Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

0.41s

  • Kerr v. Hicks.

    133 N.C. 175 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 15, 1903

    The defendant merely excepted to the order of Judge Brown at a subsequent term amending the record to show that the plaintiff had excepted to the reference at the time it was made. “2. … Cecil v. Henderson, 121 N. C., 244 ; Patterson v. Mills, Ibid., 258; Kendricks v. Ins. Co., 124 N. C., 315 ; 70 Am,. St. Rep., 592. Besides, the issues were settled by the Court without exception from the defendant.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Cain v. Corbett

    235 N.C. 33 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 1, 1952

    See also Borders v. Cline, 212 N.C. 472 , 193 S.E. 826 . Blake v. Allen, 221 N.C. 445 , 19 S.E. 2d 871 , and Towe v. Yancey County, 224 N.C. 579 , 31 S.E. 2d 754 . … Boone v. Boone, 217 N.C. 722 , 9 S.E. 2d 383 , and cases there cited. See also Chipley v. Morrell, 228 N.C. 240 , 45 S.E. 2d 149 , and Canestrino v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Withers v. Black

    230 N.C. 428 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 25, 1949

    Lumberton, 215 N.C. 752 , 3 S.E. 2d 324 ; Pickard v. Plaid Mills, 213 N.C. 28 , 195 S.E. 28 ; Holmes v. Brown Co., 207 N.C. 785 , 178 S.E. 569 ; Winberry v. Farley Stores, Inc., 204 N.C. 79 , 167 S.E. 475 ; Conrad v. … Ed.), section 1560; Brown v. Aluminum Co., 224 N.C. 766 , 32 S.E. 2d 320 ; Conrad v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Graves v. . Causey

    170 N.C. 175 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1915

    Alexander v. Gibbons, 118 N. C., 796 ; Faggard v. Bost, 122 N. C., 523 ; Brown v. Morisey, 124 N. C., 296 . … Everett v. Newton, 118 N. C., 921 ; Malloy v. Bruden, 86 N. C., 258 . As Robert Causey and his grantee, J. ~W.

    Declined to follow by Marlowe v. Clark, 112 N.C. App. 181 (1993)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • People Ex Rel. Worley v. Smith

    81 N.C. 304 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1879

    Sneed v. Bullock, 80 N. C., 132 . … Sneed v. Bullock, ■supra.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Featherstone v. Pass

    232 N.C. 349 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1950

    Shelton, 229 N.C. 150 , 48 S.E. 2d 41 ; Trust Co. v. Board of National Missions, 226 N.C. 546 , 39 S.E. 2d 621 ; Cannon v. Cannon, 225 N.C. 611 , 36 S.E. 2d 17 ; Williams v. Rand, 223 N.C. 734 , 28 S.E. 2d 247 . … of Regents v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Perry v. . Bassenger

    219 N.C. 838 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 28, 1941

    Johnson v. Farlow , 35 N.C. 84 ; Wilson v. Brown , 134 N.C. 400 , 46 S.E. 762 . In Greenleaf v. … Bartlett , 146 N.C. 495 , 60 S.E. 419 , this Court adopted the dissenting views of Chief Justice Taney and Justice Catron in Moore v. Brown , 11 How.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Benton v. C. G. Willis, Inc.

    252 N.C. 166 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1960

    Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. R., 352 U. S. 500 , 1 L. ed. 2d 493. In Butler v. … In that case the negligence principally relied on was failure to provide a gangplank for use of the crew in boarding and leaving the vessel. See also, Schulz v. Pennsylvania R.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Hurst

    360 N.C. 181 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 27, 2006

    Brown, 315 N.C. at 62 , 337 S.E.2d at 825 . … State v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Person v. Leary.

    127 N.C. 114 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1900

    In Insurance Co. v. Edwards, 124 N. … In two affidavits filed by the defendants, one Andrew Brown says: “Affiant is informed that the receivers took charge of the Bank of Commerce during December, 1896.”.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Leggette v. J. D. McCotter, Inc.

