Case law

Foot v. . Railroad

142 N.C. 51 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 18, 1906

R. v. Bryan , 107 Ind. 51 ; Express Co. v. Brown , 67 Miss. 261 . … Cited: Stewart v. Lumber Co. , 146 N.C. 51 , 61 , 68 , 77 , 102 ; Jones v. R. R. , 150 N.C. 481 .

State v. Lowry

263 N.C. 536 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 29, 1965

State v. Wilson, supra. A jury list is not discriminatory merely because it is made from the tax lists. Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 . … Hamm v. Virginia State Board of Elections, 230 F. Supp. 156 (ED, Va. 1964), affd., 85 S. Ct. 157 .

Rogers v. . Jones

172 N.C. 156 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 4, 1916

Ed. to Thompson v. R. R., 147 N. C., 412 , especially Barringer v. Deal, 164 N. C., 249 , and cases cited, and Porter v. Lumber Co., 164 N. … This is familiar law, and it is clearly so stated by Brown, J., Fortune v. Hunt, 149 N. C., 362 , citing numerous cases. No error.

Jackson v. Royall & Borden Manufacturing Co.

195 N.C. 18 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1928

Hoke, J., in Howard v. Oil Co., 174 N. C., 651 . … J., in Holton v. Lumber Co., 152 N. C., 68 .

Walker v. Walker

224 N.C. 751 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 13, 1944

See Setzer v. Setzer, 129 N. O., 296, 40 S. E., 62 ; Sanders v. Sanders, 167 N. C., 317 , 83 S. E., 489 ; Story v. Story, 221 N. C., 114 , 19 S. E. (2d), 136 . … Setzer v. Setzer, supra; Sanders v. Sanders, supra; and Story v. Story, supra. The welfare of the child is the paramount consideration, or, as stated In re Lewis, 88 N.

Burgess v. . Lovengood

55 N.C. 455 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1856

In Evans v. … The cases of Fentress v. Robbins , 4 N.C. 177 , Peagram v. King , 2 Hawks. Rep. 295, Ibid. 605. Deaver v. Erwin , 42 N.C. 250 , Dyche v.

Tucker v. . Satterthwaite

120 N.C. 118 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1897

Code, Sec. 391; Heilig v. Stokes, 63 N C., 612; Klutts v. McKenzie, 65 N. C., 102 ; Armfield v. Brown, 70 N. C., 27 ; Wright v. Cain, 93 N. C., 296 ; Patton v. Railroad, 96 N. C., 455 ; Fortesque v. Crawford. … Citing Budasill v. Falls, swpra. and Bowen v. Whitaker, supra. The same rule is laid in Allen v. Sallinger, 105 N. C., 333 ; Bottoms v. Railroad, 109 N. C., 72 ; Allen v. Allen, 114 N. C., 121 ; Fleming v.

Dellinger v. Lincoln County

369 N.C. 190 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 8, 2016

State v. Weaver

306 N.C. 629 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1982

Defendant made three phone calls, one of which was to Cassandra’s aunt, Martha Brown, who came to the doughnut shop to pick up Cassandra. … In Shankle v.

Walston v. Twiford

248 N.C. 691 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 17, 1958

Bradham v. Robinson, 236 N.C. 589 , 73 S.E. 2d 555 ; Saleeby v. Brown, 190 N.C. 138 , 129 S.E. 424 ; Stevens v. Turlington, 186 N.C. 191 , 119 S.E. 210 ; 36 Am. Jur. 717 and 718. … Kline v. McElroy, 296 S.W. 2d 664 (Mo.); DeLapp v. Anderson, 203 S.W. 2d 389 (Ky.); Farmer v. Farmer, 77 S.E. 2d 415 (Va.); Jones v.

State v. Yoder.

132 N.C. 1111 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 10, 1903

Its terms were adopted by the warrant issued thereon, and come up fully to all the requirements as set out in the following cases: S. v. Smith , 98 N.C. 747 ; S. v. Pool , 106 N.C. 698 ; S. v. … S. v. Witherspoon , 75 N.C. 222 ; S. v. Smith , 100 N.C. 550 ; S. v. Joyce , 121 N.C. 610 .

Town of Clinton v. Johnson

174 N.C. 286 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 10, 1917

Brown, J. … Allen v. R. R., 102 N. C., 386 ; Davis v. R. R., 19 N. C., 451 .

Moore v. . Industrial Co.

138 N.C. 304 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 9, 1905

Brown, J. It is contended by tbe plaintiff as follows: 1. Tbat tbe mortgage was improperly executed; 2. Tbat tbe defendant Samuel Newman was an incorporator and stock-bolder of tbe defendant company; and 3. … Holy Trinity Church v. U. S., 143 U. S., 464 ; Winder v. Caldwell, 14 How. (N. Y.,) 434; Parker v. Bell, 7 Gray (Mass.,) 429; Brockway v. Inniss, 39 Mich., 47 ; Wildner v. Ferguson, 42 Minn., 112 ; Farinholdt v.

Groome v. . Davis

215 N.C. 510 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 3, 1939

E., 539 ; Anthony v. Knight, 211 N. C., 637 , 191 S. E., 323 ; McCulley v. Anderson (Neb.), 227 N. W., 321 ; Richard v. Neault, 126 Maine, 17, 135 Atl., 524, 525 ; Brown v. Saunders, 44 Ga. App., 114 , 160 S. … Wooten v. Smith, ante, 48; Cunningham v. Haynes, 214 N. C., 456 , and cited cases; Anthony v. Knight, supra; Hinnant v. R. R., supra; Sebastian v. Motor Lines, supra; Brown v. R. R., 208 N. C., 57 , 179 S.

Beaty v. International Ass'n of Heat & Frost Insulators & Asbestos Workers

248 N.C. 170 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 9, 1958

He shall be an ex-officio member of all Local Union Committees and Boards. … Harrington v. Steel Products, 244 N.C. 675 , 94 S.E. 2d 803 ; Harrison v. Corley, 226 N.C. 184 , 37 S.E. 2d 489 ; Highway Com. v. Transportation Corp., 225 N.C. 198 , 34 S.E. 2d 78 ; Ruark v.

State v. Taylor

236 N.C. 130 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 22, 1952

Defendant urges in support of his contention that the sale of liquor was made to an undercover investigator of the State Alcoholic Beverage Control Board whose duties are confined to the enforcement of the statutory law under … As a matter of fact, all undercover agents of tbe State Alcobolic Beverage Control Board are authorized “to see that all tbe laws relating to tbe sale and control of alcobolic beverages are observed and performed.”

Pearson v. PEERLESS FLOORING COMPANY

247 N.C. 434 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 10, 1958

In subsequent cases, including Smith v. Paper Co., supra, Scott v. Lumber Co., supra, and Cooper v. … At the request of Peerless, Moore recommended Pearson; Pearson’s compensation was $2.25 per hour plus board and transportation from and to Jacksonville. As pointed out in Hayes v.

State v. . Collins

115 N.C. 716 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1894

S. v. Hinman, ] Bald., 292; Foster and Faster, 1 Tex. Appeal, 533; George Rooks and Geo. W. … Brown v. State, 32 Texas, 124 ; Mary Etta and Marietta; 2 Texas Appl, 520; Minner and Miner, 15. Johns., N.

Page v. . Page

167 N.C. 346 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 2, 1914

This is an action for a divorce from bed and board. It was before us, Page v. Page, 161 N. C., 170 , upon appeal from a decree granting alimony pendente lite. … In Sanders v. Sanders, 157 N.

Union Trust Co. v. McKinne

179 N.C. 328 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 17, 1920

Brown, J. … In Allen v.