Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

2.44s

  • State Ex Rel . Goodman v. . Goodman, Ex'r. .

    72 N.C. 508 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1875

    So in the State v. … In the subsequent case of Brown v. *511 Higden, 1 Atk. 291, before Lord Hardwicke, before the canse was heard, the defendant, administratrix, died and her husband took out letters de bonis non, upon which the plaintiff amended

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Cape Fear Railways, Inc. v. Cobb

    190 N.C. 375 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 28, 1925

    Comrs. v. Scales, 171 N. C., p. 527; Clements v. R. R., 179 N. C., 225 ; Capps v. R. R., 182 N. C., 758 . Plaintiff’s motion must be denied. … Sales Company were not sufficient, it clearly appears from the record that the appealing defendant is “doing business in this State,”, within its power of regulation (Browning v. Waycross, 233 U.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Clark v. Saco-Pettee MacHine Co.

    150 N.C. 372 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 1, 1909

    Brown, J. … Bank v. Peregoy, 147 N. C., 296 ; Bynum v. Powe, 97 N. C., 374 ; Godwin v. Monds, 101 N. C., 354 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Barwick v. . Barwick

    33 N.C. 80 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1850

    Aftérwards, the said Joshua sold the two slaves sued for to Wood, who, with the assistance of the other defendant, Brown, took them from the possession of the plaintiff, and sent them out of the State; whereupon this action … Hostler's administrators v. Scull, 2 Haywood 139, Taylor 152, Las peyre v. McFarland, N. C. T. R, 187, Andrews v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Peltz v. . Bailey

    157 N.C. 166 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 27, 1911

    BROWN, J., dissenting. *Page 134 The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by MR. CHIEF JUSTICE CLARK. This is an appeal from an order dismissing an appeal from a justice of the peace. … Jerman v. Gulledge , 129 N.C. 242 . In MacKenzie v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Young v. . Stewart.

    191 N.C. 297 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1926

    This definition was approved by Justice Brown in King v. Bynum, 137 N. C., 492 , and is cited with approval by Justice Brogdenin the recent case of S. v. Lassiter, ante, 210. … J., in Summerrow v. Baruch, 128 N.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Barbee v. Edwards

    238 N.C. 215 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 23, 1953

    Crook v. Warren, 212 N.C. 93 , 192 S.E. 684 ; Saleeby v. Brown, 190 N.C. 138 , 129 S.E. 424 ; Stevens v. Turlington, *219 186 N.C. 191 , 119 S.E. 210 ; Walker v. … Maddox v. Brown, 233 N.C. 519 , 64 S.E. 2d 864 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Disabarment of West

    212 N.C. 189 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 13, 1937

    Compare Board of Medical Examiners v. Gardner, 201 N. C., 123 , 159 S. E., 8 ; S. v. Carroll, 194 N. C., 37 , 138 S. E., 339 ; Mann v. Board of Optometry Examiners, 206 N. C., 853 , 175 S. E., 281 . … Diamond v. Service Stores, 211 N. C., 632 ; Lincoln v. R. R., 207 N. C., 787 , 178 S. E., 601 .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Morganton Manufacturing & Trading Co. v. Foy-Seawell Lumber Co.

    177 N.C. 404 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 7, 1919

    Lumber Co. v. Buhmann, supra; Gardiner v. May, supra, citing McLeod v. Gooch, supra. … Roulhac v. Brown, 87 N. C., 1 ; Pasour v. Lineberger, 90 N. C., 159 . This is true so long as tbe order is unreversed, but it is not material in tbe view taken by us of tbe case.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. . Futrell

    86 N.C. 122 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1882

    Nicholson v. Cox, 83 N. C., 44 . … Brown, 72 N. C., 393 , as its verity cannot be collaterally assailed.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Warren v. White

    251 N.C. 729 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 29, 1960

    In Brown v. Benton, 209 N.C. 285 , 183 S.E. 292 , the defendants, the main stockholders of a corporation, agreed orally to be personally responsible for merchandise shipped to the corporation. … Halliwell, 202 N.C. 846 , 163 S.E. 747 ; Brown v. Benton, supra; Farmers Federation, Inc., v. Morris, supra. Gennett v. Lyerly, 207 N.C. 201 , 176 S.E. 275 , discussed below, is cited as “recognizing rule.”

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Cooke

    246 N.C. 518 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 28, 1957

    S. v. Simpson, 12 N.C. 504 ; S. v. McCauless, 31 N.C. 375 ; S. v. Ray, 32 N.C. 39 ; S. v. Laney, 87 N.C. 535 ; S. v. Davenport, 156 N.C. 597 , 72 S.E. 7 . … .); Brown v. State, 85 S.E. 262 (Ga.); 87 C.J.S. 1113; 42 C.J.S. 1054; 27 Am. Jur. 649 .

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • State v. Williams

    253 N.C. 804 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 20, 1961

    Currin v. Wallace, 306 U.S. 1, 14 , 83 L. Ed. 441, 450 . … Brown v. New Jersey, 175 U.S. 172 , 44 *807 L. Ed. 119. Defendant has not shown that any of his rights were violated as guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment to the Federal Constitution, and we so hold.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Randolph v. . McGowans

    174 N.C. 203 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 3, 1917

    Brown, J. This is a civil action, instituted to recover possession of a cow. Plaintiff, at commencement of the action, took out the ancillary proceeding of claim and delivery. … Law, 536; Wells Eeplevin, sec. 455; 6 Bacon’s Abridgement, 67; George v. Hewlett, 35 Am. State Reports, 626; Suppinger v. Grauz, 137 Ill., 216 ; Hinkson v. Morrison, 47 Iowa, 167 ; Scott v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Murdock v. Chatham County

    363 N.C. 806 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 28, 2010

    Foster, and James Foster, Plaintiffs v. … Outz, The Chatham County Board of Adjustment and the Members Thereof in their Official Capacities: Carl E. Thompson, George Lucier, Patrick Barnes, Allen Michael Cross, and Tom Vanderbeck, Defendants v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lane v. . Phillips

    51 N.C. 455 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1859

    Had the plaintiff wilfully and without excuse left the defendant’s service, he would, undoubtedly, both according to the principles of the common law, and by force of our statute, have forfeited his wages; White v. … Brown, 2 Jones’ Rep. 443; Revised Code, ch. 80. Is it reasonable that he should be in *457 any better condition by acting so badly as to compel Ins employer to dismiss him ?

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bellows v. Asheville City Bd. of Educ.

    781 S.E.2d 482 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 28, 2016

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Stevenson

    196 N.C. 29 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 12, 1928

    Jourdan v. Green , 16 N.C. 271 ; Knight v. Knight , 56 N.C. 167 ; Vass v. Freeman, ibid. , 221; Britton v. Miller , 63 N.C. 268 ; Robinson v. McDiarmid , 87 N.C. 455 ; Wise v. Leonhardt , 128 N.C. 289 ; Jenkins v. … Mason v. White , 53 N.C. 421 ; Biddle v. Hoyt , 54 N.C. 160 ; Hawkins v. Everett , 58 N.C. 42 ; Chambers v. Payne , 59 N.C. 276 ; Lumber Co. v. Herrington , 183 N.C. 85 .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Crutchley v. Crutchley

    306 N.C. 518 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 3, 1982

    Patton v. … Williams v. Williams, 261 N.C. 48 , 134 S.E. 2d 227 (1964); Fuchs v. Fuchs, 260 N.C. 635 , 133 S.E. 2d 487 (1963); Kiger v. Kiger, 258 N.C. 126 , 128 S.E. 2d 235 .

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Wright v. . Insurance Co.

    138 N.C. 488 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 25, 1905

    Brown was agent of the defendant company in Greenville, N. … In Shelton v. Davis, 69 N.

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.