    265 N.C. 617 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1965

    In Weaver v. Bennett, 259 N.C. 16 , 129 S.E. 2d 610 , a statement from Nepstad v. … The Court of Appeals of New York reversed the Appellate Division and affirmed the award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. In the case of Mendel v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Frederickson Motor Express Lines

    195 N.C. 682 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 23, 1928

    This Court in Harrison v. Transit Co., 192 N. … Dunn v. Jones, ante, 354; Brown v. Auto Service Co., ante, 647. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, we must hold that the statute prohibits the joinder of the assurer and the assured.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Brady

    238 N.C. 404 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 14, 1953

    See S. v. Suddreth, 223 N.C. 610 , 27 S.E. 2d 623 ; S. v. Watts, 224 N.C. 771 , 32 S.E. 2d 348 ; S. v. Wilson, 227 N.C. 43 , 40 S.E. 2d 449 ; S. v. Barnhardt, 230 N.C. 223 , 52 S.E. 2d 904 ; S. v. … S. v. Freeman, 49 N.C. 5 ; S. v. Alson, supra. See also S. v. Brown, 202 N.C. 221 , 162 S.E. 216 . III.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Pender v. . Speight

    159 N.C. 612 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 25, 1912

    Brown, J. … Jur., sec. 1252; Drury v. Cross, 7 Wall., 299 ; Hill v. Lumber Co., 113 N. C., 172 ; Harvey’s Eights of Minority Stockholders, 13; and McIver v. Hardware Co., 144 N. C., 485 .

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Clarke v. . Carpenter

    81 N.C. 309 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1879

    At the regular election held in August last, pursuant to section 77 of the act of March 12, 1877, the defendant was elected clerk of the superior court of Craven, and before the board of county commissioners, at their meeting … In Buckman v. Com’rs of Beaufort, 80 N.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ware v. Southern Railway Co.

    175 N.C. 501 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 8, 1918

    Whitley v. R. R., 122 N. C., 987 ; Clark v. Traction Co. (Brown, J.), 138 N. C., 77 ; Miller v. R. R., 128 N. C., 26 ; Chesson v. Lumber Co., 118 N. C., 59 . … Brown, J., in Clark v. Traction Co., 138 N. C., 77 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State's Prison v. Hoffman & Bros.

    159 N.C. 564 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1912

    Brown, J. In this action plaintiff seeks to recover balance due on 10,475 bushels of peanuts, sold to defendants, who pleaded a breach of contract by way of counterclaim. … Waldo v. Belcher, 33 N. C., 609 . Then plaintiff became a mere accommodation bailee without hire, and required to exercise only slight care.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kinney v. Sutton

    230 N.C. 404 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 11, 1949

    Lee v. Board of Adjustment, 226 N.C. 107 , 37 S.E. 2d 128 ; In re Appeal of Parker, 214 N.C. 51 , 197 S.E. 706 ; Elizabeth City v. Aydlett, 201 N.C. 602, 161 S.E. 78 ; S. v. … Lee v. Board of Adjustment, supra; Elizabeth City v. Aydlett, supra.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Pasquotank County v. Hood Ex Rel. Savings Bank & Trust Co.

    209 N.C. 552 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 26, 1936

    It was urged in the oral argument and by brief that the pledge of the securities on 18 December, 1930, was not authorized by the board of directors of the bank, nor accepted by the board of county commissioners. … Bond v. Cotton Mills, 166 N. C., 20 ; Hannah v. Hyatt, 170 N. C., 634 ; S. v. Martin, 188 N. C., 119 ; S. v. Gant, 201 N. C., 211 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Atkins v. Walker

    284 N.C. 306 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1973

    In Reid v. … See also, Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1, 16 , 67 S.Ct. 504 , 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947).

    Cited 30 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.