Case law

Brown v. . Hoover

77 N.C. 40 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1877

Cited: Cheek v. Nall , 112 N.C. 374 . (42)

Brown v. . Payne

201 N.C. 398 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 30, 1931

R. v. Kitchin, 91 N. … See Bank v. Liles, 197 N. C., 413 , 149 S.

Shuford v. . Brown

201 N.C. 17 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1931

R. v. … R. v.

State v. . Brown

125 N.C. 606 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 17, 1899

In Burnett v. Railway Co., 120 N. C., 517 , this Court considered thq question in all its bearings, and cited a long list of tbe cases. We were not favored with an argument in behalf of tbe prisoner.

Brown v. . Plott

129 N.C. 272 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 3, 1901

On May the 8th, 1900, the defendant appealed from an order made by the Board of Commissioners of Iredell County, granting certain changes in the public road over the lands of the defendant. … Boing v. Railroad , 88 N.C. 62 ; Hahn v. Latham , 87 N.C. 172 .

Blair v. . Brown

116 N.C. 632 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1895

BROWN." … The doctrine laid down in Stone v. Marshall , 52 N.C. 300 , was overruled by Morris v. Pearson , 79 N.C. 253 . There is error also in his Honor's having given number 11 of plaintiff's prayer for instruction.

Cowper v. . Brown

228 N.C. 213 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 19, 1947

Brown, and driven by his codefendant, John K. Dawson, collided with the bicycles on which Paul Rouse, Lee Bell and George Rouse were riding. … Phillips v. Nessmith , 226 N.C. 173 , 37 S.E.2d 178 ; Wall v. Bain , 222 N.C. 375 , 23 S.E.2d 330 ; Pearson v. Luther , 212 N.C. 412 , 193 S.E. 739 ; Lincoln v. R. R. , 207 N.C. 787 , 178 S.E. 601 .

Grimes v. . Brown

113 N.C. 154 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1893

Brown and the plaintiff, growing out of their copartnership dealings. … It is not unlike the reference in Gudger v. Baird, 66 N. C., 438 , in which the order is in these words: “ This case is referred to W. M.

Brown v. . Cooper

85 N.C. 477 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1881

McKee v. Lineberger, 69 N. C., 217 .

State v. Brown

361 N.C. 149 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 2006

allowed for the limited purpose of (1) vacating that portion of the Court of Appeals opinion ordering remand to the trial court for resentencing and (2) remanding to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of State v.

Campbell v. . Brown

86 N.C. 375 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1882

In Lane v. … Cited: Rogers v. Clements , 92 N.C. 85 , 86 ; Rogers v. Clements , 98 N.C. 184 ; Houck v. Adams , 98 N.C. 522 ; Alston v. Hawkins , 105 N.C. 6 , 9 ; Johnson v. Lumber Co. , 144 N.C. 719 ; Saieed v.

State v. . Brown

60 N.C. 448 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1864

S. v. Duckworth, ante , 240. There is no ground upon which the motion to arrest the judgment can be sustained. … Pl., 53; S. v. Allen , 11 N.C. 356 . PER CURIAM. No error. Cited: S. v. Tytus , 98 N.C. 707 ; S. v. Christmas , 101 N.C. 755 . *Page 290

Gordon v. . Brown

39 N.C. 399 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1846

of his father to Thomas Brown. … McKee v. Houston , 7 N.C. 429 . Still less can a sale to raise a fund for the payment of legacies defeat a bona fide voluntary conveyance to or for a grandson.

Michael v. . Brown

215 N.C. 655 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 24, 1939

(Witness draws sketch on board to illustrate). My uncle says there was about 100 acres in those boundaries . . . … The drawing I have made on the board, as I understand it, is the land uncle asked me to sell the timber on as his agent.

Brown v. . Payne

181 N.C. 381 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 18, 1921

Basnight v. R. R., 111 N. C., 592 ; Wells v. R. R.. 51 N. C. 47 ; 10 C. J.. 231. *383 The ease of Bell v. R. R., 163 N.

Brown v. Texas Co.

237 N.C. 738 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1953

Hayes v. Elon College, 224 N.C. 11 , 29 S.E. 2d 137 ; Bass v. Wholesale Corp., 212 N.C. 252 , 193 S.E. 1 ; Beach v. McLean, 219 N.C. 521 , 14 S.E. 2d 515 ; McCraw v. Mills, Inc., 233 N.C. 524 , 64 S.E. 2d 658 ; Wood v. … Atkins v. Transportation Co., 224 N.C. 688 , 32 S.E. 2d 209 ; Ingram v. Smoky Mountain Stages, Inc., 225 N.C. 444 , 35 S.E. 2d 337 ; Caulder v. Gresham, 224 N.C. 402 , 30 S.E. 2d 312 ; Samuels v.

Brown v. . Williams

83 N.C. 684 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1880

Neither was the undertaking given in time, nor the appeal prosecuted as required by the rules of this court, as determined in Sever v. McLaughlin, 82 N. C., 342 , and Smith v. Lyon, Ibid., 2. Per Curiam.

Nesbit v. . Brown

16 N.C. 30 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1826

Cited: Robinson v. Lewis , 45 N.C. 61 ; Redmond v. Staton , 116 N.C. 143 . *Page 28 (35)

Brown v. . Brady

4 N.C. 13 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1812

In the case of Henry v.

Earnhardt v. . Brown

197 N.C. 204 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 15, 1929

Rendleman v. Stoessel, 195 N. C., 640 , 143 S. E., 219 . This is what the defendants are trying to accord the plaintiffs in the present suit. It is all they are entitled to receive. … Bank v. Klugg, 186 U. S., 202 . This distinguishes the instant case from Vallely v. Northern Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 254 U. S., 248 , strongly relied on by plaintiffs.