Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.86s
248 N.C. 403 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 21, 1958
Butner v. Spease, 217 N. C. 82, 88 , 6 S.E. 2d 808 , which cites Scott v. Shepherd, 2 Bl. 892 (Squib case). … J., in Ingle v. Cassady, 208 N.C. 497 , 181 S.E. 562 ; Simmons v. Rogers, 247 N.C. 340, 348 , 100 S.E. 2d 849 , and cases cited; 38 Am. Jur., Negligence Sec. 41; 65 C.J.S., Negligence Sec. 17.
Cited 11 timesPublishedUpchurch v. Harp Builders, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 22, 2024
Ennis, Baynard, Morton, Medlin & Brown, PLLC, by Maynard M. Brown, for plaintiff-appellee. Crossley, McIntosh, Collier, Hanley & Edes, PLLC, by Brian J. … In Burcl v.
Cited 0 timesPublished149 N.C. 551 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 22, 1908
State v. Davis, 134 N. C., 633 ; State v. Tyson, 633 N. C., 692 ; State v. Brown, 100 N. C., 519 . We do not see, upon an examination of the evidence, that the fact alleged to -have been admitted was contested. … See also State v. Vines, 93 N. C., 493 ; State v. Capps, 134 N. C., 630, 631 .
Cited 27 timesPublished22 N.C. 274 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1839
Cloud v. Martin, 1 Dev. and Bat. 397. Upon a re-perusal of it, we all think as we then did, as to the extent of the benefit intended for the grand-son.. … The expenses of such clothing and his board, at school, during a reasonable period for the acquisition of the specified degree of knowledge, we think, is charged on the testator’s estate.
Cited 0 timesPublished179 N.C. 14 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1919
Lawrence v. Hardy, 151 N. C., 123 ; Vick v. Flourney, 147 N. C., 209 ; Bernhardt v. Brown, 118 N. C., 701 . In Vick v. … And, in Lawrence v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBuilding and Loan Association v. . Swaim
198 N.C. 14 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 27, 1929
Substantially the same conclusion was reached in Gilbert v. Brown, 97 S. W. (Ky.), 40, 7 L. R. A. (N. S.), 1053, and in Maul v. Vaughn, 45 Ala., 134 . … See Felton v. Reid, 52 N. C., 269 ; Long v. Rankin, 108 N. C., 333 ; Wilcox v. Arnold, 116 N. C., 709 . The principles underlying these decisions must control in the case before us.
Cited 8 timesPublished133 N.C. 528 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1903
Ely v. Early, 94 N. C., I. … See also Mastin v. Marlow, 65 N. C., 703 ; Tucker v. Markland, 101 N. C., 427 ; Foster v. Hackett, 112 N. C., 556 ; Wright v. Brown, 116 N. C., 28 ; Brown v. Dail, 117 N. C., 41 .
Cited 22 timesPublishedState ex rel. Utilities Commission v. North Carolina Power
338 N.C. 412 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 9, 1994
Utilities Comm’n v. … All three serve on the VEPCO Board of Directors, as well as the Dominion Resources, Inc. Board of Directors. The Chairman of the VEPCO Board is also the Chairman of the Dominion Resources, Inc.
Cited 6 timesPublished154 N.C. 174 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 1910
S. v. Freeman, 114 N. C., 872 ; Haynes v. Coward, 116 N. C., 840 ; Brown v. House, 119 N. C., 622 ; Shober v. Wheeler, ib., 471; Guano Co. v. Hicks, 120 N. C., 29 ; Burrell v. Hughes, 120 N. C., 277 ; Norwood v. … C., 745 ; Worth v. Wilmington, 131 N. C., 532 ; S. v. Telfair, 139 N. C., 555 ; Slocumb v. Construction Co., 142 N. C., 350 ; Pittman v. Kimberly, 92 N. C., 562 , and numerous other cases. In Burrell v. Hughes, 120 N.
Cited 1 timesPublished240 N.C. 601 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 1954
The facts in this case are substantially on all fours with the facts in S. v. … While the subsequent arrest of the defendant does not, ipso facto, discharge the original forfeiture, Tar Heel Bond Co. v. Krider, 218 N.C. 361 . 11 S.E. 2d 291 ; S. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished70 N.C. 482 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1874
Pending an action in the Superior Court, the purpose of which was to have it decided, whether the "Tate board" or the "Howerton board" were entitled to the office, Tate, who held the office as President de facto , assumes … Sloan v. McDowell , 71 N.C. 359 .
Cited 0 timesPublished238 N.C. 42 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 12, 1953
Solomon v. Koontz, 189 N.C. 837 , 127 S.E. 516 ; Jordan v. Motor Lines, 182 N.C. 559 , 109 S.E. 566 ; Brown v. Railroad, 147 N.C. 136 , 60 S.E. 898 ; 25 C.J.S., Damages, section 147. Dr. … Brown v. Lipe, 210 N.C. 199 , 185 S.E. 681 ; Poe v. Railroad, 141 N.C. 525 , 54 S.E. 406 .
Cited 1 timesPublished289 N.C. 268 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 29, 1976
State v. Rankin, 284 N.C. 219, 223 , 200 S.E. 2d 182, 185 (1973). Accord, State v. Sanders, supra; State v. Felton, 283 N.C. 368 , 196 S.E. 2d 239 (1973); State v. … After an unknown man brought a brown bag with a Winn Dixie sign on it to the Grier house, an identical bag containing dynamite was opened and examined by the defendant.
Cited 2 timesPublished95 N.C. 113 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1886
any such vessel, by reason or by means of any fire happening to, or on board the vessel, unless such fire is caused by the design or negligence of such owner.” … Co. v. Hill Man. Co., 109 U. S., 578 , are declared not to be “inland” waters in the sense of the statute.
Cited 0 timesPublished157 N.C. 507 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1911
BROWN, J. … Atherton v. Atherton, 181 U. S., 155 ; Haddock v. Had dock, 201 U. S., 563 .
Cited 55 timesPublished199 N.C. 678 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1930
Block v. Dowd, 120 N. C., 402 ; Tedder v. R. R., supra; 17 R. C. L., at p. 606. In Auto Co. v. Rudd, 176 N. … Brown v. Sheets, 197 N. C., at p. 273, 63 A. L. R., p. 1357. In fact, the defendants tendered no issue that Hoffman was a purchaser for value and without notice of the fraud.
Cited 7 timesPublished158 N.C. 341 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 13, 1912
In Fisher v. … Brown v. Cogdell, 136 N. C., 32 , and cases there cited. Reversed.
Cited 6 timesPublishedBayer v. Raleigh & Augusta Air Line Railroad
125 N.C. 17 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 10, 1899
In Walton v. Pearson, 82 N. … C., 7 ; Griffin v. Nelson, 100 N. C., 235 ; Churchill v. Insurance Co., 92 N. C., 485 , as authority sustaining this contention. Dunn v. Underwood, Stanback v. Harris and Griffin v.
Cited 2 timesPublished202 N.C. 579 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 13, 1932
Trust Co. v. Leggett , 191 N.C. 362 , 131 S.E. 752 ; S. v. Collins , 151 N.C. 648 , 65 S.E. 617 . … While unnecessary, perhaps it may not be amiss to add that our present position in no way conflicts with the decisions in Jones v. Oil Co., ante , 328, 162 S.E. 741 , S. v. Brown , 159 N.C. 467 , 74 S.E. 580 , S. v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedCabarrus Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Dep't of State Treasurer, Ret. Sys. Div.
824 S.E.2d 403 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 27, 2019
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna