Case law

Rogers v. . Jones

172 N.C. 156 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 4, 1916

Ed. to Thompson v. R. R., 147 N. C., 412 , especially Barringer v. Deal, 164 N. C., 249 , and cases cited, and Porter v. Lumber Co., 164 N. … This is familiar law, and it is clearly so stated by Brown, J., Fortune v. Hunt, 149 N. C., 362 , citing numerous cases. No error.

Cockman v. Powers

248 N.C. 403 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 21, 1958

Butner v. Spease, 217 N. C. 82, 88 , 6 S.E. 2d 808 , which cites Scott v. Shepherd, 2 Bl. 892 (Squib case). … J., in Ingle v. Cassady, 208 N.C. 497 , 181 S.E. 562 ; Simmons v. Rogers, 247 N.C. 340, 348 , 100 S.E. 2d 849 , and cases cited; 38 Am. Jur., Negligence Sec. 41; 65 C.J.S., Negligence Sec. 17.

Ford v. . Whedbee

21 N.C. 16 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1834

The cases of Craven v. Craven , 2 Dev. Eq. Cas., 344, and Redmond v. … Cited: Brown v. Brown , 27 N.C. 137 ; Redmond v. Van Hook , 38 N.C. 587 .

Wilson Lumber & Milling Co. v. Hutton & Bourbonnais Co.

159 N.C. 445 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 28, 1912

Brown v. House, 116 N. C., 866; Cox v. Cox, 91 N. C., 356 .” ’ The Court further said, quoting from Mayo v. Blount, 23 N. … In Brown v. House, 116 N.

Norris v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

174 N.C. 92 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 26, 1917

We cited several cases in Meadows v. Tel. … Durre v. Tel. Co., 161 N. W. Rep., 755 ; W. U. Tel. Co. v. Brown, 234 U. S., 542 .

In Re the Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust

366 N.C. 464 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 8, 2013

Maccene Brown, Gregory E. Pawlowski, John Christopher Lloyd, and Andre C. Brown, for respondent- appellee. Mallam J. … To the extent cases such as Mayers v.

State v. . Gill

195 N.C. 425 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 4, 1928

Adams, J., in White v. Hines, 182 N. C., 275 , said: “A prima facie case or evidence is that which his received or continues until the contrary is shown. … S. v. Abernethy, 190 N. C., 768 . No error.

Merchants Oil Co. v. Mecklenburg County

212 N.C. 642 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1937

its election to so renew said lease' by delivering a written notice to that effect, executed in its behalf by its president and its secretary and with its corporate seal affixed thereto, to the chairman or clerk of the board … Rountree v. Cohn-Bock Co., 158 N. C., 153 ; Bateman v. Lumber Co., 154 N. C., 248 ; 2 Story, Eq. Juris., secs. 1302, 1306; Donovan v. Niles, 246 Mass., 106 .

State v. Albarty

238 N.C. 130 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 12, 1953

S. v. Cole, 202 N.C. 592 , 163 S.E. 594 ; S. v. Carlson, 171 N.C. 818 , 89 S.E. 30 ; *132 S. v. Green, 151 N.C. 729 , 66 S.E. 564 ; S. v. Lunsford, 150 N.C. 862 , 64 S.E. 765 ; S. v. Hill, 79 N.C. 656 . … Supp. 57 ; Isom v. State, 71 Ga. App. 803 , 32 S.E. 2d 437 ; Powell v. State, 196 Miss. 331 , 17 So. 2d 524 ; State v. Jefferson, 19 N. J. Misc. 678, 23 A. 2d 406 ; Brown v. State, 139 Tex. Cr.

State v. Swaringen

249 N.C. 38 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 8, 1958

S. v. McLamb, 235 N.C. 251 , 69 S.E. 2d 537 ; S. v. Cuthrell, 233 N.C. 274 , 63 S.E. 2d 549 ; S. v. Brown, 225 N.C. 22 , 33 S.E. 2d 121 ; S. v. Yow, 227 N.C. 585 , 42 S.E. 2d 661 . … S. v. Cuthrell, 235 N.C. 173 , 69 S.E, 2d 233; S. v. Love, 229 N.C. 99 , 47 S.E. 2d 712 ; S. v. Snead, 228 N.C. 37 , 44 S.E. 2d, 359 ; S. v. Minton, 228 N.C. 15 , 44 S.E. 2d 346 ; Ward v. Mfg.

