Case law

Arey v. Lemons

232 N.C. 531 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1950

Whitford v. Bank, 207 N.C. 229 , 176 S.E. 740 ; Kistler v. Weaver, 135 N.C. 388 , 47 S.E. 478 ; Wilson v. Respass, 86 N.C. 112 ; Hettrick v. Page, 82 N.C. 65 ; Baxter v. Baxter, 77 N.C. 118 ; Jordan v. … Plott v. Comrs., 187 N.C. 125 , 121 S.E. 190 ; Gray v. Warehouse Co., 181 N.C. 166 , 106 S.E. 657 ; Jones v. Lassiter, 169 N.C. 750 , 86 S.E. 710 ; Newton v. Brown, 134 N.C. 439 , 46 S.E. 994 .

Stephenson v. . Felton

106 N.C. 114 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1890

Brown v. Mitchell, 102 N. C., 371 . … In the case of Battle v. Mayo, 102 N.

Clark v. Saco-Pettee MacHine Co.

150 N.C. 372 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 1, 1909

Brown, J. … Bank v. Peregoy, 147 N. C., 296 ; Bynum v. Powe, 97 N. C., 374 ; Godwin v. Monds, 101 N. C., 354 .

State v. . Hedgecock

185 N.C. 714 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 18, 1923

In S. v. Brown, 170 N. … In S. v. Brown, 170 N. C., 715 , sustaining the constitutionality of the act which dispenses with the necessity of naming any person to whom the sale of liquor has been made (now C.

Dantzic v. State

279 N.C. 212 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 30, 1971

Brown, supra: “A writ of error coram nobis lies from any court of record returnable to itself, and not from a superior to an inferior court.” … Harper, 32 N.C. 392 (1849), and in Roughton v. Brown, supra. In civil cases, the writ of error became obsolete upon adoption in North Carolina of the Code of Civil Procedure.

State ex rel. Stanford v. Ellington

117 N.C. 158 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 15, 1895

Prior to the 13th day of March, 1895, the board of trustees of the State Library, under existing law elected to and filled this office. … On that day (March 13, 1895) the Legislature passed and ratified an Act repealing the law authorizing the board of trustees to elect, and provided for the election of this officer by the Legislature.

State ex rel. Pasquotank County v. American Surety Co.

201 N.C. 325 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 16, 1931

Marshall v. Kemp, 190 N. C., at p. 493; Gilmore v. Walker, 195 N. C., at p. 464; Indemnity Co. v. Corp. Com., 197 N. C., 562 .” S. v. Gant, supra, at p. 226. … Presson v. Boone, 108 N. C., 79 ; Marshall v. Kemp, 190 N. C., 491 . In Williams v. Hooks, 199 N.

Wagner v. Town of Conover

200 N.C. 82 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1930

In Donnell v. … Brown v. Chemical Co., 162 N. C., 83 .” The present action is against the municipality — -one brought to recover damage for injury done to the property.

Kennedy v. Kennedy

236 N.C. 419 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1952

Whitley v. Arenson, 219 N.C. 121 , 12 S.E. 2d 906 ; Artis v. Artis, supra. … Citing Blackwell v. Blackwell, 124 N.C. 269 , 32 S.E. 676 ; Wilkins v. Norman, 139 N.C. 40 , 51 S.E. 797 ; Bryant v. Shields, supra; McNeill v. Blevins, 222 N.C. 170 , 22 S.E. 2d 268 .

State v. . Miller

224 N.C. 228 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 12, 1944

Another method was approved in Hare v. Board of Education, 113 N. C., 9 , 18 S. … Medlin v. Board of Education , 167 N. C., 239 , 83 S. E., 483 ; S. v. Patrick, supra; and S. v. Chavers, supra.

Murphy v. . Murphy

202 N.C. 394 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1932

He signaled the car and it stopped and he boarded it. … Quantz v. R. R. , 137 N.C. 136 , 49 S.E. 79 ; Jones v. R. R. , 199 N.C. 1 , 153 S.E. 637 ; Gibbs v. R. R. , 200 N.C. 49 , *Page 397 156 S.E. 138 . Directly in point is the declaration of law in Willis v. R.

