Case law

Allen v. Wilmington & Weldon Railroad

119 N.C. 710 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1896

Under these circumstances and this advice plaintiff boarded this train as it passed Rocky Mount. … Railroad v. Nixum, 19 Am. Repts., 703 ; 2 Fiel’s Lawyers’ Briefs, 59, 60 ; 34 Atlantic Reports, 880. This seems to dispose of the case as presented by the record and arguments.

State v. Jenkins

240 N.C. 601 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 1954

The facts in this case are substantially on all fours with the facts in S. v. … While the subsequent arrest of the defendant does not, ipso facto, discharge the original forfeiture, Tar Heel Bond Co. v. Krider, 218 N.C. 361 . 11 S.E. 2d 291 ; S. v.

Neal v. . Nelson

117 N.C. 394 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1895

In Brown v. Brown , 106 N.C. 459 , Justice Davis , delivering the opinion of the Court and referring to the authorities cited in Avent v. … Beard v. Ryan , 73 Ala. 37 ; Catlin v. Deller , 38 Conn. 26 ; Stowher v. Griffin , 20 Ga. 312 ; Paxson v. Bailey , 17 Ga. 600 ; Brown v. King , 5 Metcalf, 173.

State v. . Levy

200 N.C. 586 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 8, 1931

These cases were followed by S. v. Barnes, 52 N. … S. v. Fellows, 3 N. C., 340 . The testimony of Zanie was competent.

State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Nantahala Power & Light Co.

326 N.C. 190 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 7, 1990

E.g., United States v. Florida East Coast Railway Company, 410 U.S. 224 , 35 L. Ed. 2d 223 (1973); Bi-Metallic Investment Company v. State Board of Equalization, 239 U.S. 441 , 60 L. … Iowa Electric Light & Power v. Utilities Board, 442 N.W.2d 99, 100 (Iowa 1989).

Harbour Point Homeowners'association, Inc. v. Djf Enterprises, Inc.

364 N.C. 239 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 16, 2010

698 S.E.2d 397 (2010) HARBOUR POINT HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC., by and through its Board of Directors, individually and in its representative capacity on behalf of its members, Plaintiff, v.

Johnson v. Sanders

260 N.C. 291 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 9, 1963

Miller v. Lash, 85 N.C. 51 . The expressions of Mr. Ralph are parallel to those made by the decedent with reference to the plaintiff’s services in Brown v. Williams, 196 N.C. 247 , 145 S.E. 233 . … Cline v. Cline, 258 N.C. 295 , 128 S.E. 2d 401 ; Grady v. Faison, 224 N.C. 567 , 31 S.E. 2d 760 ; Coley v.

Blalock v. Clark.

137 N.C. 140 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 6, 1904

Simpson v. Pegram, 112 N. C., 541 ; Brown v. Atkinson, 91 N. C., 396 ; Norris v. Fowler, 87 N. C., 9; Bank v. Williams, 79 N. C., 129 ; Moore v. Eason, 33 N. C., 568 . … C., 308 , citing Smith v. Loan Assn., 119 N. C., 257 , and Grandy v. Small, 50 N.

Asheville Land Co. v. Lang

146 N.C. 311 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 11, 1907

In Harry v. Graham, 18 N. C., 77 , Ruffin, C. … Justice Brown, who also points out that “there is nothing in. Norwood v. Crawford, 114 N. C., 518 , which militates against the position that this is a proper method of determining the beginning corner.”

Tanning Co. v. . Telegraph Co.

143 N.C. 376 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1906

Brown, J. There is no dispute as to the material facts. The evidence shows that on 7 November, 1903, an agent of the Standard Oil Company at Wilmington, N. C., wrote to the plaintiff, at Andrews, N. … In Moulton v.

Williams v. . Glenn

92 N.C. 253 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1885

To the same effect is Barry v. Ransom, 2 Kernan, 462, Lapham v. Barnes, 2 Vt., 213 ; Keith v. Goodwin, 31 Vt., 268 . … Wyatt, 23 Maine, 156; Oldham v. Brown, 28 Ohio, 41. We might cite other authorities but we consider these sufficient to fortify the proposition contended for by the plaintiff.

