Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.22s
Brown v. Commissioners of Hertford
100 N.C. 92 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1888
White v. Commissioners, 90 N. C., 437 ; McCormac v. Commissioners , Ibid., 441; Dare County v. Currituck County, 95 N. C., 189 ; Mills v. Williams, 11 Ired., 558; Caldwell v. Justice, 4 Jones .Eq., 323; Wood v. … Wood v. Oxford, 97 N. C., 227 .
Cited 20 timesPublished826 S.E.2d 718 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 9, 2019
Cited 0 timesPublished137 N.C. 63 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 30, 1904
The State Board of Education has no hand in the apportionment of that money. It is the work entirely of the county boards of education. … to that apportioned by the county boards of education among the several townships.
Cited 5 timesPublished826 S.E.2d 714 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 9, 2019
Cited 0 timesPublished165 N.C. 435 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 29, 1914
Asheville v. Means, 29 N. C., 406 . To tbe same effect are Pullen v. Commissioners, 68 N. C., 451 ; S. v. Bean, 91 N. C., 554 ; Board v. County, 107 N. C., 110 ; S. v. Webbes, 109 N. C., 962 ; Barbee Asphalt Co. v. … Tbe charter fixed this, and tbe board bad no jurisdiction to enlarge it. In Spence v. Milwaukee, 113 N.
Cited 18 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Board of County Commissioners
189 N.C. 650 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 13, 1925
C., 341 ; Bennett v. Comrs., 125 N. C., 468 ; Brown v. Turner, 70 N. C., 93 ; Rogers v. Jenkins, 98 N. C., 129 ; Ducker v. Venable, 126 N. C., 447 ; Fisher v. Comrs., supra; Granville County Board v. … State Board, supra; Russell v. Ayer, supra; R. R. v. Jenkins, Treas., 68 N. C., 502 ; Kendall v. U. S., 12 Peters, 524 ; Barnes v. Comrs., supra; Burton v. Furman, supra; Cotton v. Ellis, 52 N. C., 545 ; Brown v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedSupreme Court of North Carolina · May 23, 2024
MidFirst Bank v. Brown, 286 N.C. App. 664, 668–69 (2022). … Oral Argument at 23:21, MidFirst Bank v. Brown (No. 14PA23) (Feb. 14, 2024). -8- MIDFIRST BANK V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown, Daniel & Co. v. Hawkins
65 N.C. 645 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1871
Hughes v. Person, 63 N. … If the papers were before the Judge as a foundation for the motion to-discharge the attachment on the counter affidavits filed by defendant, then the case falls under Clarke v. Clarke, 64 N. C. 150 .
Cited 10 timesPublished322 N.C. 605 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 30, 1988
Cited 0 timesPublished809 S.E.2d 598 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 1, 2018
Cited 0 timesPublished190 N.C. 848 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 16, 1925
Brown and her *Page 849 husband, C. W. Brown, who died in 1921. The defendants pleaded usury and a forfeiture of interest under C. S., 2306. The verdict was as follows: 1.
Cited 0 timesPublished300 N.C. 194 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 6, 1980
Cited 0 timesPublished182 N.C. 692 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 21, 1921
Cited 0 timesPublished325 N.C. 705 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 7, 1989
Cited 0 timesPublished301 N.C. 86 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 15, 1980
Cited 0 timesPublished285 N.C. 373 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 8, 1974
Cited 0 timesPublished284 N.C. 252 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1973
Cited 0 timesPublished244 N.C. 592 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 10, 1956
Cited 0 timesPublished190 N.C. 847 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 16, 1925
Brown and endorsed by her codefendants. Pleadings were duly filed, and at the trial the following verdict was returned: 1. Is the plaintiff the owner and holder of the note in due course?
Cited 0 timesPublished291 N.C. 710 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1977
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna