Case law

State v. Cobb

164 N.C. 418 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 24, 1913

Brown, J. There are sixty exceptions in tbe case on appeal. … Bank v. Carr, 130 N. C., 481 ; Crenshaw v. Johnson, 120 N. C., 271 .

Simpson v. . Nadeau

1 N.C. 332 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1801

The case states that she was taken by a privateer commissioned by the Republic of France, "under the pretense of a prize"; that she had no register on board. … Hallett v. Lamothe , 7 N.C. 279 .

Long v. . Fields

104 N.C. 221 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1889

Bullinger v. Marshall , 70 N.C. 520 ; Ashe v. Gray , 88 N.C. 190 ; ib . (rehearing), 90 N.C. 137 ; Harvey v. Hambright , 98 N.C. 446 . Affirmed. Cited: Bowers v. R. R. , 107 N.C. 722 ; Fields v. Brown , 160 N.C. 300 .

Griffin v. . Williams

44 N.C. 292 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1853

Burgess was the captain of the schooner Belle, on board of which the lumber was at the time of the levy; and the constable who made the levy testified that at the time he did so, Burgess claimed an interest in the property … The cases of Meyer v. Tharpe , 5 Taun. Rep., 74; Smith v. Watson , Barn. Cres., 401 (9 Eng. C. L. Rep., 122); Ex Parte Hamper , 17 Ves. Jun., 404; Reid v. Austin , 17 Mas. Rep., 197 , and Turner v. Bissell , 14 Pick.

Barbee v. Edwards

238 N.C. 215 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 23, 1953

Crook v. Warren, 212 N.C. 93 , 192 S.E. 684 ; Saleeby v. Brown, 190 N.C. 138 , 129 S.E. 424 ; Stevens v. Turlington, *219 186 N.C. 191 , 119 S.E. 210 ; Walker v. … Maddox v. Brown, 233 N.C. 519 , 64 S.E. 2d 864 .

In Re Disabarment of West

212 N.C. 189 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 13, 1937

Compare Board of Medical Examiners v. Gardner, 201 N. C., 123 , 159 S. E., 8 ; S. v. Carroll, 194 N. C., 37 , 138 S. E., 339 ; Mann v. Board of Optometry Examiners, 206 N. C., 853 , 175 S. E., 281 . … Diamond v. Service Stores, 211 N. C., 632 ; Lincoln v. R. R., 207 N. C., 787 , 178 S. E., 601 .

Blow v. . Vaughan

105 N.C. 198 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1890

Harrell v. Butler, 92 N. C., 20 ; Allen v. Chambers, 4 Ired. Eq., 126 ; Grier v. Rhyne, 69 N. C., 346 : Wharton v. Elborn, 88 N. C., 345 ; Capps v. Holt, 5 Jones Eq, 153; Dickens v. Barnes, 79 N. C., 490 ; Hinchey v. … In Brown v. Coble, 76 N. C., 391 , the description of the land as “ that John Brown, ancestor of the petitioner, died seized of and possessed of a tract of land in said county of Guilford, on the waters of Stinking.

State v. CORTEZ, LOWRY, ATKINSON, AND BARNES

365 N.C. 336 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 26, 2011

708 S.E.2d 717 (2011) STATE v. CORTEZ, LOWRY, ATKINSON, AND BARNES. No. 200P11-1. Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 26, 2011. Rod Malone, for Johnson County Board of Education. *718 Paul T.

State v. Cooke

246 N.C. 518 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 28, 1957

S. v. Simpson, 12 N.C. 504 ; S. v. McCauless, 31 N.C. 375 ; S. v. Ray, 32 N.C. 39 ; S. v. Laney, 87 N.C. 535 ; S. v. Davenport, 156 N.C. 597 , 72 S.E. 7 . … .); Brown v. State, 85 S.E. 262 (Ga.); 87 C.J.S. 1113; 42 C.J.S. 1054; 27 Am. Jur. 649 .

In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge Nowell

293 N.C. 235 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 12, 1977

In re Diener, supra; In re Kelly, 238 So. 2d 565, 569 (Fla. 1970); Sharpe v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association, 448 P. 2d 301 (Okla. 1968); In re Brown, 512 S.W. 2d 317 (Texas 1974). … Geiler v. Commission on Judicial Qualifications, supra.” In re Brown, 512 S.W. 2d 317, 320 (Tex. 1974). See In re Tally, 238 So. 2d 569, 571 (Fla. 1970).

