Case law

Johnston v. . Smith

86 N.C. 498 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1882

Washburn v. Picot, 3 Dev., 390 ; Hobbs v. Riddick, 5 Jones, 80. … Johnson v. Titus, 2 Hill Rep., 606 ; Parley v. Batch, 23 Pick., 283 ; Hart v. Wright, 17 Wend., 209 ; Barnum v. Barnum, 8 Conn., 469; Brown v. Ray, 10 Ired., 72 ; Weatherly v. Miller, 2 Jones, 166 ; Findly v.

Powers v. City of Asheville

203 N.C. 2 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1932

S. v. Wickersham, 201 U. … E., 146 ; Umstead v. Board of Elections, 192 N. C., 139 , 134 S. E., 409 ; Person v. Doughton, 186 N. C., 723 , 120 S. E., 481 . Affirmed.

Hough v. . Horne

20 N.C. 369 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1838

Cited: Wynne v. Alexander , 29 N.C. 238 ; Dula v. McGhee , 34 N.C. 333 ; Brown v. House , 118 N.C. 879 ; Higdon v. Rice , 119 N.C. 626 . *Page 297 (373)

Zachary v. . R. R.

156 N.C. 496 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 9, 1911

He was on the way to his boarding house for a purpose entirely personal to himself and not on the carrier's business. … Wolf v. R. R. , 154 N.C. (503) 571; Sherrill v. R. R. , 140 N.C. 255 ; Weiss v. Bethlehem Iron Co. , 88 Fed., 23 ; R. R., v. Jackson , 78 Ark. 100 ; R. R. v. Peterson , 156 Ind. 364 ; Shoner v.

Henderson County v. Osteen

297 N.C. 113 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 20, 1979

Alexander, 282 N.C. 402 , 192 S.E. 2d 811 (1972) (tax valuation by State Board of Assessment); Henderson County v. … Davis v. State, 1 Ariz. App. 264 , 401 P. 2d 749 (1965) (tax sale); Canyon Crest Villas South v. Board of County Commissioners of Arapahoe County, 36 Col.

State v. . Cooke

176 N.C. 731 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 6, 1918

In S. v. … "The statutes does not specify how much or in what way she shall be supported, but simply that she shall be supported" ( Brown, J., in S. v.

Boutten v. Wellington & Powellsville Railroad

128 N.C. 337 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 28, 1901

Barbee v. Barbee, 108 N. C., 581 ; S. C., 109 N. C., 299 ; Smith v. Arthur, 110 N. C., 400 ; Shaw v. Williams, 100 N. C., 272 . In this last case (at page 281) Smith, C. … Nor is this case like Dellinger v. Gillespie, 118 N.

Phillips v. Trezevant

70 N.C. 176 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1874

This principle is illustrated by Brown v. Long, 2 D. & B.

State v. . Howard

92 N.C. 772 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1885

State v. Matthews, 66 N. C., 106 . … In State v. Houston, 76 N.

State v. Albarty

238 N.C. 130 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 12, 1953

S. v. Cole, 202 N.C. 592 , 163 S.E. 594 ; S. v. Carlson, 171 N.C. 818 , 89 S.E. 30 ; *132 S. v. Green, 151 N.C. 729 , 66 S.E. 564 ; S. v. Lunsford, 150 N.C. 862 , 64 S.E. 765 ; S. v. Hill, 79 N.C. 656 . … Supp. 57 ; Isom v. State, 71 Ga. App. 803 , 32 S.E. 2d 437 ; Powell v. State, 196 Miss. 331 , 17 So. 2d 524 ; State v. Jefferson, 19 N. J. Misc. 678, 23 A. 2d 406 ; Brown v. State, 139 Tex. Cr.

Finley v. . Finley

201 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1931

Tayloe v. Bond, 45 N. C., 5 ; Alsbrook v. Reid, 89 N. C., 151 ; Cozart v. Lyon, 91 N. C., 282 ; Reid v. Alexander, 170 N. C., 303 ; Herring v. Herring, 180 N. C., 165 .” In Heptinstall v. Newsom,, 146 N. C., 504 , 60 S. … Brown, J., writing the opinion for the Court, says: “We cannot recognize the'regularity of this proceeding nor the jurisdiction of the court to entertain it.

