Case law

Walston v. Twiford

248 N.C. 691 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 17, 1958

Bradham v. Robinson, 236 N.C. 589 , 73 S.E. 2d 555 ; Saleeby v. Brown, 190 N.C. 138 , 129 S.E. 424 ; Stevens v. Turlington, 186 N.C. 191 , 119 S.E. 210 ; 36 Am. Jur. 717 and 718. … Kline v. McElroy, 296 S.W. 2d 664 (Mo.); DeLapp v. Anderson, 203 S.W. 2d 389 (Ky.); Farmer v. Farmer, 77 S.E. 2d 415 (Va.); Jones v.

IN RE BROWN

606 S.E.2d 900 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 13, 2004

Brown (respondent). … Bolick v. Am. Barmag Corp., 306 N.C. 364 , 293 S.E.2d 415 (1982) (holding that statutes of limitations are generally employed prospectively only); Flippin v.

State v. . Collins

115 N.C. 716 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1894

S. v. Hinman, ] Bald., 292; Foster and Faster, 1 Tex. Appeal, 533; George Rooks and Geo. W. … Brown v. State, 32 Texas, 124 ; Mary Etta and Marietta; 2 Texas Appl, 520; Minner and Miner, 15. Johns., N.

Nissen v. . Mining Company

104 N.C. 308 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1889

Armfield v. Brown , 70 N.C. 27 ; White v. Utley , 86 N.C. 415 ; Grant v. Hughes , 96 N.C. 177 . "The motion (for a reference) was not opposed, that is, was assented to. … Cited: Smith v. Hicks , 108 N.C. 251 ; Colgate v. Latta , 115 N.C. 138 ; Taylor v. Hunt , 118 N.C. 171 ; Sams v. Price , 119 N.C. 573 ; Bresee v. Crumpton , 121 N.C. 124 ; Jones v.

Ridout v. Rose's 5-10-25c Stores

205 N.C. 423 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 22, 1933

Compensation Law, sec. 60; Bryson v. Lumber Co., 204 N. C., 664 ; Johnson v. Bagging Co., 203 N. C., 579 ; Wimbish v. Detective Co., 202 N. C., 800 . … Canter v. Board of Education, 201 N. C., 836 ; Dependents of Phifer v. Dairy, 200 N. C., 65 . It follows that the death of tbe employees did not arise out of and in the course of their employment. Judgment Affirmed.

Town of Clinton v. Johnson

174 N.C. 286 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 10, 1917

Brown, J. … Allen v. R. R., 102 N. C., 386 ; Davis v. R. R., 19 N. C., 451 .

Sutton v. Bessent

133 N.C. 559 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1903

In this spirit I wrote, for a unanimous Court, the opinions in the cases of Brown v. Nimocks, 124 N. C., 417 , and Hall v. Cottingham, Ibid., 402, by which I must abide.

State v. Green

246 N.C. 717 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 16, 1957

G.S. 15-170; S. v. Roy and S. v. Slate, 233 N.C. 558 , 64 S.E. 2d 840 . … The instant case is not one where the uncontradicted evidence shows that the crime of rape has been committed like S. v. Brown, 227 N.C. 383 , 42 S.E. 2d 402 , where the defense was insanity, and S. v.

Rogers v. . Jones

172 N.C. 156 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 4, 1916

Ed. to Thompson v. R. R., 147 N. C., 412 , especially Barringer v. Deal, 164 N. C., 249 , and cases cited, and Porter v. Lumber Co., 164 N. … This is familiar law, and it is clearly so stated by Brown, J., Fortune v. Hunt, 149 N. C., 362 , citing numerous cases. No error.

State v. . Gill

195 N.C. 425 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 4, 1928

Adams, J., in White v. Hines, 182 N. C., 275 , said: “A prima facie case or evidence is that which his received or continues until the contrary is shown. … S. v. Abernethy, 190 N. C., 768 . No error.

Merchants Oil Co. v. Mecklenburg County

212 N.C. 642 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1937

its election to so renew said lease' by delivering a written notice to that effect, executed in its behalf by its president and its secretary and with its corporate seal affixed thereto, to the chairman or clerk of the board … Rountree v. Cohn-Bock Co., 158 N. C., 153 ; Bateman v. Lumber Co., 154 N. C., 248 ; 2 Story, Eq. Juris., secs. 1302, 1306; Donovan v. Niles, 246 Mass., 106 .

