Case law

Dantzic v. State

279 N.C. 212 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 30, 1971

Brown, supra: “A writ of error coram nobis lies from any court of record returnable to itself, and not from a superior to an inferior court.” … Harper, 32 N.C. 392 (1849), and in Roughton v. Brown, supra. In civil cases, the writ of error became obsolete upon adoption in North Carolina of the Code of Civil Procedure.

State v. . Wilson

227 N.C. 43 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 11, 1946

S., 18-11; S. v. Foster, 185 N. C., 674 , 116 S. E., 561 ; S. v. Hammond, 188 N. C., 602 , 125 S. E., 402 ; S. v. Dowell, supra; S. v. Epps, supra. … Brown, 225 N. C., 22 , S. v. Grimes, 226 N. C., 523 , or he may put the defendant on trial under a bill of indictment, charging the same offense, returned in the case. S. v. Razook, 179 N. C., 708 , 103 S.

State ex rel. Stanford v. Ellington

117 N.C. 158 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 15, 1895

Prior to the 13th day of March, 1895, the board of trustees of the State Library, under existing law elected to and filled this office. … On that day (March 13, 1895) the Legislature passed and ratified an Act repealing the law authorizing the board of trustees to elect, and provided for the election of this officer by the Legislature.

Wagner v. Town of Conover

200 N.C. 82 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1930

In Donnell v. … Brown v. Chemical Co., 162 N. C., 83 .” The present action is against the municipality — -one brought to recover damage for injury done to the property.

State v. . Hedgecock

185 N.C. 714 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 18, 1923

In S. v. Brown, 170 N. … In S. v. Brown, 170 N. C., 715 , sustaining the constitutionality of the act which dispenses with the necessity of naming any person to whom the sale of liquor has been made (now C.

Asheville Land Co. v. Lang

146 N.C. 311 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 11, 1907

In Harry v. Graham, 18 N. C., 77 , Ruffin, C. … Justice Brown, who also points out that “there is nothing in. Norwood v. Crawford, 114 N. C., 518 , which militates against the position that this is a proper method of determining the beginning corner.”

Bryant v. . Shields

220 N.C. 628 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 7, 1942

Jones v. Whichard , 163 N.C. 241 , 79 S.E. 503 ; Brown v. Brown , 168 N.C. 4 , 84 S.E. 25 ; Williams v. Williams , 175 N.C. 160 , 95 S.E. 157 ; Johnson v. Lee , 187 N.C. 753 , 122 S.E. 839 ; Lee v. … J., 742; Gay v. Stancell , 76 N.C. 369 ; Bruton v. Light Co. , 217 N.C. 1 , 6 S.E.2d 822 ; Jefferson v. Sales Corp., ante , 76; Harshaw v. Harshaw, ante , 145; Current v. Webb, ante , 425.

Baker v. Murphrey

254 N.C. 506 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1961

Brown, as Deputy Clerk, the principle is well settled in this State that there is a prima facie presumption that a deputy clerk, authorized by statute to take acknowledgments, is duly appointed and qualified, nothing else … Piland v. Taylor, 113 N.C. 1 , 18 S.E. 70 . 1 Am. Jur. 333 , Sec. 50 See also G.S. 52-12 and G.S. 47-1. Applying this principle to the case in hand, the challenge to the conclusions of law are without merit.

Finch v. Ward

238 N.C. 290 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 30, 1953

Adams v. Service Co., 237 N.C. 136 , 74 S.E. 2d 332 ; Howard v. Carman, 235 N.C. 289 , 69 S.E. 2d 522 ; Smith v. Kappas, 219 N.C. 850 , 15 S.E. 2d 375 ; Mack v. … Marshall Field & Co., 218 N.C. 697 , 12 S.E. 2d 235 ; Spencer v. Brown, 214 N.C. 114 , 198 S.E. 630 .

State Ex Rel . Goodman v. . Goodman, Ex'r. .

