Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

3.86s

  • Cockman v. Powers

    248 N.C. 403 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 21, 1958

    Butner v. Spease, 217 N. C. 82, 88 , 6 S.E. 2d 808 , which cites Scott v. Shepherd, 2 Bl. 892 (Squib case). … J., in Ingle v. Cassady, 208 N.C. 497 , 181 S.E. 562 ; Simmons v. Rogers, 247 N.C. 340, 348 , 100 S.E. 2d 849 , and cases cited; 38 Am. Jur., Negligence Sec. 41; 65 C.J.S., Negligence Sec. 17.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Upchurch v. Harp Builders, Inc.

    Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 22, 2024

    Ennis, Baynard, Morton, Medlin & Brown, PLLC, by Maynard M. Brown, for plaintiff-appellee. Crossley, McIntosh, Collier, Hanley & Edes, PLLC, by Brian J. … In Burcl v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. . Lance

    149 N.C. 551 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 22, 1908

    State v. Davis, 134 N. C., 633 ; State v. Tyson, 633 N. C., 692 ; State v. Brown, 100 N. C., 519 . We do not see, upon an examination of the evidence, that the fact alleged to -have been admitted was contested. … See also State v. Vines, 93 N. C., 493 ; State v. Capps, 134 N. C., 630, 631 .

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Cloud v. Martin

    22 N.C. 274 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1839

    Cloud v. Martin, 1 Dev. and Bat. 397. Upon a re-perusal of it, we all think as we then did, as to the extent of the benefit intended for the grand-son.. … The expenses of such clothing and his board, at school, during a reasonable period for the acquisition of the specified degree of knowledge, we think, is charged on the testator’s estate.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bynum v. . Bynum

    179 N.C. 14 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1919

    Lawrence v. Hardy, 151 N. C., 123 ; Vick v. Flourney, 147 N. C., 209 ; Bernhardt v. Brown, 118 N. C., 701 . In Vick v. … And, in Lawrence v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Building and Loan Association v. . Swaim

    198 N.C. 14 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 27, 1929

    Substantially the same conclusion was reached in Gilbert v. Brown, 97 S. W. (Ky.), 40, 7 L. R. A. (N. S.), 1053, and in Maul v. Vaughn, 45 Ala., 134 . … See Felton v. Reid, 52 N. C., 269 ; Long v. Rankin, 108 N. C., 333 ; Wilcox v. Arnold, 116 N. C., 709 . The principles underlying these decisions must control in the case before us.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Boles v. Caudle.

    133 N.C. 528 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1903

    Ely v. Early, 94 N. C., I. … See also Mastin v. Marlow, 65 N. C., 703 ; Tucker v. Markland, 101 N. C., 427 ; Foster v. Hackett, 112 N. C., 556 ; Wright v. Brown, 116 N. C., 28 ; Brown v. Dail, 117 N. C., 41 .

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. North Carolina Power

    338 N.C. 412 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 9, 1994

    Utilities Comm’n v. … All three serve on the VEPCO Board of Directors, as well as the Dominion Resources, Inc. Board of Directors. The Chairman of the VEPCO Board is also the Chairman of the Dominion Resources, Inc.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Walsh v. . Burleson

    154 N.C. 174 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 1910

    S. v. Freeman, 114 N. C., 872 ; Haynes v. Coward, 116 N. C., 840 ; Brown v. House, 119 N. C., 622 ; Shober v. Wheeler, ib., 471; Guano Co. v. Hicks, 120 N. C., 29 ; Burrell v. Hughes, 120 N. C., 277 ; Norwood v. … C., 745 ; Worth v. Wilmington, 131 N. C., 532 ; S. v. Telfair, 139 N. C., 555 ; Slocumb v. Construction Co., 142 N. C., 350 ; Pittman v. Kimberly, 92 N. C., 562 , and numerous other cases. In Burrell v. Hughes, 120 N.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Jenkins

    240 N.C. 601 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 1954

    The facts in this case are substantially on all fours with the facts in S. v. … While the subsequent arrest of the defendant does not, ipso facto, discharge the original forfeiture, Tar Heel Bond Co. v. Krider, 218 N.C. 361 . 11 S.E. 2d 291 ; S. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Walker v. . Flemming

    70 N.C. 482 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1874

    Pending an action in the Superior Court, the purpose of which was to have it decided, whether the "Tate board" or the "Howerton board" were entitled to the office, Tate, who held the office as President de facto , assumes … Sloan v. McDowell , 71 N.C. 359 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hunt ex rel. Hunt v. Wooten

    238 N.C. 42 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 12, 1953

    Solomon v. Koontz, 189 N.C. 837 , 127 S.E. 516 ; Jordan v. Motor Lines, 182 N.C. 559 , 109 S.E. 566 ; Brown v. Railroad, 147 N.C. 136 , 60 S.E. 898 ; 25 C.J.S., Damages, section 147. Dr. … Brown v. Lipe, 210 N.C. 199 , 185 S.E. 681 ; Poe v. Railroad, 141 N.C. 525 , 54 S.E. 406 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Sellers

    289 N.C. 268 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 29, 1976

    State v. Rankin, 284 N.C. 219, 223 , 200 S.E. 2d 182, 185 (1973). Accord, State v. Sanders, supra; State v. Felton, 283 N.C. 368 , 196 S.E. 2d 239 (1973); State v. … After an unknown man brought a brown bag with a Winn Dixie sign on it to the Grier house, an identical bag containing dynamite was opened and examined by the defendant.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Woodhouse v. . Cain

    95 N.C. 113 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1886

    any such vessel, by reason or by means of any fire happening to, or on board the vessel, unless such fire is caused by the design or negligence of such owner.” … Co. v. Hill Man. Co., 109 U. S., 578 , are declared not to be “inland” waters in the sense of the statute.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Alderman

    157 N.C. 507 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1911

    BROWN, J. … Atherton v. Atherton, 181 U. S., 155 ; Haddock v. Had dock, 201 U. S., 563 .

    Cited 55 timesPublished
  • Reich v. . Triplett

    199 N.C. 678 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1930

    Block v. Dowd, 120 N. C., 402 ; Tedder v. R. R., supra; 17 R. C. L., at p. 606. In Auto Co. v. Rudd, 176 N. … Brown v. Sheets, 197 N. C., at p. 273, 63 A. L. R., p. 1357. In fact, the defendants tendered no issue that Hoffman was a purchaser for value and without notice of the fraud.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Dixon v. . Haar

    158 N.C. 341 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 13, 1912

    In Fisher v. … Brown v. Cogdell, 136 N. C., 32 , and cases there cited. Reversed.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Bayer v. Raleigh & Augusta Air Line Railroad

    125 N.C. 17 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 10, 1899

    In Walton v. Pearson, 82 N. … C., 7 ; Griffin v. Nelson, 100 N. C., 235 ; Churchill v. Insurance Co., 92 N. C., 485 , as authority sustaining this contention. Dunn v. Underwood, Stanback v. Harris and Griffin v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hendrix v. . R. R.

    202 N.C. 579 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 13, 1932

    Trust Co. v. Leggett , 191 N.C. 362 , 131 S.E. 752 ; S. v. Collins , 151 N.C. 648 , 65 S.E. 617 . … While unnecessary, perhaps it may not be amiss to add that our present position in no way conflicts with the decisions in Jones v. Oil Co., ante , 328, 162 S.E. 741 , S. v. Brown , 159 N.C. 467 , 74 S.E. 580 , S. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Cabarrus Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Dep't of State Treasurer, Ret. Sys. Div.

    824 S.E.2d 403 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 27, 2019

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.