Bryant v. . Shields

220 N.C. 628 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 7, 1942

Jones v. Whichard , 163 N.C. 241 , 79 S.E. 503 ; Brown v. Brown , 168 N.C. 4 , 84 S.E. 25 ; Williams v. Williams , 175 N.C. 160 , 95 S.E. 157 ; Johnson v. Lee , 187 N.C. 753 , 122 S.E. 839 ; Lee v. … J., 742; Gay v. Stancell , 76 N.C. 369 ; Bruton v. Light Co. , 217 N.C. 1 , 6 S.E.2d 822 ; Jefferson v. Sales Corp., ante , 76; Harshaw v. Harshaw, ante , 145; Current v. Webb, ante , 425.

Park View Hospital Ass'n v. People's Bank & Trust Co.

211 N.C. 244 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 24, 1937

This principle was properly applied in Baker v. Dawson, supra. The decision in that case was manifestly correct. … It was therefore not only convenient but reasonably necessary for the plaintiff to furnish board for said nurses.

Baker v. Murphrey

254 N.C. 506 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1961

Brown, as Deputy Clerk, the principle is well settled in this State that there is a prima facie presumption that a deputy clerk, authorized by statute to take acknowledgments, is duly appointed and qualified, nothing else … Piland v. Taylor, 113 N.C. 1 , 18 S.E. 70 . 1 Am. Jur. 333 , Sec. 50 See also G.S. 52-12 and G.S. 47-1. Applying this principle to the case in hand, the challenge to the conclusions of law are without merit.

Finch v. Ward

238 N.C. 290 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 30, 1953

Adams v. Service Co., 237 N.C. 136 , 74 S.E. 2d 332 ; Howard v. Carman, 235 N.C. 289 , 69 S.E. 2d 522 ; Smith v. Kappas, 219 N.C. 850 , 15 S.E. 2d 375 ; Mack v. … Marshall Field & Co., 218 N.C. 697 , 12 S.E. 2d 235 ; Spencer v. Brown, 214 N.C. 114 , 198 S.E. 630 .

Devereux v. . McMahon

108 N.C. 134 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1891

P., § 807; Pierce v. Hakes, 23 Pa. State, 231; Insurance Co. v. Brown, 30 N. J. Eq., 193; Browne on Stat. of Frauds, 12; Kime v. Brooks, 9 Ired., 218 ; Frost v. Deering, 21 Me., 156; Gardner v. Gardner, 6 Cush., 483 . … Tatom v. White, 95 N. C., 453 ; State v. Byrd, supra; Sellers v. Sellers, supra; Martindale, § 6.

Liberty Manufacturing Co. v. Malloy

217 N.C. 666 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 8, 1940

Saleeby v. Brown, 190 N. C., 138 , 129 S. E., 424 ; Bogert v. Striker, 42 N. E. (N. Y.), 528; Flye v. Berry, 63 N. E. (Mass.), 1071; Hibernia Nat'n. Bank v. Succession of Gragard, 30 So. (La.), 728; 19 R. C. … Walker v. Mebane, supra; Ballard v. Williams, 95 N. C., 126 .

Fulps v. . Mock

108 N.C. 601 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1891

Lewis v. Railroad, 95 N. C., 179 . … Stokes v. Taylor, 104 N. C., 394 ; Pom. Civ. Rem., 549; The Code, § 261; Moore v. Edmiston, 70 N. C., 510 . No error.

State Ex Rel . Goodman v. . Goodman, Ex'r. .

72 N.C. 508 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1875

So in the State v. … In the subsequent case of Brown v. *511 Higden, 1 Atk. 291, before Lord Hardwicke, before the canse was heard, the defendant, administratrix, died and her husband took out letters de bonis non, upon which the plaintiff amended

In Re Homer Durant Truitt Ex Rel. Truitt

269 N.C. 249 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 20, 1967

A levy of a license or privilege tax on dogs has been held valid in many decisions of this Court: Mowery v. Salisbury, 82 N.C. 175 ; Newell v. Green, 169 N.C. 462 , 86 S.E. 291 ; Board of Commissioners v. … Morris v. Gentry, 89 N.C. 248 . Of course, the Board of Commis *253 sioners may pay the claim into court where it will be paid only on a showing of right to receive it.