Case law

Gatlin v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

179 N.C. 433 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 14, 1920

The case is governed in this respect by Neal v. Hardware Co., 122 N. C., 104 ; Herring v. Armwood, 130 N. C., 177 ; Lumber Co. v. R. R., 151 N. C., 23 ; Pendergraph v. Express Co., 178 N. C., 344 . … Brown, J., dissenting.

Geiger v. . Caldwell

184 N.C. 387 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 15, 1922

Sprinkle v. Sprinkle, 159 N. C., 81 ; Millsaps v. Estes, 137 N. C., 536 ; Dist. of Columbia v. Bailey, 171 U. S., 176 . … Millinery Co. v. Ins. Co., 160 N. C., 130 ; Watson on Arbitration, marg. p. 176; Stevens v. Brown, 82 N. C., 460 . In Cutler v. Cutler, 169 N.

State v. McAllister

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 25, 2020

Brown, when you [sic] going to stand up and take responsibility, Mr. Brown? Mr. Brown wasn’t a tool. He was the engine. He was the engine that made everything possible. … Naturally understood, defense counsel’s statements during closing argument urged not-guilty verdicts across the board.

State Ex Rel. Associated Cosmetologists of North Carolina, Inc. v. Ritchie

206 N.C. 808 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 11, 1934

This idea was expressed in Hines v. … See, also, Saunders v. Gatling , 81 N.C. 298 ; Ellison v. Raleigh , 89 N.C. 125 ; Foard v. Hall , 111 N.C. 369 , 16 S.E. 420 .

Lewis Ex Rel. Smith v. Fagan

13 N.C. 298 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1830

(Williams v. Hicks, 1 Murp. 437. Washington v. Hunt, ante vol. 1, 475.) … (Brown v. Clary, 1 Hay. 107. Davis v. Wilkinson, 1 Hay. 334 .)

Thomas v. Raleigh & Augusta Air-Line Railroad

129 N.C. 392 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1901

Purnell v. Railroad, 122 N. C., 832 ; Cox v. Railroad, 123 N. C., 604 ; Printing Co. v. Raleigh, 126 N. C., 516 ; Moore v. Railway Co., 128 N. C., 455 . … Brown, also a section foreman and witness for the defendant, says that “with the number of men around it (the car), I did not consider it a dangerous place.”

Peeler v. . Peeler

202 N.C. 123 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 27, 1932

C., 711; Brown v. Brown, 195 N. C., 315 ; Ellington v. Trust Co., 196 N. C., 755 ; Myers v. Barnhardt, ante, 49. Unfortunately, the plaintiff, Cora May Peeler, and the defendant, B. M. … Archbell v. Archbell, 158 N. C., 408 . In Taylor v. Taylor, 197 N.

Hill v. Lexington Council No. 21 Jr. O. U. A. M.

202 N.C. 697 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 11, 1932

The defendant relies upon Page v. Junior Order, 153 N. C., 404 , 69 S. E., 414 . … Perry v. Ins. Co., 132 N. C., 283 , 43 S. E., 837 ; Foscue v. Ins. Co., supra. Affirmed.

Learning center/ogden School, Inc. v. Cherokee County Bd. of Educ.

365 N.C. 547 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 26, 2012

721 S.E.2d 228 (2012) LEARNING CENTER/OGDEN SCHOOL, INC. v. CHEROKEE COUNTY BD. OF EDUC. No. 493P11-1. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 26, 2012. Christopher Z. Campbell, for Cherokee County Board of Education.

State v. McLaughlin

330 N.C. 66 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 3, 1991

State v. Sanderson, 327 N.C. 397 , 394 S.E.2d 803 (1990). The State concedes that there was some evidence to support a finding that the defendant had a good reputation in the community. … State v. Brown, 327 N.C. 1 , 394 S.E.2d 434 (1990). *71 The State also argues that there was no evidence to support a finding of the “catch all” mitigating circumstance of any other circumstance of mitigating value.

Motsinger v. Perryman

218 N.C. 15 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 19, 1940

Hood v. Simpson, 206 N. C., 748 , 175 S. E., 193 , and cases cited; Headen v. Ins. Co., 206 N. C., 270 , 176 S. E., *20 568 ; Abernethy v. Ins. Co., 213 N. C., 23 , 195 S. E., 30 ; Bank v. Bryson City, 213 N. … Such board may not adopt a rule under such delegated authority which has the effect of substantive law.

Virginia-Carolina Laundry Supply Corp. v. Scott

267 N.C. 145 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 4, 1966

In Hancock v. … Hobbs v. Cashwell, 152 N.C. 183 , 67 S.E. 495 ; Brown v. Mitchell, 102 N.C. 347 , 9 S.E. 702 ; McCanless v. Flinchum, 89 N.C. 373 ; Warren v. Makely, 85 N.C. 12 .

Frazier v. . Cherokee Indians

146 N.C. 477 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1907

In McAden v. … *Page 352 BROWN, J., dissenting. (484)

State v. Robertson

121 N.C. 551 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1897

In State v. Jones, 67 N. … In State v. Browning, 78 N.

Bailey v. . Bishop

152 N.C. 383 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 20, 1910

Thus, it was held in Brown v. … And in Nutter v.

Matthews v. . Lawrence

212 N.C. 537 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1937

Tbis is an action instituted by those persons constituting the Board of Photographic Examiners of the State of North Carolina, created by ch. 155, Public Laws 1935, and by A. A. E. … Motor Service v. R. R., 210 N. C., 36 , and cases there cited.

State v. . Outlaw

72 N.C. 598 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1875

This case is distinguishable from State v. Jenhin-s, 5 Jones, 430 . … Upon this statement the counsel of the prisoner made a very ingenious and forcible argument to bring the case within the principle of Brown's case, where the fact of a servant having slept in a barn the night it was broken

State v. Woody

277 N.C. 646 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 20, 1971

Relying upon State v. … State v. Bruce, 268 N.C. 174, 182 , 150 S.E. 2d 216 ; State v. Lowry and State v. Mallory, 263 N.C. 536, 541 , 139 S.E. 2d 870 .

Allen v. Wilmington & Weldon Railroad

119 N.C. 710 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1896

Under these circumstances and this advice plaintiff boarded this train as it passed Rocky Mount. … Railroad v. Nixum, 19 Am. Repts., 703 ; 2 Fiel’s Lawyers’ Briefs, 59, 60 ; 34 Atlantic Reports, 880. This seems to dispose of the case as presented by the record and arguments.

State v. Hundley

272 N.C. 491 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 12, 1968

Patterson, 222 N.C. 179 , 22 S.E. 2d 267 , S. v. Brown, 225 N.C. 22 , S. v. Grimes, 226 N.C. 523 , or he may put the defendant on trial under a bill of indictment, charging the same offense, returned in the case. S. v. … Razook, 179 N.C. 708 , 103 S.E. 67 ; S. v. Thornton, 136 N.C. 610 ; S. v. Crook, 91 N.C. 536 ; S. v. Quick, 72 N.C. 241 . The appeal vests jurisdiction in the court.” In State v.