Buchanan v. . Hedden

169 N.C. 222 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 24, 1915

Todd v. Outlaw, 79 N. C., 235 ; Duke v. Markham, 105 N. C., 138 ; Williams v. Griffin, 49 N. C., 31 ; Burnett v. Thompson, 48 N. C., 113 ; Lambert v. Lambert, 33 N. C., 162 ; Carrier v. Hampton, ibid., 307. … C., 119 ; Blair v. Brown, 116 N. C., 631 . No proof of their contents was made which is sufficient to cure the defects, if curable in that way.

Swink v. . Horn

226 N.C. 713 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1946

Copy of the written notice was sent the Bent Control Board, and also notice of the institution of this proceeding in court for summary ejectment. 2. … We note that neither the Price Administrator, nor the local Rent Control Board, though duly notified, has intervened here, or sought to restrain plaintiff’s action. Bowles v. Hall, 63 E. Supp., 826.

Brooks Equipment & Manufacturing Co. v. Taylor

230 N.C. 680 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1949

Jur., Sales, sections 94, 96, 98; Williston on Sales, sections 631 (a), 632, 634; Restatement, Sales, 471 (b) ; Brown v. Gray, 51 N.C. 103 , 76 Am. Dec. 563 ; Southern Iron & Equipment Co. v. Bamberg, E. & W. Ry.

State v. Williams

253 N.C. 804 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 20, 1961

Currin v. Wallace, 306 U.S. 1, 14 , 83 L. Ed. 441, 450 . … Brown v. New Jersey, 175 U.S. 172 , 44 *807 L. Ed. 119. Defendant has not shown that any of his rights were violated as guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment to the Federal Constitution, and we so hold.

Randolph v. . McGowans

174 N.C. 203 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 3, 1917

Brown, J. This is a civil action, instituted to recover possession of a cow. Plaintiff, at commencement of the action, took out the ancillary proceeding of claim and delivery. … Law, 536; Wells Eeplevin, sec. 455; 6 Bacon’s Abridgement, 67; George v. Hewlett, 35 Am. State Reports, 626; Suppinger v. Grauz, 137 Ill., 216 ; Hinkson v. Morrison, 47 Iowa, 167 ; Scott v.

Thomas v. Piedmont Realty & Development Co.

195 N.C. 591 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 9, 1928

Dorsey v. Corbett, 190 N. C., 783 ; Crowell v. Parker, 171 N. C., 392 . … Bryant v. Lumber Co., 192 N. C., 607 ; Perry v. Norton, 182 N. C., 585 ; Croom v. Lumber Co., 182 N. C., 217 ; Chatham v. Realty Co., 174 N. C., 671 . The judgment is affirmed. We find No error.

Murdock v. Chatham County

363 N.C. 806 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 28, 2010

Foster, and James Foster, Plaintiffs v. … Outz, The Chatham County Board of Adjustment and the Members Thereof in their Official Capacities: Carl E. Thompson, George Lucier, Patrick Barnes, Allen Michael Cross, and Tom Vanderbeck, Defendants v.

Jefferson v. . Jefferson

219 N.C. 333 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 26, 1941

In Jones v. Whichard , 163 N.C. 241 (246), 79 S.E. 503 , Justice Hoke , speaking for the Court, said: "In Triplett v. … Powell v. Powell , 168 N.C. 561 , 84 S.E. 860 ; Waller v. Brown , 197 N.C. 508 , 149 S.E. 687 ; Roe v. Journegan , 175 N.C. 261 , 95 S.E. 495 .

Lane v. . Phillips

51 N.C. 455 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1859

Had the plaintiff wilfully and without excuse left the defendant’s service, he would, undoubtedly, both according to the principles of the common law, and by force of our statute, have forfeited his wages; White v. … Brown, 2 Jones’ Rep. 443; Revised Code, ch. 80. Is it reasonable that he should be in *457 any better condition by acting so badly as to compel Ins employer to dismiss him ?

Harvey v. Pike

1 N.C. 82 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1817

The opinion of the Court, in Snell v. Rich, seems to be founded on the circumstance that the Master was not on board when the accident happened. In Berry v. … Moree v. Slue, Ventric 190, 238. 4 Dallas 206