925

Christman v. Hilliard , 167 N.C. 6 ; Oil Co. v. Hunt , 187 N.C. 157 ; Hanes v. Utilities Co. , 188 N.C. 465 ; Hancock v. Southgate, 186 N.C. 282 ." Lindsey v. Lumber Co. , 189 N.C. 119 ; Nash v. … The trolley wires are up under the side of the weather-boarding.

Wise v. HARRINGTON GROVE COMMUNITY

357 N.C. 582 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 31, 2003

Wise v. … HARRINGTON GROVE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. and Tom Fitzgerald, Tamara James, Dave Becherer, Stewart Joslin, Bill Schultz, and Mike Dalton, in their official capacities as members of the Harrington Grove Community Association Board

Morris v. Seashore Transportation Co.

208 N.C. 807 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1935

To the same effect is the utterance of Brown, J., in Cullifer v. R. R., 168 N. C., 309 , 84 S. … C., 310 ; Wheeler v. Gibbon, 126 N. C., 811 ; Ray v. R. R., 141 N. C., 84 ; Casada v. Ford, 189 N. C., 744 ; Caudle v. R. R., 202 N. C., 404 . For the reasons given, the judgment must be Reversed.