Case law

Francis v. . Herren

101 N.C. 497 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1888

Boyd v. Turpin , 94 N.C. 137 ; Brem v. Lockhart , 93 N.C. 191 . … Cited: Stancill v. Spain , 133 N.C. 80 ; Trust Co. v. Sterchie , 169 N.C. 24 ; Realty Co. v. Carter , 170 N.C. 7 , 266 .

State v. Allen

346 N.C. 731 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 24, 1997

The General Assembly is authorized and empowered to create a Board of Paroles, provide for the appointment of the members thereof, and enact suitable laws defining the duties and authority of such Board to grant, revoke and … . § 14-34.1 (1995); State v. Bray, 321 N.C. 663, 670 , 365 S.E.2d 571, 575 (1988); State v. Mancuso, 321 N.C. 464, 468 , 364 S.E.2d 359, 362 (1988).

Sutton v. Bessent

133 N.C. 559 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1903

In this spirit I wrote, for a unanimous Court, the opinions in the cases of Brown v. Nimocks, 124 N. C., 417 , and Hall v. Cottingham, Ibid., 402, by which I must abide.

Mauney v. . Luzier's, Inc.

212 N.C. 634 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1937

Co. v. Am. Tob. Co., 246 U. S., 79 ; Int. Harvester Co. v. Ky., 234 U. S., 579 ; Riverside Cotton Mills v. Menefee, 237 U. S., 189 ; Tignor v. Balfour, 167 Va., 58 , 187 S. E., 468 . … Hilton v. Northwestern Expanded Metal Co., 16 F. (2), 821. In Brown v. Coal Co., 208 N. C., 50 , 178 S.

Cardwell v. Norfolk & Western Railway

171 N.C. 365 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1916

Hocutt v. R. R., 124 N. C., 214 ; Rice v. R. R., 130 N. C., 377 ; Davis v. Smith, 141 N. C., 108 , and cases cited to above in Anno. Ed.; Brown v. R. R., 165 N. C., 396 ; and there are many others in our Reports. … Waters v. Kear, 168 N. C., 246 ; Barcliff v. R. R., supra.

Anthony v. . Jeffress

172 N.C. 378 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 9, 1916

Pender v. Speight , 159 N.C. 616 ; Townsend v. Williams , 117 N.C. 330 ; Soloman v. Bates , 118 N.C. 315 . … by him to the board.

Bynum v. . Bynum

179 N.C. 14 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1919

Lawrence v. Hardy, 151 N. C., 123 ; Vick v. Flourney, 147 N. C., 209 ; Bernhardt v. Brown, 118 N. C., 701 . In Vick v. … And, in Lawrence v.

State v. Isley

164 N.C. 491 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 19, 1913

Tbe decision óf tbis appeal is controlled by S. v. Griffin, 154 N. … C., 611 , in wbicb tbe statute under Vbicb tbe defendant is indicted was fully discussed in an elaborate and learned opinion by Associate Justice Brown, and upon tbe authority of that case tbe judgment is reversed, with directions

Building and Loan Association v. . Swaim

198 N.C. 14 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 27, 1929

Substantially the same conclusion was reached in Gilbert v. Brown, 97 S. W. (Ky.), 40, 7 L. R. A. (N. S.), 1053, and in Maul v. Vaughn, 45 Ala., 134 . … See Felton v. Reid, 52 N. C., 269 ; Long v. Rankin, 108 N. C., 333 ; Wilcox v. Arnold, 116 N. C., 709 . The principles underlying these decisions must control in the case before us.

Gordon v. . Pendleton

202 N.C. 241 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 17, 1932

Ham v. Norwood, 196 N. C., 762 ; Corporation Commission v. Bank, 193 N. C., 113 ; Besseliew v. Brown, 177 N. C., 65 .

State v. . Smith

100 N.C. 466 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1888

The opinion of the Court seems to have been controlled by the ruling in the case of the State v. … In.State v.

