Case law

Moore v. . Jones

76 N.C. 189 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1877

Inasmuch as the plaintiffs were advised to include Crews and the other persons, who held the certificate of election made by the “ Board of Commissioners” in the summons, and to ask for a restraining order and injunction, … they have no ground to complain of the order requiring them to give bond, which His Honor, after he found that the proceeding would be protracted for some time, thought v it to be his duty to make. ■ No error. • Per Curiam

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Town of Sanford

193 N.C. 340 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1927

R. v. Sanford, supra. … McAden v. Watkins, 191 N. C., p. 105.

Schloss v. Schloss

273 N.C. 266 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1968

from his wife and fail to provide her * * * with the necessary subsistence according to his means and condition in life * * * or if he be guilty of any * * * acts that would be * * * cause for divorce * * * from bed and board … Miller v. Miller, 270 N.C. 140 , 153 S.E. 2d 854 ; Sayland v. Sayland, supra; Griffith v. Griffith, 265 N.C. 521 , 144 S.E. 2d 589 ; Harris v. Harris, 258 N.C. 121 , 128 S.E. 2d 123 ; Mercer v.

In Re Will of Mueller

170 N.C. 28 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1915

Wright v. Howe, 52 N. C., 412 ; In re Abee, 146 N. C., 214 . As said in In re Everett’s Will, 153 N. … Grove v. Spiker, 72 Md., 300 .” 18 A. and E. Anno. Cases, 412.

Johnson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

177 N.C. 31 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 3, 1919

Young v. Telegraph Co., 168 N. C., 36 ; Garland v. R. R., 172 N. C., 638 , and in Brown v. R. R., 174 N. … C., 694 , in which tbe plaintiff was injured by tbe weather, or otherwise, in walking from tbe station to destination because of tbe delay in transportation; and Chancey v. R. R., 174 N.

Kernodle v. . Kernodle

174 N.C. 441 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 31, 1917

BROWN, J., dissenting. This is an action on the following bond: $1,866. One day after date, we jointly promise to pay L. L. Kernodle $1,866 for value received. This 3 October, 1907. (Signed) J. D. KERNODLE. … In Kernodle v. Williams , 153 N.C. 475 , the plaintiff was the same as in this case, and the defendants were a daughter (442) and her husband, while in the present action they are a son and his wife.

Lewis v. Beaufort County

249 N.C. 628 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1959

J.), in Waldrop v. … In Worley v.

Craver v. Franklin Cotton Mills, Inc.

196 N.C. 330 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1928

Marks v. Cotton Mills, 135 N. C., 290; Nail v. Brown, 150 N. C., 535 ; Mercer v. R. r., 154 N. C., 401 ; Gaither v. Clement, 183 N. C., 450 . … Harton v. Telephone Co., 141 N. C., 455 ; Lineberry v. R. R., 187 N. C., 786 ; Cobia v. R. R., 188 N. C., 490 .

Arrington v. Continental Life Insurance

193 N.C. 344 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1927

In Clifton v. Insurance Co., 168 N. C., 499 , Brown, J., says-: “It is elemental law that the payment of the premium is requisite to keep the policy of insurance in force. … Coile v. Commercial Travelers, 161 N. C., 104 ; Ins. Co. v. Eggleston, 26 U. S., 577 ; Ins. Co. v. Norton, 96 U. S., 234 . Defendant’s assignments of error cannot be sustained.

Hodges v. . Smith

159 N.C. 525 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 11, 1912

Brown, J. This case was before this Court on a former appeal, and is reported in the 158 N. C., page 256. … The case of Allen v. Truesdale, 135 Mass., 75 , cited in the former opinion of this Court, is almost on all-fours with the present case, and fully warrants the judgment of the court upon the issues as found by the jury.

Moore v. . Miller

179 N.C. 396 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 31, 1920

Blair v. Miller, 13 N. C., 407 ; Christenbury v. King, supra; Isler v. Dewey, 84 N. C., 345 . *398 “4. … Honeycutt v. Brooks, 116 N. C., 788 ; Brown v. Morisey, 128 N. C., 139 ; Worth v. Simmons, 121 N. C., 357 .

Gatlin v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

179 N.C. 433 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 14, 1920

The case is governed in this respect by Neal v. Hardware Co., 122 N. C., 104 ; Herring v. Armwood, 130 N. C., 177 ; Lumber Co. v. R. R., 151 N. C., 23 ; Pendergraph v. Express Co., 178 N. C., 344 . … Brown, J., dissenting.

Geiger v. . Caldwell

184 N.C. 387 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 15, 1922

Sprinkle v. Sprinkle, 159 N. C., 81 ; Millsaps v. Estes, 137 N. C., 536 ; Dist. of Columbia v. Bailey, 171 U. S., 176 . … Millinery Co. v. Ins. Co., 160 N. C., 130 ; Watson on Arbitration, marg. p. 176; Stevens v. Brown, 82 N. C., 460 . In Cutler v. Cutler, 169 N.

State v. McAllister

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 25, 2020

Brown, when you [sic] going to stand up and take responsibility, Mr. Brown? Mr. Brown wasn’t a tool. He was the engine. He was the engine that made everything possible. … Naturally understood, defense counsel’s statements during closing argument urged not-guilty verdicts across the board.

State v. McLaughlin

330 N.C. 66 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 3, 1991

State v. Sanderson, 327 N.C. 397 , 394 S.E.2d 803 (1990). The State concedes that there was some evidence to support a finding that the defendant had a good reputation in the community. … State v. Brown, 327 N.C. 1 , 394 S.E.2d 434 (1990). *71 The State also argues that there was no evidence to support a finding of the “catch all” mitigating circumstance of any other circumstance of mitigating value.

Virginia-Carolina Laundry Supply Corp. v. Scott

267 N.C. 145 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 4, 1966

In Hancock v. … Hobbs v. Cashwell, 152 N.C. 183 , 67 S.E. 495 ; Brown v. Mitchell, 102 N.C. 347 , 9 S.E. 702 ; McCanless v. Flinchum, 89 N.C. 373 ; Warren v. Makely, 85 N.C. 12 .

Isley v. . Bridge Co.

141 N.C. 220 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 24, 1906

Brown, J. Tbe uncontradicted evidence shows that tbe plaintiff was injured while working in tbe defendant’s mills assisting tbe foreman in moving a heavy piece of iron, weighing about twelve hundred pounds. … Lyles v. Carbonating Co., 140 N. C., 25 . This was not done in this case and, therefore, the plaintiff’s exception is of no avail. 2.

Matthews v. . Lawrence

212 N.C. 537 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1937

Tbis is an action instituted by those persons constituting the Board of Photographic Examiners of the State of North Carolina, created by ch. 155, Public Laws 1935, and by A. A. E. … Motor Service v. R. R., 210 N. C., 36 , and cases there cited.

State v. Woody

277 N.C. 646 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 20, 1971

Relying upon State v. … State v. Bruce, 268 N.C. 174, 182 , 150 S.E. 2d 216 ; State v. Lowry and State v. Mallory, 263 N.C. 536, 541 , 139 S.E. 2d 870 .

Allen v. Wilmington & Weldon Railroad

119 N.C. 710 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1896

Under these circumstances and this advice plaintiff boarded this train as it passed Rocky Mount. … Railroad v. Nixum, 19 Am. Repts., 703 ; 2 Fiel’s Lawyers’ Briefs, 59, 60 ; 34 Atlantic Reports, 880. This seems to dispose of the case as presented by the record and arguments.