Case law

Murphy v. . Murphy

202 N.C. 394 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1932

He signaled the car and it stopped and he boarded it. … Quantz v. R. R. , 137 N.C. 136 , 49 S.E. 79 ; Jones v. R. R. , 199 N.C. 1 , 153 S.E. 637 ; Gibbs v. R. R. , 200 N.C. 49 , *Page 397 156 S.E. 138 . Directly in point is the declaration of law in Willis v. R.

Tate v. Bates

118 N.C. 287 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1896

The same point was raised in Solomon v. Bates and Caldwell v. … Hauser v. Tate, 85 N. C., 81 ; Morse on Banks, Sec. 131; Finn v. Brown, 142 U. S.; United Society v. Underwood, 9 Bush., (Ky.,) 609, and other eases cited in Solomon v. Bates, at this Term.

Vance v. Railroad

138 N.C. 460 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 23, 1905

In Hutchins v. … “Speaking strictly,” says the court in Brown v. Railroad, (Ky.) 30 S.

Helme v. . Sanders

10 N.C. 563 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1825

And he ought to use ordinary diligence to collect it. 2 Brown, 186, Bac. Ab., Executor, B. 2. … Arnold v. Lanier , 4 N.C. 143 , decides this case. That was an action of deceit, brought against an executor for the deceit of the testator in selling an unsound slave.

Graves v. . Causey

170 N.C. 175 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1915

Alexander v. Gibbons, 118 N. C., 796 ; Faggard v. Bost, 122 N. C., 523 ; Brown v. Morisey, 124 N. C., 296 . … Everett v. Newton, 118 N. C., 921 ; Malloy v. Bruden, 86 N. C., 258 . As Robert Causey and his grantee, J. ~W.

Cherry v. Roanoke Tobacco Warehouse Co.

237 N.C. 362 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 18, 1953

Moreover, in Byrd v. … In the light of these principles, the course and distance of the second call may be controlled by proof of the location of “the driveway of the Roanoke-Dixie Warehouse,” Brown v.

J. F. White Co. v. Carroll

146 N.C. 230 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 4, 1907

Perry v. White, 111 N. C., 197 ; Brown v. Dail, 117 N. C., 41 . … Dempsey v. Rhodes, 93 N. C., 120 ; Kerchner v. Riley, 72 N. C., 171 ; McMillan v. Baker, 92 N. C., 110 ; Corn v. Stepp, 84 N. C., 599 . We do not find any inconsistency between the complaint and the reply.

Quelch v. . Futch

172 N.C. 316 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 25, 1916

A reference to another deed may control a particular description, for the deed referred to for purposes of description becomes a part of tbe deed tbat calls for it. 13 Cyc., 632; Brown v. Ricaud, 107 N. … Rutherford v. Lacy, 48 Mo., 325 ; Jackson v. Barringer, 15 Johns (N. Y.), 471; Lodge v. Lee, 6 Cranch (U. S.), 237; 13 Cyc., p. 634, note 14. Prentice v. R. R., 154 U.

Jones v. . Spaight

4 N.C. 157 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1814

NOTE. — See Bryan v. Deberry , 3 N.C. 356 , and the cases and act of Assembly referred to in the note. Cited: Miller v. Williams , 19 N.C. 501 ; Zollicoffer v. Zollicoffer , 20 N.C. 577 ; Ward v. … Jones , 40 N.C. 406 ; Buchanan v. Buchanan , 99 N.C. 311 , 314 ; Whitfield v. Garris , 134 N.C. 29 . *Page 127

Jenette v. Hovey & Co.

182 N.C. 30 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 14, 1921

Sheldon v. Kivett, 110 N. C., 408 ; Roulhac v. Brown, 87 N. C., 1; Judd v. Mining Co., 120 N. C., 397 . … Mills v. Hansel, 168 N. C., 651 ; Armstrong v. Kinsell, 164 N. C., 125 ; Currie *33 v. Mining Co., 157 N. C., 217 ; Grocery Co. v. Bag Co., 142 N. C., 174 , and Best v. Mortgage Co., 128 N. C., 351 .

Nichols v. . Town of Fountain

165 N.C. 166 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 11, 1914

Coley v. Statesville, 121 N. C., 301 ; *169 Shields v. Durham, 116 N. C., 394 ; Moffitt v. Asheville, 103 N. C., 237 ; McIlhenny v. Wilmington, 127 N. C., 146 ; Hines v. Rocky Mount, 162 N. C., 411 . … Applying these principles, it was held by the Supreme Court of West Virginia in Brown, administrator, v. Town of Guyandotte, 12 S.

