Case law

Southern Butane Gas Corp. v. Bullard

232 N.C. 730 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 29, 1950

Rader v. Coach Co., 225 N.C. 537 , 35 S.E. 2d 609 ; Fox v. Mills, Inc., 225 N.C. 580 , 35 S.E. 2d 869 ; Brown v. Truck Lines, 227 N.C. 65 , 40 S.E. 2d 476 ; Roach v. Prichett, 228 N.C. 747 , 47 S.E. 2d 20 ; Simmons v.

Southern Distributing Co. v. Carraway

189 N.C. 420 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 8, 1925

Bank v. … It is the act of the parties rather than that of the court” —Brown, J., in Belcher v. Cobb, 169 N. C., p. 694. See, also, Harrison v. Dill, 169 N. C., 545 ; Lynch v. Loftin, 153 N. C., 270 ; Henry v. Hilliard, 120 N.

Wood-Hopkins Contracting Co. v. North Carolina State Ports Authority

284 N.C. 732 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1974

Yates v. Brown, 275 N.C. 634 , 170 S.E. 2d 477 ; Root v. Insurance Co., 272 N.C. 580 , 158 S.E. 2d 829 ; Lester Bros., Inc. v. Thompson Co., 261 N.C. 210 , 134 S.E. 2d 372 ; Trust Co. v. … General Metals v. Manufacturing Co., 259 N.C. 709 , 131 S.E. 2d 360 ; Construction Co. v. Crain and Denbo, Inc., 256 N.C. 110 , 123 S.E. 2d 590 ; Bizzell v. Bizzell, 247 N.C. 590 , 101 S.E. 2d 668 .

Braddy v. . Elliott

146 N.C. 578 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 26, 1908

Brown, J. The plaintiffs owned a lot in Washington, two persons named Lee owning the reversion. … Touchstone, 123; Rawson v. Uxbridge, 7 Allen (Mass.), 125; 2 Washburn, p. 5.

Sanders v. . Sanders

157 N.C. 230 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 15, 1911

Martin v. Martin , 130 N.C. 28 . O'Connor v. O'Connor , 109 N.C. 142 ; Jackson v. Jackson , 105 N.C. 438 . But the facts as found by the court do not bring this case within the principle. … Speaking to this question in Taylor v. Taylor , 76 N.C. 436 , a case not unlike the present in its general aspects, the Court said: "The decisions of the Court in Coble v. Coble , and Erwin v.

Albemarle Lumber Co. v. Wilcox

105 N.C. 34 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1890

Avery, J. after stating the facts: We concur with the Judge below in the opinion that, if the testimony was true or was believed by the jury, the title to the lumber vested in the plaintiff when it was placed on board the … Waldo v. Belcher, 11 Ired., 609 ; Morgan v. Perkins, 1 Jones, 171 ; Cohen v. Stewart, 98 N. C., 97 ; May v. Gentry, 4 Dev. & Bat., 117 .

Wool v. Town of Edenton

117 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1895

was sufficient in substance, in Wool v. … It appears that the Board has regulated the line to which he might enter, and there is no allegation of fraud or collusion. 3.

State v. Boone.

132 N.C. 1107 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1903

In State v. Hayne, 88 N. … C., 1049 ; State v. Pigford, 117 N. C., 748 ; State v. Reams, 121 N. C., 556 ; State v. Brown, 125 N. C., 704 . Upon the facts stated in the special verdict, the defendant should have been adjudged guilty.

Crutchley v. Crutchley

293 S.E.2d 793 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1982

See Rowe v. Rowe, 305 N.C. 177 , 287 S.E.2d 840 (1982); Bunn v. Bunn, 262 N.C. 67 , 136 S.E.2d 240 (1964); G.S. § 50-16.9 (1976); G.S. §§ 52-10, 52-10.1 (1981 Cum.Supp.). See also White v. … Williams v. Williams, 261 N.C. 48 , 134 S.E.2d 227 (1964); Fuchs v. Fuchs, 260 N.C. 635 , 133 S.E.2d 487 (1963); Kiger v. Kiger, 258 N.C. 126 , 128 S.E.2d 235 .