Davis v. North Carolina State Highway Commission

271 N.C. 405 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1967

Furniture Co. v. Bentwood Co., 267 N.C. 119 , 147 S.E. 2d 612 ; Nix v. English, 254 N.C. 414 , 119 S.E. 2d 220 ; Phillips v. Mining Co., 244 N.C. 17 , 92 S.E. 2d 429 ; Miller v. … Spain v. Brown, 236 N.C. 355 , 72 S.E. 2d 918 . The issue determined by the judge is the only issue which arises upon the pleadings. The order of the court below is, in all respects, .Affirmed.

State v. . Thomas

184 N.C. 757 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 13, 1922

In S. v. … Jarrett v. Trunk Co. , 144 N.C. 301 ; Matthews v. Myatt , 172 N.C. 233 ; Lea v. Utilities Co. , 176 N.C. 514 ; Beck v. Tanning Co. , 179 N.C. 127 ; Butler v. Mfg. Co. , 182 N.C. 552 .

State v. Taylor

236 N.C. 130 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 22, 1952

Defendant urges in support of his contention that the sale of liquor was made to an undercover investigator of the State Alcoholic Beverage Control Board whose duties are confined to the enforcement of the statutory law under … As a matter of fact, all undercover agents of tbe State Alcobolic Beverage Control Board are authorized “to see that all tbe laws relating to tbe sale and control of alcobolic beverages are observed and performed.”

State v. Swaringen

249 N.C. 38 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 8, 1958

S. v. McLamb, 235 N.C. 251 , 69 S.E. 2d 537 ; S. v. Cuthrell, 233 N.C. 274 , 63 S.E. 2d 549 ; S. v. Brown, 225 N.C. 22 , 33 S.E. 2d 121 ; S. v. Yow, 227 N.C. 585 , 42 S.E. 2d 661 . … S. v. Cuthrell, 235 N.C. 173 , 69 S.E, 2d 233; S. v. Love, 229 N.C. 99 , 47 S.E. 2d 712 ; S. v. Snead, 228 N.C. 37 , 44 S.E. 2d, 359 ; S. v. Minton, 228 N.C. 15 , 44 S.E. 2d 346 ; Ward v. Mfg.

Cabarrus Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Dep't of State Treasurer, Ret. Sys. Div.

824 S.E.2d 403 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 27, 2019

Francis v. . Herren

101 N.C. 497 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1888

Boyd v. Turpin , 94 N.C. 137 ; Brem v. Lockhart , 93 N.C. 191 . … Cited: Stancill v. Spain , 133 N.C. 80 ; Trust Co. v. Sterchie , 169 N.C. 24 ; Realty Co. v. Carter , 170 N.C. 7 , 266 .

State v. Cheek

351 N.C. 48 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1999

State v. … Ed. 2d 177 (1997), and by State v. Vandiver, 321 N.C. 570 , 364 S.E.2d 373 (1988); State v. Young, 312 N.C. 669 , 325 S.E.2d 181 (1985); State v. Hill, 311 N.C. 465 , 319 S.E.2d 163 (1984); State v.

Friedenwald Co. v. Sparger.

128 N.C. 446 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 4, 1901

As to the alleged failure on the part of the- defendant to properly describe the preferred debts, that matter was passed upon in Brown v. Nimocks, 124 N. C., 417 , and we do not feel disposed to overrule tbat decision. … In Hawkins v. Alston, 39 N. C., 137 , the debtor conveyed to his brother the whole of his property. In Jordan v. Newsome, 126 N.

State v. Allen

346 N.C. 731 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 24, 1997

The General Assembly is authorized and empowered to create a Board of Paroles, provide for the appointment of the members thereof, and enact suitable laws defining the duties and authority of such Board to grant, revoke and … . § 14-34.1 (1995); State v. Bray, 321 N.C. 663, 670 , 365 S.E.2d 571, 575 (1988); State v. Mancuso, 321 N.C. 464, 468 , 364 S.E.2d 359, 362 (1988).