Case law

Brown v. . Williams

83 N.C. 684 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1880

Neither was the undertaking given in time, nor the appeal prosecuted as required by the rules of this court, as determined in Sever v. McLaughlin, 82 N. C., 342 , and Smith v. Lyon, Ibid., 2. Per Curiam.

Nesbit v. . Brown

16 N.C. 30 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1826

Cited: Robinson v. Lewis , 45 N.C. 61 ; Redmond v. Staton , 116 N.C. 143 . *Page 28 (35)

Brown v. . Brady

4 N.C. 13 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1812

In the case of Henry v.

Brown v. Texas Co.

237 N.C. 738 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1953

Hayes v. Elon College, 224 N.C. 11 , 29 S.E. 2d 137 ; Bass v. Wholesale Corp., 212 N.C. 252 , 193 S.E. 1 ; Beach v. McLean, 219 N.C. 521 , 14 S.E. 2d 515 ; McCraw v. Mills, Inc., 233 N.C. 524 , 64 S.E. 2d 658 ; Wood v. … Atkins v. Transportation Co., 224 N.C. 688 , 32 S.E. 2d 209 ; Ingram v. Smoky Mountain Stages, Inc., 225 N.C. 444 , 35 S.E. 2d 337 ; Caulder v. Gresham, 224 N.C. 402 , 30 S.E. 2d 312 ; Samuels v.

Board of Education v. Board of Commissioners

111 N.C. 578 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 15, 1892

.: The questions presented for our consideration are precisely the same as those which are determined in the case of Barksdale v. Commissioners, 93 N. … Article IX., section 3 of the Constitution of North Carolina, to keep the public schools open for at least four months every year, yet, in discharging this duty, they cannot disregard the limitations imposed by Article V.

Board of Education v. Board of Commissioners

192 N.C. 274 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 13, 1926

The resolution of the board of education of 1 March, contained, among other things, this clause: “and upon approval of this resolution by the board of county commissioners, his Honor, Henry A. … Bank v. Mitchell, 191 N. C., 193 ; McBachern v. Kerchner, 90 N. C., 177 ; Vaughan v. Gooch, 92 N. C., 524 ; Westhall v. Hoyle, 141 N. C., 337 ; Chemical Co. v. Bass, 175 N. C., 426 ; Morris v. Patterson, 180 N.

Board of Education v. . Board of Commissioners

178 N.C. 305 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 22, 1919

C., 412 ; Loughran v. Hickory, 129 N. C., 281 ; Burton v. Furman, 115 N. C., 166 ; Board of Education v. Comrs, 150 N. C., 116 , and Edgerton v. Kirby, 156 N. … Justice Bynum stated the rule with clearness in Brown v. Turner, 70 N.

State v. Brown

280 N.C. 723 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 7, 1972

186 S.E.2d 925 (1972) 280 N.C. 723 STATE of North Carolina v. Albert Gerald BROWN et al. Supreme Court of North Carolina. March 7, 1972. Robert Morgan, Atty. Gen., Henry T. Rosser, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State. … Grubb, for defendant Brown. Jerry B. Grimes, for defendant Maddox. Walser, Brinkley, Walser & McGirt, for defendant Phillips.

Brown v. . Coal Co.

208 N.C. 50 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1935

Lumber Co. v. Finance Co. , 204 N.C. 285 , 168 S.E. 219 , and cases cited in the opinion in that case. … Timber Co. v. Insurance Co. , 192 N.C. 115 , 133 S.E. 424 . See Lunceford v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Association , 190 N.C. 314 , 129 S.E. 805 . The judgment is Affirmed.

State v. Brown

339 N.C. 616 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 9, 1995

454 S.E.2d 259 (1995) 339 N.C. 616 STATE of North Carolina v. Norma Jean BROWN. No. 597A94. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 9, 1995. John G. Barnwell, William B. Crumpler, Asst. Attys. Gen., James E. … Robert Brown, Jr., Public Defender, Ms. Sherri L. Royall, Asst. Public Defender, for Brown. Prior report: 117 N.C.App. 239 , 450 S.E.2d 538 .

Brown v. Carson's Executors

45 N.C. 272 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1853

Sowell v. Barrett, ante 50. … Kelly v. Bryan, 6 Ire. Eq. Rep. 283. Thebill must be dismissed with costs. Per Cuiixam. Bill dismissed accordingly.

State v. Brown

339 N.C. 606 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 10, 1995

453 S.E.2d 165 (1995) 339 N.C. 606 STATE of North Carolina v. Leon BROWN. No. 528A93. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 10, 1995. Michael F. Easley, Atty. Gen. by William N. Farrell, Jr., Sr. Deputy Atty.

Board of Education v. Board of Commissioners

182 N.C. 571 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 7, 1921

The exact question here presented was before the Court in the case of Board of Education v. Board of Commissioners, 174 N. … sufficiently to provide a six-months term for one or more schools in every district in Yadkin County, unless and until the defendant board of commissioners shall levy a tax in accordance with plaintiff’s demand.

Gregory v. WA BROWN & SONS

719 S.E.2d 26 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 16, 2011

719 S.E.2d 26 (2011) Andrea GREGORY, Employee v. W.A. BROWN & SONS, Employer, PMA Insurance Co., Carrier. No. 447A08-2. Supreme Court of North Carolina. November 16, 2011. M. Duane Jones, Charlotte, for W.A. … Brown & Sons, et al. William D. Acton, Jr., for Gregory, Andrea.

State v. Brown

284 N.C. 617 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1974

202 S.E.2d 274 (1974) 284 N.C. 617 STATE of North Carolina v. Harry S. BROWN. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 5, 1974. Ernest C. Richardson, III, for the defendant. Robert Morgan, Atty. Gen., Rafford E.

Brown v. . R. R.

161 N.C. 575 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 26, 1913

Deppe v. R. R. , 152 N.C. 79 ; Cotton v. R. R. , 149 N.C. 229 . … As said in Dale v.

Dishner Developers, Inc. v. Brown

354 N.C. 569 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 2001

Brown v. . Chemical Co.

162 N.C. 84 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 23, 1913

Kimel v. Kimel , 49 N.C. 121 ; Giles v. Stevens , 79 Mass. 146 ; Talbot v. Whipple , 73 Mass. 122 . … Cited: Donnell v. Greensboro , 164 N.C. 335 ; Brown v. Chemical Co. , 165 N.C. 423 ; Rhodes v. Durham, ib. , 680.

Brown & Co. v. Nimocks

126 N.C. 808 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1900

The numerous decided cases will he found in Clark’s Code, under sec. 548— notably Hines v. Hines, 84 N. C., 122 ; Clement v. Foster, 99 N. C., 255 , and Welch v. Kinsland, 93 N. C., 281 . Appeal dismissed.

Brown v. Alsop & Pierce

152 N.C. 114 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 9, 1910

Brown, J. "We find no error committed in the trial below, and as the controversy is one almost entirely of fact, we deem it unnecessary to discuss the several assignments of error in detail. … contract between the city of New Bern and Alsop & Pierce the basis of his action, and said contract requiring that “all material * * * must meet requirements placed upon it by the engineer,” these requirements became parts of Brown