Thomson v. Harnett County

209 N.C. 662 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 18, 1936

The second question: Under Article V, sec. 6, in Brooks v. Avery County, 206 N. … Commissioners v. Lacy, 174 N. C., 141 ; Ellis v. Greene, 191 N. C., 761 (766).

Frazier v. . Brownlow

38 N.C. 237 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1844

In Hulme v Tenant, 1 Bro. C. … That has been confidently questioned, and in Sperling v Rockfort, 8 Ves. 164, and Jones v Harris, 9 Ves.

Fowler v. Fowler.

59 L.R.A. 317 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 21, 1902

C., 494 , and Ury v. Brown, 129 N. C., 270 , and cases there cited. The defendant contends that, considering the caption of section 39, as *171 may be done, State v. Woolard, 119 N. … Nash v. Farrabow, 115 N. C., 303 ; Ladd v. Ladd, 121 N. C., 118 ; Cary v. Alle good, Ibid., 54.

Warner v. . Halyburton

187 N.C. 414 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 19, 1924

The case presented comes directly within the decisions of the Court in McCausland v. Construction Co., 172 N. C., 708 , and Mfg. Co. v. Andrews, 165 N. … James v. Charlotte, 183 N. C., 630 -632; S. v. R. R., 145 N. C., 495 -499. Whether the members as individuals may be held civilly liable to claimants is not before us, as they have not been sued in that capacity.

Kinsey v. City of Kinston

145 N.C. 106 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 2, 1907

M. of tbe same day, and at once, before closing tbe ditch, verbally notified City Inspector Brown to inspect tbe connections with tbe city sewer. … Bunch v. EdentOn, 90 N. C., 431 ; Russell v. Monroe, 116 N. C., 720 ; Fitzgerald v. Concord, 140 N. C., 113 .

Whitehurst v. . Padgett

157 N.C. 424 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 13, 1911

C., 188 ; Morrison v. Baker, 81 N. C., 80 ; Shepard v. Newton, 139 N. C., 536 ; Haun v. Burrell, 119 N. C., 547 ; Horne v. Bank, 108 N. … C., 119 ; Browne on Statute of Frauds, sec. 197; and the* authorities sustain the rules laid down by the court.

Smith v. Smith

226 N.C. 506 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 18, 1946

See King v. Rudd, ante, 156, 37 S. E. (2d), 116 , citing among others Rader v. Coach Co., 225 N. C., 537 , 35 S. E. (2d), 609 . See also Fox v. Mills, Inc., 225 N. C., 580 , 35 S. E. (2d), 869 ; Lee v. … Board of Adjustment, ante, 107, 37 S. E. (2d), 127 ; Redwine v. Clodfelter, ante, 366, 38 S. E. (2d), 203 ; In re Collins, ante, 412, 38 S. E. (2d), 160 .

Kistler v. Southern Railway Co.

164 N.C. 365 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 29, 1913

In Parker v. Bank, 152 N. … The Court has refused to entertain a controversy submitted to obtain the opinion of the Court upon the administration of the public school system, Board of Education v. Kenan, 112 N.

State v. Potts

334 N.C. 575 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 10, 1993

Brown v. Brown, 264 N.C. 485 , 14 S.E.2d 875 (1965). It could believe the defendant was the aggressor. This assignment of error is overruled. … State v. McDowell, 310 N.C. 61, 310 S.E.2d 301 (1984). In Maynard v.

Harris v. . Murphy

119 N.C. 34 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1896

Browne on Parol Ev., 99 ; Greenleaf Ev., 303 ; Swain v. Seamens, 9 Wallace, 271; Emerson v. Slater, 22 Howard, 41 . In the last cited case the Court cite the case of Goss v. … State v. Rogers, 93 N. C., 523 ; Anderson v. Steamboat Co., 64 N. C., 399 ; Weisenfield v. McLean, 96 N. C., 248 ; Jackson v. Commissioners, 76 N. C., 282 .

Davis v. Industrial Manufacturing Co.

114 N.C. 321 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1894

Brown v. Brittain, 84 N. C., 552 . … By the expression “coming to him after assignment” is meant purchased or otherwise acquired after the assignment, the principle announced being that decided by this Court in Brown v. Brittain, supra.