Case law

Advisory Opinion In re Sales-Tax Election of 1969

275 N.C. 683 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 25, 1969

Chapter 1200 of the Session Laws of 1969 (H.B. 331) is an Act to amend the Constitution of North Carolina to revise Article V concerning State and local finance. … question submitted to the voters of the State at large by the State Board of Elections.

Cox v. City of Kinston

217 N.C. 391 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 1940

S. v. Harris, 216 N. C., 746 . … E., 972 (dealing witb certiorari as a substitute for appeal from action of the board of county commissioners in refusing license to retail intoxicating liquors).

Mitchell v. . R. R.

176 N.C. 645 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 11, 1918

Under these circumstances, it was not illegal for him to board the work train with Mr. Byrd's permission. … Co. v. Derby , 14 How., 468 ; Steamboat Co. v. King , 16 How., 469 . There are other authorities cited in McNeill v. R. R.

Perry v. City of High Point

218 N.C. 714 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1940

Perry, > NOTICE OF CLAIM v. I City of High Point. … Graham v. Charlotte, 186 N. C., 649 ; Ivester v. Winston-Salem, 215 N. C., 1 .

Glenn v. . Wray

126 N.C. 730 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 29, 1900

Bank v. Commissioners, 119 N. C., 214 ; Commissioners v. Snuggs, 121 N. C., 394 ; Mayo v. Commissioners, 122 N. C., 5 ; Rodman v. Washington, Ibid, 39; Charlotte v. Sheppard, Ibid, 602; Commissioners v. Call, 123 N. … Norment v. Charlotte, 85 N. C., 387 ; Duke v. Brown, 96 N. C., 127 ; Wood v. Oxford, 97 N. C., 227 ; Railroad v. Commissioners, 109 N. C., 159 .

State v. . Holt

192 N.C. 490 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 10, 1926

S. v. Burke, 73 N. C., 83 ; S. v. Brown, 113 N. C., 645 . It is obvious, therefore, that tbe crime charged in tbe bill of indictment includes an assault against tbe person, and, this being true, tbe statute, C. … S. v. Merrick, 1 71 N. C., 788 ; S. v. Allen, 186 N. C., 302 ; S. v. Efird, 186 N. C., 482 .

Emory v. Gas Steamer "Clinton"

187 N.C. 167 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 20, 1924

This case was before the Court in Emory v. Credle, 185 N. C., 3 . In that ease the Court held that, under section 4282, *168 U. S. … Revised Statutes, which, exempts the owner of any vessel from liability for loss or damage to any merchandise in being transported on his vessel by means of any fire occurring on board the vessel “unless such fire is caused

CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. Funderburg

264 N.C. 131 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 24, 1965

Fertilizer Co. v. Eason, 194 N.C. 244 , 139 S.E. 376 ; Brown v. Taylor, 174 N.C. 423 , 93 S.E. 982 ; Storm v. United States, 94 U.S. 76 , 24 L. Ed. 42 ; 17 Am. Jur. 2d 452.

Bushnell v. Bertolett

153 N.C. 564 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 7, 1910

Brown, J. Tbis action is brought for the purpose of charging the estate of the feme defendant with the sum of $330.75 for a breach of contract in refusing to take and pay for a lot of apple trees. … This is in conformity with a uniform line of decisions many in number beginning with Harris v. Jenkins, 72 N. C., 183 , and ending with Bank v. Benbow, 150 N. C., 782 . Reversed.

Bryant v. . Carrier

214 N.C. 191 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 28, 1938

Moore v. Horne, 153 N. C., 413 , 69 S. E., 409 ; Ballinger v. Rader, 153 N. C., 488 , 69 S. E., 491 ; Jewell v. Colby, 66 N. H., 399; 32 C. J., 751. … E., 72 ; McLeary v. Norment, 84 N.

Underwood v. Coburn Motor Car Co.

166 N.C. 458 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 16, 1914

BrowN, J. This action is brought to recover damages from the defendant for an alleged breach of warranty in the sale of an E. M. F. car. … Critcher v. Porter, 135 N. C., 543 ; Kester v. Miller, 119 N. C., 475 ; Mfg. Co. v. Gray, 126 N. C., 108 .