72 N.C. 508 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1875

So in the State v. … In the subsequent case of Brown v. *511 Higden, 1 Atk. 291, before Lord Hardwicke, before the canse was heard, the defendant, administratrix, died and her husband took out letters de bonis non, upon which the plaintiff amended

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Town of Sanford

193 N.C. 340 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1927

R. v. Sanford, supra. … McAden v. Watkins, 191 N. C., p. 105.

Devereux v. . McMahon

108 N.C. 134 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1891

P., § 807; Pierce v. Hakes, 23 Pa. State, 231; Insurance Co. v. Brown, 30 N. J. Eq., 193; Browne on Stat. of Frauds, 12; Kime v. Brooks, 9 Ired., 218 ; Frost v. Deering, 21 Me., 156; Gardner v. Gardner, 6 Cush., 483 . … Tatom v. White, 95 N. C., 453 ; State v. Byrd, supra; Sellers v. Sellers, supra; Martindale, § 6.

State ex rel. Pasquotank County v. American Surety Co.

201 N.C. 325 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 16, 1931

Marshall v. Kemp, 190 N. C., at p. 493; Gilmore v. Walker, 195 N. C., at p. 464; Indemnity Co. v. Corp. Com., 197 N. C., 562 .” S. v. Gant, supra, at p. 226. … Presson v. Boone, 108 N. C., 79 ; Marshall v. Kemp, 190 N. C., 491 . In Williams v. Hooks, 199 N.

Peltz v. . Bailey

157 N.C. 166 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 27, 1911

BROWN, J., dissenting. *Page 134 The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by MR. CHIEF JUSTICE CLARK. This is an appeal from an order dismissing an appeal from a justice of the peace. … Jerman v. Gulledge , 129 N.C. 242 . In MacKenzie v.

Spaugh v. . Hartman

150 N.C. 454 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 14, 1909

Brown, J. … Archer v. Haithcock, 51 N. C., 421 ; Jones v. Riddick, 79 N. C., 291 ; Weaver v. Cryer, 12 N.

Park View Hospital Ass'n v. People's Bank & Trust Co.

211 N.C. 244 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 24, 1937

This principle was properly applied in Baker v. Dawson, supra. The decision in that case was manifestly correct. … It was therefore not only convenient but reasonably necessary for the plaintiff to furnish board for said nurses.

Lee v. . Beaman

101 N.C. 294 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1888

Johnston v. Jones, 87 N. C., 393 ; Mauney v. Holmes, Ibid, 428. … Speer v. James, 94 N. C., 417 ; Smith v. Brown, 99 N. C., 377 . The cases of Syme v. Badger, 96 N. C., 197 . and Andres v. Powell, 97 N.

Kerr v. Girdwood.

138 N.C. 473 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 23, 1905

Brown, J. Mrs. Laura A .GirdwOod died during 1904, leaving a last will and testament executed by her as a holograph will and dated December 26, 1903. … Underhill on Wills, sec. 37-43; Schouler, sec. 262, 263; Alston v. Davis, 118 N. C., 202 .

State v. . Adams

213 N.C. 243 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 23, 1938

Downing v. White, 211 N. C., 40 , 188 S. E., 815 ; King v. R. R., 184 N. C., 442 , 115 S. E., 172 ; Starnes v. Thompson, 173 N. C., 466 , 92 S. E., 259 ; Wood v. Sugg, 91 N. C., 93 ; Harvey v. Tyler, 69 U. … S., 328 ; *246 Dean v. Brown, 261 Ky., 593 , 88 S. W. (2d), 298 ; Horn v. Metzger, 234 Ill., 240 , 84 N. E., 893 ; 15 R. C. L., 884; 34 C. J., 537. There is nothing on the present record to overturn this presumption.

Liberty Manufacturing Co. v. Malloy

217 N.C. 666 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 8, 1940

Saleeby v. Brown, 190 N. C., 138 , 129 S. E., 424 ; Bogert v. Striker, 42 N. E. (N. Y.), 528; Flye v. Berry, 63 N. E. (Mass.), 1071; Hibernia Nat'n. Bank v. Succession of Gragard, 30 So. (La.), 728; 19 R. C. … Walker v. Mebane, supra; Ballard v. Williams, 95 N. C., 126 .