Allen v. . Hewitt

212 N.C. 367 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1937

Sessoms v. Sessoms, 144 N. C., 121 , citing Cox v. Marks, 27 N. C., 361 ; King v. Utley, 85 N. C., 59 ; Robeson v. Moore, 168 N. C., 388 ; Waller v. Brown, 197 N. C., 508 . … Jones v. Whichard, 163 N. C., 241 ; Price v. Griffin, 150 N. C., 523 ; Edgerton v. Aycock, 123 N. C., 134 ; Chamblee v. Broughton, 120 N. C., 170 ; Starnes v. Hill, 112 N. C., 1 ; Bank v. Dortch, 186 N.

Ferebee v. Norfolk Southern Railroad

163 N.C. 351 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 29, 1913

R. v. M. T. Claud, admx., 57 Kansas, 40; Maynard v. Oregon R. R., 46 Oregon, 15; Statler v. Ray Manufacturing Co., 195 N. Y., 478 ; Pittsburg R. R. v. Story, 63 Ill. App., 239 ; Keyes v. … Ry., 36 Minn., 290 ; Brown, receiver, v. Sullivan, 70 Texas, 470 ; 1 Sedgwick on Damages (9 Ed.), sec. 439. For the error indicated there must be a new trial on the issue of damages, and it is so ordered.

Robinson v. . McAlhaney

216 N.C. 674 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 3, 1940

E., 182 ; Davis v. Lumber Co., 190 N. C., 873 , 130 S. E., 156 ; Mfg. Co. v. Hodgins, 192 N. C., 577 , 135 S. E., 466 ; Moses v. Morganton, 195 N. C., 92 , 141 S. E., 484 ; Mayo v. Comrs., 196 N. C., 15 , 144 S. … E., 925 ; Ingle v. Green, 199 N. C., 149 , 154 S. E., 83 ; S. c., 202 N. C., 116 , 162 S. E., 476 ; Masten v. Texas Co., 204 N. C., 569 , 169 S. E., 142 ; Power Co. v. Yount, 208 N. C., 182 , 179 S. E., 804 ; Betts v.

Kerr v. Hicks.

133 N.C. 175 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 15, 1903

The defendant merely excepted to the order of Judge Brown at a subsequent term amending the record to show that the plaintiff had excepted to the reference at the time it was made. “2. … Cecil v. Henderson, 121 N. C., 244 ; Patterson v. Mills, Ibid., 258; Kendricks v. Ins. Co., 124 N. C., 315 ; 70 Am,. St. Rep., 592. Besides, the issues were settled by the Court without exception from the defendant.

Bailey v. Carolina Power & Light Co.

212 N.C. 768 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 2, 1938

directors of the corporation is challenged, on the principle of Gorrell v. … See Alabama Power Company v. Harold L. Idees, as Federal Hmergency Administrator of Public Works, decided at October Term, 1937, of the Supreme Court of the United States.

State's Prison v. Hoffman & Bros.

159 N.C. 564 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1912

Brown, J. In this action plaintiff seeks to recover balance due on 10,475 bushels of peanuts, sold to defendants, who pleaded a breach of contract by way of counterclaim. … Waldo v. Belcher, 33 N. C., 609 . Then plaintiff became a mere accommodation bailee without hire, and required to exercise only slight care.

State v. . Chavis

80 N.C. 353 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1879

State v. Craton, 6 Ire. 164; State v. Langford, Bush., 436; State v. Collins, 8 Ire., 407’ The second, because there is no necessity for entering a sim-iliter on the record. It may be done ore teams. State v. … State v. Rash, 12 Ire., 382; Brown v. Patton, 13 Ire., 446; State v. Peace, 1 Jones, 251 ; State v. Haney, 2 Dev. and Bat., 390. 5.

In Re the Vanderbilt University for Judicial Review of the Administrative Decision of the Tax Review Board Relating to North Carolina Income & Franchise Tax Assessments

252 N.C. 743 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 10, 1960

Odd Fellows v. Swain, 217 N.C. 632 , 9 S.E. 2d 365 ; Rockingham County v. Elon College, 219 N.C. 342 , 13 S.E. 2d 618 ; Guilford College v. Guilford County, 219 N.C. 347 , 13 S.E. 2d 622 ; Sparrow v. … Cannon v. Maxwell, Com’r. of Revenue, 205. N.C. 420, 171 S.E. 624 ; Powell v. Maxwell, Com’r. of Revenue, 210 N.C. 211 , 186 S.E. 326 ; Knitting Mills v.

Ware v. Southern Railway Co.

175 N.C. 501 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 8, 1918

Whitley v. R. R., 122 N. C., 987 ; Clark v. Traction Co. (Brown, J.), 138 N. C., 77 ; Miller v. R. R., 128 N. C., 26 ; Chesson v. Lumber Co., 118 N. C., 59 . … Brown, J., in Clark v. Traction Co., 138 N. C., 77 .