State v. Egerton

264 N.C. 328 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1965

In State v. Bonner, 222 N.C. 344 , 23 S.E. 2d 45 ; State v. Norton, 222 N.C. 418 , 23 S.E. 2d 301 , and State v. Dyer, 239 N.C. 713 , 80 S.E. 2d 769 , separate trials were required. The parties were separately charged. … G.S. 15-41; State v. Brown, ante 191. The officers took the suspects to the police station and placed them in separate cells for interrogation.

Parris v. . Fischer Co.

219 N.C. 292 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 19, 1941

Brown v. Coal Co. , 208 N.C. 50 , 178 S.E. 858 . This necessitates an examination of the record to determine if there was evidence of facts sufficient to sustain the ruling. … Alexander , 227 U.S. 218 ; Browning v. Waycross , 233 U.S. 16 ; Case v. Mills Novelty Co. , 193 So. 625 ; Clement v. Coon , 161 Okla. 216 ; International Shoe Co. v. Lovejoy , 257 N.W. 576 ; Grams v.

McKinney v. . Matthews

166 N.C. 576 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 7, 1914

Harris v. Murphy, 119 N. C., 34 ; Freeman v. Bell, 150 N. C., 148 . … In Brown v. Lumber Co., 117 N.

State Ex Rel. East Lenoir Sanitary District v. City of Lenoir

249 N.C. 96 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 29, 1958

G.S. 1-57; In re Pupil Assignment, 247 N.C. 413 ; Joyner v. Board of Education, 244 N.C. 164 , 92 S.E. 2d 795 ; Lipe v. Bank, 236 N.C. 328 , 72 S.E. 2d 759 ; Thomas v. … Moore v. Board of Education, 212 N.C. 499 , 193 S.E. 732 ; Saluda v. Polk County, 207 N.C. 180 , 176 S.E. 298 ; Starmount Co. v. Hamilton Lakes, 205 N.C. 514 , 171 S.E. 909 ; Matthews v.

Coble v. . Coble

55 N.C. 392 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1856

Earp v. Earp, 1 Jones’ Eq. Rep. 239. The third section of the act referred to specifies several distinct things, the doing of either of which by a husband will entitle his wife to a partial divorce, and to alimony. … She charges that her husband, upon the most frivolous and groundless pretences, accused her of a criminal intimacy with a young physician who boarded in the family, and manifested, by his language and conduct, contempt and

Stanback v. Stanback

270 N.C. 497 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 20, 1967

Five issues were submitted to the jury in plaintiff’s action for divorce from bed and board. The first related to the marriage, which was admitted. … To obtain a divorce from bed and board, however, the law requires that defendant establish only one of the grounds specified in G.S. 50-7.

Southern Railway Co. v. Cherokee County

177 N.C. 86 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 3, 1919

Board of Education v. Comrs., 111 N. C., 580 . … Trull v. Comrs., 72 N. C., 388 ; Clifton v. Wynne, 80 N. C., 145 ; Mauney v. Comrs., supra.” Cromartie v. Comrs., 87 N. C., 139 .

Steele v. . Beaty

215 N.C. 680 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 31, 1939

. & Proe., p. 699; 2 Arch Practice, 250; 7 Bacon’s Abridgement, 215; State Medical Examining Board v. Stewart, 13 Ann. Cases, 653; Crossman v. Davis, 79 Calif., 603; Commonwealth Bank v. … State Medical Examining Board v. Stewart, supra; Crossman v. Davis, supra; Commonwealth Bank v. Hopkins, supra; United States v. Parker, supra; Meyer v. Fenner, 204 N. C., 802 ; Cason v. Shute, 211 N. C., 195 , 189 S.

Sprinkle v. . Foote

71 N.C. 411 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1874

For title, Foote relied on a judgment obtained in the County Court of Rowan County, at _____ term, 186 ___, in favor of one Brown against the defendant, B. P. Martin and the plaintiff, O. … Cited: S. v. Debnam , 98 N.C. 719 ; Withers v. Lane , 144 N.C. 190 ; Speed v. Perry , 167 N.C. 128 ; S. v. Rogers , 173 N.C. 758 ; S. v. Hart , 186 N.C. 588 .