State v. Cheek

351 N.C. 48 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1999

State v. … Ed. 2d 177 (1997), and by State v. Vandiver, 321 N.C. 570 , 364 S.E.2d 373 (1988); State v. Young, 312 N.C. 669 , 325 S.E.2d 181 (1985); State v. Hill, 311 N.C. 465 , 319 S.E.2d 163 (1984); State v.

State v. . Cooke

176 N.C. 731 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 6, 1918

In S. v. … "The statutes does not specify how much or in what way she shall be supported, but simply that she shall be supported" ( Brown, J., in S. v.

Friedenwald Co. v. Sparger.

128 N.C. 446 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 4, 1901

As to the alleged failure on the part of the- defendant to properly describe the preferred debts, that matter was passed upon in Brown v. Nimocks, 124 N. C., 417 , and we do not feel disposed to overrule tbat decision. … In Hawkins v. Alston, 39 N. C., 137 , the debtor conveyed to his brother the whole of his property. In Jordan v. Newsome, 126 N.

Francis v. . Herren

101 N.C. 497 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1888

Boyd v. Turpin , 94 N.C. 137 ; Brem v. Lockhart , 93 N.C. 191 . … Cited: Stancill v. Spain , 133 N.C. 80 ; Trust Co. v. Sterchie , 169 N.C. 24 ; Realty Co. v. Carter , 170 N.C. 7 , 266 .

State v. Allen

346 N.C. 731 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 24, 1997

The General Assembly is authorized and empowered to create a Board of Paroles, provide for the appointment of the members thereof, and enact suitable laws defining the duties and authority of such Board to grant, revoke and … . § 14-34.1 (1995); State v. Bray, 321 N.C. 663, 670 , 365 S.E.2d 571, 575 (1988); State v. Mancuso, 321 N.C. 464, 468 , 364 S.E.2d 359, 362 (1988).

City of Raleigh v. Raleigh City Administrative Unit

223 N.C. 316 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 14, 1943

Champion v. Board of Health, supra; Drainage District v. Comrs. , 174 N.C. 738 , 94 S.E. 530 . See also Annotations 95 A.L.R., 689 , at page 700. … Hickory v. Catawba County , 206 N.C. 165 , 173 S.E. 56 . Compare Champion v. Board of Health, supra .

Cardwell v. Norfolk & Western Railway

171 N.C. 365 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1916

Hocutt v. R. R., 124 N. C., 214 ; Rice v. R. R., 130 N. C., 377 ; Davis v. Smith, 141 N. C., 108 , and cases cited to above in Anno. Ed.; Brown v. R. R., 165 N. C., 396 ; and there are many others in our Reports. … Waters v. Kear, 168 N. C., 246 ; Barcliff v. R. R., supra.

Bynum v. . Bynum

179 N.C. 14 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1919

Lawrence v. Hardy, 151 N. C., 123 ; Vick v. Flourney, 147 N. C., 209 ; Bernhardt v. Brown, 118 N. C., 701 . In Vick v. … And, in Lawrence v.

State v. Isley

164 N.C. 491 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 19, 1913

Tbe decision óf tbis appeal is controlled by S. v. Griffin, 154 N. … C., 611 , in wbicb tbe statute under Vbicb tbe defendant is indicted was fully discussed in an elaborate and learned opinion by Associate Justice Brown, and upon tbe authority of that case tbe judgment is reversed, with directions

Building and Loan Association v. . Swaim

198 N.C. 14 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 27, 1929

Substantially the same conclusion was reached in Gilbert v. Brown, 97 S. W. (Ky.), 40, 7 L. R. A. (N. S.), 1053, and in Maul v. Vaughn, 45 Ala., 134 . … See Felton v. Reid, 52 N. C., 269 ; Long v. Rankin, 108 N. C., 333 ; Wilcox v. Arnold, 116 N. C., 709 . The principles underlying these decisions must control in the case before us.