Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

0.62s

  • Raynor Ex Rel. Town of Louisburg v. Commissioners for the Town of Louisburg

    220 N.C. 348 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 19, 1941

    The governing board of a municipality cannot declare an emergency where none exists and thus defeat the provisions of a law. … Los Angeles Dredging Co. v. Long Beach, supra; Morgan v. Long Beach, 57 Cal. App., 134 , 207 Pac., 53 . To tbe contrary is Continental Construction Co. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hare v. . Hare

    228 N.C. 740 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1948

    Cooper v. Wyman, 122 N. C., 784 , 29 S. E., 947 ; Winder v. Penniman, 181 N. C., 8 , 105 S. E., 884 , 13 A. L. R., 364; Bangle v. Webb, 220 N. C., 423 , 17 S. E. (2d), 613 ; Current v. Webb, 220 N. C., 425 , 17 S. … Greenleaf v. People’s Bank, 133 N. C., 292 , 45 S. E., 638 ; Brown v. Taylor, 174 N. C., 423 , 93 S. E., 982 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Daniel v. Gardner

    240 N.C. 249 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 5, 1954

    Brown v. Hall, 226 N.C. 732 , 40 S.E. 2d 412 ; Hill v. Stansbury, 221 N.C. 339 , 20 S.E. 2d 308 . As bearing upon the interpretation and application of this statute, these propositions may be taken as established: 1. … Dixie Lines v. Grannick, 238 N.C. 552 , 78 S.E. 2d 410 ; Council v. Dickerson’s, Inc., supra; Whitlow v. R. R., 217 N.C. 558 , 8 S.E. 2d 809 ; Hildebrand v. Telegraph Co., 216 N.C. 235 , 4 S.E. 2d 439 . 3.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • State v. Oliver

    309 N.C. 326 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 27, 1983

    State v. Brown, 306 N.C. 151 , 293 S.E. 2d 569 , cert. denied, — U.S. ---, 74 L.Ed. 2d 642 (1982); State v. … State v. Kirkley, 308 N.C. 196 , 302 S.E. 2d 144 (1983); State v. Brown, 306 N.C. 151 , 293 S.E. 2d 569 ; State v.

    Cited 181 timesPublished
  • Saunders v. . Gatling

    81 N.C. 298 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1879

    Such is the construction which has been given to these sections of the code by numerous decisions of this court: Patterson v. Hubbs, 65 N. C., 119 ; Tuck v. Hunt, 73 N. C., 24; People v. Hilliard, 72 N. … C., 169 ; People v. McKee, 68 N. C., 429 ; Brown v. Turner, 70 N. *302 C., 93. One of the head-notes to this last case is calculated to mislead.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • In Re the Vanderbilt University for Judicial Review of the Administrative Decision of the Tax Review Board Relating to North Carolina Income & Franchise Tax Assessments

    252 N.C. 743 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 10, 1960

    Odd Fellows v. Swain, 217 N.C. 632 , 9 S.E. 2d 365 ; Rockingham County v. Elon College, 219 N.C. 342 , 13 S.E. 2d 618 ; Guilford College v. Guilford County, 219 N.C. 347 , 13 S.E. 2d 622 ; Sparrow v. … Cannon v. Maxwell, Com’r. of Revenue, 205. N.C. 420, 171 S.E. 624 ; Powell v. Maxwell, Com’r. of Revenue, 210 N.C. 211 , 186 S.E. 326 ; Knitting Mills v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Isler v. . Murphy

    83 N.C. 215 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1880

    Rogers v. McKenzie, 81 N. C., 164 , and the authorities therein cited. … Ferebee v. Insurance Co., 68 N. C., 11 ; Brown v. Brooks, 7 Jones, 93 ; Wade v. Carter, 76 N. C., 171 ; Wilson v. Derr, 69 N. C., 137 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sears v. Sears

    253 N.C. 415 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 23, 1960

    Arrington v. Arrington, 127 N.C. 190 , 37 S.E. 212 ; Jenkins v. Jenkins, 225 N.C. 681 , 36 S.E. 2d 233 ; Howland v. Stitzer, 231 N.C. 528 , 58 S.E. 2d 104 ; Barber v. … In Barber v. Barber, supra, and Kinross-Wright v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Reid

    230 N.C. 561 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 16, 1949

    S. v. Hooper, 227 N.C. 633 , 44 S.E. 2d 42 ; S. v. Allen, supra; S. v. McDaniel, 60 N.C. 245 ; S. v. Boon, supra. … Ewing, 227 N.C. 535 , 42 S.E. 2d 676 ; S. v. McKinnon, 223 N.C. 160 , 25 S.E. 2d 606 ; S. v. Brown, 218 N.C. 415 , 11 S.E. 2d 321 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Burton v. Durham Realty & Insurance

