Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.69s
Southern Butane Gas Corp. v. Bullard
232 N.C. 730 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 29, 1950
Rader v. Coach Co., 225 N.C. 537 , 35 S.E. 2d 609 ; Fox v. Mills, Inc., 225 N.C. 580 , 35 S.E. 2d 869 ; Brown v. Truck Lines, 227 N.C. 65 , 40 S.E. 2d 476 ; Roach v. Prichett, 228 N.C. 747 , 47 S.E. 2d 20 ; Simmons v.
Cited 0 timesPublished143 N.C. 683 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 22, 1907
State v. Burton, 113 N. C., 655 ; State v. Cagle, 114 N. C., 835 ; Myers v. Stafford, ibid,., 231; State v. Wynne, 116 N. C., 981 . … State v. Brown, 46 N. C., 129 ; Ward v. Bell, 52 N. C., 79 ; State v. Edwards, 110 N. C., 511 . ThR question is fully discussed in State v. Morgan, 141 N.
Cited 18 timesPublished95 N.C. 563 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1886
To the same effect, see Johnson v. Patterson, 2 Hawks, 183 ; Satterwhite v. Hicks, Busb. L., 105; Headen v. Womack, 88 N. C., 468. … Lenoux v. Brown, 12 C. B., 801; Bonham v. Craig, 80 N. C., 224 ; Foust v. Shoffner, Phil. Eq., 242; Green v. N. C. R. R. Co., 77 N. C., 95 ; Mizell v. Burnett, 4 Jones, 249 .
Cited 18 timesPublishedAlbemarle Lumber Co. v. Wilcox
105 N.C. 34 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1890
Avery, J. after stating the facts: We concur with the Judge below in the opinion that, if the testimony was true or was believed by the jury, the title to the lumber vested in the plaintiff when it was placed on board the … Waldo v. Belcher, 11 Ired., 609 ; Morgan v. Perkins, 1 Jones, 171 ; Cohen v. Stewart, 98 N. C., 97 ; May v. Gentry, 4 Dev. & Bat., 117 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedCommissioners of Bladen County v. Boring
175 N.C. 105 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 21, 1918
R. v. McKenonill, 203 U. S., 514 ; Riggsbee v. Durham, 94 N. C., 800 ; Greene v. Owen, 125 N. C., 212 . … The costs of this Court will be taxed against the plaintiff Board of Commissioners of Bladen County. Modified.
Cited 5 timesPublished334 N.C. 575 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 10, 1993
Brown v. Brown, 264 N.C. 485 , 14 S.E.2d 875 (1965). It could believe the defendant was the aggressor. This assignment of error is overruled. … State v. McDowell, 310 N.C. 61, 310 S.E.2d 301 (1984). In Maynard v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedMizell v. Dennis Simmons Lumber Co.
174 N.C. 68 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1917
Brown, J. … Waterman v. Banks, 144 U. S., 394 ; Hacher v. Weston, 197 Mass., 143 ; Gaston v. School District, 94 Mich., 502 ; Newton v. Newton, 11 R. I., 390; Bostwick v. Hess, 80 Ill., 138 .
Cited 10 timesPublished119 N.C. 34 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1896
Browne on Parol Ev., 99 ; Greenleaf Ev., 303 ; Swain v. Seamens, 9 Wallace, 271; Emerson v. Slater, 22 Howard, 41 . In the last cited case the Court cite the case of Goss v. … State v. Rogers, 93 N. C., 523 ; Anderson v. Steamboat Co., 64 N. C., 399 ; Weisenfield v. McLean, 96 N. C., 248 ; Jackson v. Commissioners, 76 N. C., 282 .
Cited 14 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Boothe v. Upchurch
110 N.C. 62 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1892
Board Education v. Bateman, 102 N. C., 52 . … Board of Education v. Bateman, supra. It is not contended that this restriction operates upon any other class of persons who may have lost by the misappropriation of fiduciary funds by the Clerk.
Cited 5 timesPublished219 N.C. 612 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 21, 1941
See S. v. Dixon, 75 N. C., 275 ; S. v. Riley, 113 N. C., 648 , 18 S. E., 690 ; S. v. Green, 134 N. C., 658 , 46 S. E., 761 ; S. v. Hill, 141 N. C., 769 , 53 S. E., 311 ; S. v. Langley, 204 N. C., 687 , 169 S. … And in 8. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedSANDY MUSH PROPERTIES, INC. v. Rutherford County
651 S.E.2d 566 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 24, 2007
651 S.E.2d 566 (2007) SANDY MUSH PROPERTIES, INC. and FLAT ROCK INDUSTRIES, INC. v. RUTHERFORD COUNTY by and through the Rutherford County Board of Commissioners. No. 67PA07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. … ORDER The plaintiff's Petition for Discretionary Review is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration of its decision in light of Robins v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDillard v. Farmers Mercantile Co.