Worley v. . Worley

214 N.C. 311 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 19, 1938

Capehart v. Dettrick, 91 N. C., 344 ; Kitchin v. Grandy, 101 N. C., 86 , 7 S. E., 663 ; Gore v. Davis, 124 N. C., 234 , 32 S. E., 554 ; Sanderlin v. Gross, 172 N. C., 234 , 90 S. E., 213 ; Miller v. Marriner, 187 N. … Brown v. Jennings, 188 N. C., 155 , 124 S. E., 150 . The ruling of the court below will be upheld.

Starnes v. . Tyson

226 N.C. 395 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 22, 1946

Jenkins v. Castelloe, 208 N. C., 406 , 181 S. E., 266 . From a procedural standpoint, the case apparently parallels Brown v. Lipe, 210 N. C., 199 , 185 S. E., 681 ; Trust Co. v. Greyhound Lines, 210 N. C., 293 , 186 S. … Trust Co. v. Greyhound Lines, supra; Williams v. Charles Stores Co., supra; Leiterman v. Miller, 209 N. C., 709 , 184 S. E., 525 .

Bowen v. Iowa National Mutual Insurance Company

270 N.C. 486 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 20, 1967

McNamara v. Chapman, 81 N.H. 169 , 123 A. 229 , 31 A.L.R. 188 . See also Brown v. Louisburg, 126 N.C. 701 , 36 S.E. 166 . … In Brown v. Louisburg, supra, the facts were these: A property owner in the town of Louisburg caused an excavation in the sidewalk in front of his building into which the plaintiff fell and was injured.

Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Whiting Manufacturing Co.

209 N.C. 560 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 26, 1936

Liverman v. R. R. , 109 N. C., 52 ; Beal v. R. R., 136 N. C., 298 ; C. S., 1730. In the case at bar no rights had been acquired. … In re Baker, supra, is cited in Board of Education v. Forrest, 193 N. C., 519 . The statute, C.

Simpson v. NORTH CAROLINA LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEM

323 N.C. 362 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1988

Moore, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. … NORTH CAROLINA LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, a corporation; Board of Trustees of the North Carolina Local Government Employees' Retirement System, a body politic and corporate; E.T.

Town of Weaverville v. Hobbs

212 N.C. 684 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 6, 1938

The facts upon which the decision of this Court in Board of Financial Control v. Henderson County, 208 N. C., 569 , 181 S. E., 636 , and Benson v. Johnston County, 209 N. C., 751 , 185 S. … R., 783, where the case of Board of Financial Control v. Henderson County, supra, is reported, will be found annotations collecting authorities from other jurisdictions on this subject.

Wilson Lumber & Milling Co. v. Hutton & Bourbonnais Co.

159 N.C. 445 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 28, 1912

Brown v. House, 116 N. C., 866; Cox v. Cox, 91 N. C., 356 .” ’ The Court further said, quoting from Mayo v. Blount, 23 N. … In Brown v. House, 116 N.

Cardwell v. Norfolk & Western Railway

171 N.C. 365 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1916

Hocutt v. R. R., 124 N. C., 214 ; Rice v. R. R., 130 N. C., 377 ; Davis v. Smith, 141 N. C., 108 , and cases cited to above in Anno. Ed.; Brown v. R. R., 165 N. C., 396 ; and there are many others in our Reports. … Waters v. Kear, 168 N. C., 246 ; Barcliff v. R. R., supra.

Lammonds v. Aleo Manufacturing Company

243 N.C. 749 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 11, 1956

Trust Co. v. Processing Co., 242 N.C. 370, 371 , 88 S.E. 2d 233 ; Canestrino v. Powell, 231 N.C. 190 , 56 S.E. 2d 566 , and cases cited. … See Thomasville Chair Co. v. United Furniture Workers of America, 233 N.C. 46 , 62 S.E. 2d 535 ; Skinner v. Gaither Corp., 234 N.C. 385 , 67 S.E. 2d 267 ; Brown v. Moore, 229 N.C. 406 , 50 S.E. 2d 5 .