    188 N.C. 473 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 29, 1924

    Kistler v. R. R., 164 N. C., 365 ; Parker v. Bank, 152 N. C., 253 ; Board of Education v. Kenan, 112 N. C., 567 ; Millikan v. Fox, 84 N. C., 107 ; Blake v. Askew, 76 N. C., 325 ; Bates v. Lilly, 65 N. C., 232 . … Speaking to a similar situation, in McKethan v. Ray, 71 N. C., 165 , Pearson, C. J., said: “Our construction of section 315, C. C. P. (now C.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Hilley v. Blue Ridge Insurance

    235 N.C. 544 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 7, 1952

    Co. v. … Co. v. Haggard (Court of Civil Appeals of Texas), 168 S.W. 1011 ; Superior Lloyd's of America v. Loan Co. (1941) (Texas), 153 S.W. 2d 973 ; Remedial System v. Ins. Co., 227 Ky. 652 , 13 S.W. 2d 1005 ; Brown v. Fire Ins.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Dougherty v. . Sprinkle

    88 N.C. 300 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1883

    See Fisher v. Webb, supra; Murphy v. McNeill, 82 N. C., 221 ; McAdoo v. Callum, 86 N. C., 419 ; Lutz v. Thompson, 87 N. … In Hulme v. Tenant, 1 Brown C.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • City of Elizabeth v. Aydlett

    201 N.C. 602 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 10, 1931

    Metzenbaum’s The Law of Zoning, 150, et seq.; Welch v. Swasey, 214 U. S., 91 , 53 L. Ed., 923 ; Hadacheck v. Sebastian, 239 U. S., 394 , 60 L. Ed., 348 ; Zahn v. Board of Public Works, 274 U. S., 325 , 71 L. … Zahn v. Board of Public Works, supra; S. v. Hillman, supra; The Law of Zoning, 71. In support of the principle that ordinances must be uniform the appellant cites Bizzell v. Goldsboro, 192 N. C., 348 , Clinton v.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Matter of Alamance County Ct. Facilities

    329 N.C. 84 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 12, 1991

    E.g., Board of Com’rs v. … See, e.g., In re Board of Commissioners, 4 N.C.

    Cited 52 timesPublished
  • State v. Cortez

    718 S.E.2d 372 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 25, 2011

    718 S.E.2d 372 (2011) STATE v. CORTEZ, Lowry, Atkinson, and Barnes. No. 200P11-1. Supreme Court of North Carolina. August 25, 2011. Rod Malone, Raleigh, for Johnston County Board of Education. Paul T.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • MacClure v. Accident & Casualty Insurance

    230 N.C. 661 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 28, 1949

    Parsons v. Board of Education, 200 N.C. 795 , 156 S.E. 163 ; Gooch v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 196 N.C. 823 , 146 S.E. 803 . Affirmed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Burton v. Wilmington & Weldon Railroad

    82 N.C. 504 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1880

    Kesler v. Smith, supra; Railroad v. Brown, 5 Wall., 90 ; Chicago & Rock Island R. R. v. Morris, 26 Ill., 400 ; Balt. & Ohio R. R. Co. v. … The true rule on this subject is laid down in Bynum v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Stanford v. . Ellington

    117 N.C. 159 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1895

    Prior to 13 March, 1895, the Board of Trustees of the State Library under existing law elected to and filled this office. … Cited: Day's case , 124 N.C. 383 ; Cherry v. Burns, ib. , 766. (164)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. . Hinson

    103 N.C. 374 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1889

    In Flynt v. Bodenhamer, 80 N. C., 205 , it is said, and approved in Branton v. O’Briant, 93 N. C., 99 , and repeated in State v. Cole, 94 N. … The subject has been recently considered in State v. Brown, 100 N. C., 519; that we are content, without comment, to refer to. There is no error, and the judgment is affirmed. No error. Affirmed.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Ex parte Wilds

    182 N.C. 705 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 21, 1921

    In Church v. Ange, 161 N. … Lackland v. Walker, 52 N. W., 422 ; Brown v. Baptist Society, 9 R. I., 184; Stanly v. Colt, 72 U. S., 119 ; Jones v. Habersham, 107 U. S., 183 ; Fisher v. Fisher, 170 N. C., 381 . Tbe judgment is Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.