190 N.C. 225 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 7, 1925
Perry v. Taylor, 148 N. C., 362 ; Houser v. Fayssoux, 168 N. C., 1 ; Bank v. Wilson, 168 N. C., 557 ; Meyers v. Battle, 170 N. C., 168 ; Barber v. Absher Co., 175 N. C., 602 ; Gillam v. Walker, 189 N. … In Houser v. Fayssoux, 168 N.
Cited 21 timesPublished217 N.C. 644 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 8, 1940
McKeethan v. Atkinson, 46 N. C., 421 ; Wilfong v. Cline, 46 N. C., 500 ; Lowe v. Sowell, *648 48 N. C., 67 ; Green v. Greensboro Female College, 83 N. C., 449 ; 35 Am. Rep., 579 ; Campbell v. Brown, 86 N. … Battle v. Battle, supra. See, also, Hewlett v. Schenck, 82 N. C., 234 ; Supply Co. v. Dowd, supra.
Cited 13 timesPublished242 N.C. 566 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1955
Ervin v. Conn, 225 N.C. 267 , 34 S.E. 2d 402 ; Watkins v. Shaw, Comr. of Revenue, 234 N.C. 96 , 65 S.E. 2d 881 . Plaintiff’s contention that Mrs. … Decisions such as Chemical Co. v. Walston, 187 N.C. 817 , 123 S.E. 196 , and Brown v. McLean, 217 N.C. 555 , 8 S.E. 2d 807 , have no application.
Cited 6 timesPublished169 N.C. 727 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 27, 1915
Brown, J. It appears tbat tbe plaintiffs conveyed certain timber to tbe defendants, by deed dated 14 January, 1905, with tbe privilege of cutting and carrying off tbe said timber witbin ten years. … This case differs from Powers v. Lumber Co., 154 N.
Cited 2 timesPublished190 N.C. 268 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 14, 1925
Loomis v. Railroad, 165 Mo., 469 ; Oklahoma Co. v. Hastings, 194 Pac., 223 ; Von Arnim v. Am. Tubeworks, 188 Mass., 515 ; Sheeby v. Barry, 89 At. (Conn.), 259. … Edwards v. Berlin, 56 Pac. (Cal.), 432; Clark v. Comrs., 11 Neb., 484 ; Chicago v. Mohr, 216 Ill., 320 ; Lumber Co. v. Mayor, 99 So. (La.), 687; 2 Dillon on Municipal Corporations, sec. 811, p. 1224.
Cited 19 timesPublishedSanders v. STATE PERSONNEL COMMISSION
363 N.C. 806 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 28, 2010
Mobley, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated v. STATE PERSONNEL COMMISSION, a body politic, Office of State Personnel, a body politic; Thomas H. … Moore, Treasurer of the State of North Carolina and Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the retirement System (in his official capacity); Temporary Solutions, a subdivision of the Office of the State Personnel, and State
Cited 1 timesPublished224 N.C. 834 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 3, 1945
Ashley v. Brown, 198 N. C., 369 , 151 S. E., 725 ; S. v. Pridgen, 151 N. 0., 651, 65 S. E., 617 . Hence, the applicable law would be that which was in force at the time of the acquisition of the property in 1899. … United States v. Unzeuta, supra.
Cited 6 timesPublished689 S.E.2d 876 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 21, 2009
689 S.E.2d 876 (2009) LIBERTARIAN PARTY, et al. v. STATE, et al. No. 479A09. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 21, 2009. Kenneth A. Soo, Raleigh, for Libertarian Party of NC. Robert M. … Peters, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State Board of Elections.
Cited 0 timesPublished145 N.C. 18 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 11, 1907
Brown on Statute of Frauds, sec. 354a, and cases cited. Such writings are sufficient evidence of the contract *20 to warrant the Court in giving effect to it. Mizell v. Burnett, 49 N. C., 254 . … Navigation Co. v. Bank, 47 U. S., 344 ; Ford v. Williams, 62 U. S., 287 .
Cited 15 timesPublished
Ask Donna