Reese v. Piedmont, Inc.

240 N.C. 391 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 4, 1954

Fanelty v. Rogers Jewelers, Inc., supra; Drumwright v. North Carolina Theatres, Inc., 228 N.C. 325 , 45 S.E.2d 379 . We said in Benton v. … Umfleet testified Jones worked for the Board of Directors of the hospital, and so far as he knew the Board of Directors for the hospital was the same as the Board of Directors for the whole building, but he might be wrong

Alexander v. Richmond Cedar Works

177 N.C. 536 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 9, 1919

Turner v. Davis, 132 N. C., 187 ; S. v. Starnes, 97 N. C., 423 ; Brown v. Mitchell, 102 N. C., 347 ; S. v. DeGraff, 113 N. C., 688 ; Schehan v. Malone, 72 N. C., 59 ; Mottu v. Davis, 153 N. C., 160 ; Aden v. … See Wheeler v. Cole, 164 N. C., 378 ; Padgett v. McCoy, 167 N. C., 508 ; Gainey v. Godwin, 171 N. C., 754 ; Steeley v. Lumber Co., 165 N. C., 35 .

Acme Manufacturing Co. v. McCormick

175 N.C. 277 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 3, 1918

Woodson v. Beck, *279 151 N. C., 145 ; Walker v. Cooper, 150 N. C., 129 ; Walker v. Venters, 148 N. C., 388 ; Mudge v. Varner, 146 N. C., 147 ; Bank v. Moore, 138 N. C., 529 .” And in Bank v. Moore, 138 N. … This rule, excluding evidence of a parol agreement, has no application to an agreement made after the execution of the writing, changing, or modifying the written agreement (Brown v. Mitchell, 168 N.

Simpson v. NORTH CAROLINA LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEM

323 N.C. 362 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1988

Moore, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. … NORTH CAROLINA LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, a corporation; Board of Trustees of the North Carolina Local Government Employees' Retirement System, a body politic and corporate; E.T.

Groome v. . Davis

215 N.C. 510 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 3, 1939

E., 539 ; Anthony v. Knight, 211 N. C., 637 , 191 S. E., 323 ; McCulley v. Anderson (Neb.), 227 N. W., 321 ; Richard v. Neault, 126 Maine, 17, 135 Atl., 524, 525 ; Brown v. Saunders, 44 Ga. App., 114 , 160 S. … Wooten v. Smith, ante, 48; Cunningham v. Haynes, 214 N. C., 456 , and cited cases; Anthony v. Knight, supra; Hinnant v. R. R., supra; Sebastian v. Motor Lines, supra; Brown v. R. R., 208 N. C., 57 , 179 S.

Sessions v. . Columbus County

214 N.C. 634 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 4, 1939

Hallyburton v. Board of Education, 213 N. C., 9 , 195 S. E., 21 . Tbe defendant alleges, and tbe plaintiff admits, that tbe requirements of Art. Y, sec. 4, of tbe Constitution have been met in tbe instant case. … Hallyburton v. Board of Education, supra. It is provided by Art.

State v. Trull

169 N.C. 363 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 5, 1915

When there is merely matter of suspicion it is purely in the discretion of tbe presiding judge, citing Moore v. Edmiston, 70 N. C., 481 ; S. v. Brittain, supra; Baker v. Brown, 151 N. C., 17 , and S. v. Tilghman, supra. … In Baker v. Brown this proposition is fully discussed and sustained by Walker, J. In S. v. Harper, 101 N.

Herring v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

168 N.C. 555 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1915

BROWN, J., dissenting; WALKER, J., concurring in dissenting opinion. … R. v. Behrens , 233 U.S. 473 , and other cases cited in Ingle v. R. R. , 167 N.C. 636 .

Union Trust Co. v. McKinne

179 N.C. 328 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 17, 1920

Brown, J. … In Allen v.