Arey v. Lemons

232 N.C. 531 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1950

Whitford v. Bank, 207 N.C. 229 , 176 S.E. 740 ; Kistler v. Weaver, 135 N.C. 388 , 47 S.E. 478 ; Wilson v. Respass, 86 N.C. 112 ; Hettrick v. Page, 82 N.C. 65 ; Baxter v. Baxter, 77 N.C. 118 ; Jordan v. … Plott v. Comrs., 187 N.C. 125 , 121 S.E. 190 ; Gray v. Warehouse Co., 181 N.C. 166 , 106 S.E. 657 ; Jones v. Lassiter, 169 N.C. 750 , 86 S.E. 710 ; Newton v. Brown, 134 N.C. 439 , 46 S.E. 994 .

Walker v. . Flemming

70 N.C. 482 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1874

Pending an action in the Superior Court, the purpose of which was to have it decided, whether the "Tate board" or the "Howerton board" were entitled to the office, Tate, who held the office as President de facto , assumes … Sloan v. McDowell , 71 N.C. 359 .

Town of Hertford v. Harris

263 N.C. 776 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 24, 1965

Schloss v. Jamison, 258 N.C. 271 , 128 S.E. 2d 590 ; Goldsboro v. R. R., 246 N.C. 101 , 97 S.E. 2d 486 . … Brown J. said in Durham v. Rigsbee, 141 N.C. 128 , 53 S.E. 531 : “It is not essential that the particular language of the statute should be used.

State v. . Hedgecock

185 N.C. 714 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 18, 1923

In S. v. Brown, 170 N. … In S. v. Brown, 170 N. C., 715 , sustaining the constitutionality of the act which dispenses with the necessity of naming any person to whom the sale of liquor has been made (now C.

American Blower Co. v. MacKenzie

197 N.C. 152 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 1929

Jackson v. Edwards, 7 Paige 386, 408 ; Brown v. Brown, 94 S. C., 492; Strayer v. Long, 86 Va., 557, 563 ; Gordon v. Tweedy, 74 Ala., 232 , 49 A. R., 813. … Co. v. Dudley, 12 A. L. R., 1358; Bailey v. Bailey, 172 N. C., 671 .

State v. . Outlaw

72 N.C. 598 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1875

This case is distinguishable from State v. Jenhin-s, 5 Jones, 430 . … Upon this statement the counsel of the prisoner made a very ingenious and forcible argument to bring the case within the principle of Brown's case, where the fact of a servant having slept in a barn the night it was broken

State ex rel. Pasquotank County v. American Surety Co.

201 N.C. 325 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 16, 1931

Marshall v. Kemp, 190 N. C., at p. 493; Gilmore v. Walker, 195 N. C., at p. 464; Indemnity Co. v. Corp. Com., 197 N. C., 562 .” S. v. Gant, supra, at p. 226. … Presson v. Boone, 108 N. C., 79 ; Marshall v. Kemp, 190 N. C., 491 . In Williams v. Hooks, 199 N.

Dail v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

176 N.C. 111 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 25, 1918

Hunt v. R. R., 170 N. C., 444 ; Brown v. R. R., 171 N. C., 270 . … Burton v. Mfg. Co., 132 N. C., 17 . This seems to have been tbe real question in tbe case. Tbe court submitted tbe question of proximate cause to tbe jury. Spittle v. R. R., 175 N. C., 500 .

Kennedy v. Kennedy

236 N.C. 419 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1952

Whitley v. Arenson, 219 N.C. 121 , 12 S.E. 2d 906 ; Artis v. Artis, supra. … Citing Blackwell v. Blackwell, 124 N.C. 269 , 32 S.E. 676 ; Wilkins v. Norman, 139 N.C. 40 , 51 S.E. 797 ; Bryant v. Shields, supra; McNeill v. Blevins, 222 N.C. 170 , 22 S.E. 2d 268 .