Case law

Neal v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.

224 N.C. 103 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 8, 1944

Grantham v. Grantham, supra; Price v. Askins, supra. … Citing several of the authorities used by Browne, and adding Andrews v. Broughton, 78 Mo. App., 179 ; Russell v. Briggs, 165 N. Y., 500 , 59 N. E., 303 ; Dyer v. Graves, 37 Yt., 369.; Clark v.

Tallassee Power Co. v. Savage

170 N.C. 625 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 12, 1916

McPhaul v. Gilchrist, 29 N. C., 169 ; Rogers v. Mabe, 15 N. C., pp. 180-194; Smith v. Auldridge, 3 N. C., 382 ; Hartsfield v. Westbrook, 2 N. C., 258 ; Brown v. Huger, *630 62 U. S., pp. 305-320-321. … In Hartsfield v. Westbrook, on a call from a poplar in a swamp thence down the swamp to the beginning, held that the swamp and not a straight line from the poplar to the beginning is the boundary. In Brown v.

Wilkinson v. . Wright

1 N.C. 509 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1801

Cited: Peace v. Nailing , 16 N.C. 295 ; Ashley v. Brown , 198 N.C. 372 .

Owens v. Blackwood Lumber Co.

212 N.C. 133 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 13, 1937

Brown v. Hillsboro, 185 N. C., 368 (372). The defendant contends that the deeds are improperly registered and do not comply with N. C. Code, 1935 (Michie), secs. 997, 3305, and 3308. … C., 136 ; Randolph v. Roberts,. 186 N. C., 621 ; Pace v. McAden, 191 N. C., 137 ; Brown v. Buchanan, 194 N. C., 675 . Walker McCall, a witness for plaintiffs, 85 years old, testified, in part: “Q. Now, Mr.

Wadsworth Land Co. v. Piedmont Traction Co.

162 N.C. 314 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 22, 1913

Co. v. R. R., 142 N. C., 423 . In McIntosh v. … Walker v. Power Co., 19 L. R. A. (N. S.), 725; Brown v. Gerald (Me.), 109 Am. St., 526; Collier v. R. R., 113 Tenn., 121 ; Lewis on Em. Dom. (3 Ed.), 314. In Street R. R. v. R.

Graeber v. . Sides

151 N.C. 596 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1909

Brown, J. There are two assignments of error: 1. That the court errer in refusing to dismiss the action or to nonsuit the plaintiff as to the defendant Annie A. Sides at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence. 2. … Catlin v. Catlin, Bush (Ky.), 141; Simpson v. Simpson, 80 N. C., 332 .

Johnson v. Armfield.

130 N.C. 575 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1902

In some phases it appears that plaintiff is suing for betterments for breach of a parol contract to convey land; in others it appears that he is suing for boarding and supporting defendant’s testatrix; and in others, for … Luton v. Badham, 127 N. C., 96 , 80 Am. St. Rep., 783 , 53 L. R. A., 337, and authorities there cited.

Allen v. Allen

263 N.C. 496 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1965

Brown v. Boger, ante, 248. Procedure is outlined by statute. G.S., Ch. 46. But in this state partition proceedings have been consistently held to be equitable in nature. Roberts v. … Barlowe, 260 N.C. 239 , 132 S.E. 2d 483 ; Mineral Co. v. Young, 220 N.C. 287 , 17 S.E. 2d 119 ; Raymer v. McLelland, 216 N.C. 443 , 5 S.E. 2d 321 ; Wolfe v. Galloway, 211 N.C. 361 , 190 S.E. 213 ; Clark v.

Owens v. Elliott

257 N.C. 250 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 23, 1962

Hemphill v. Board of Aldermen, 212 N.C. 185 , 193 S.E. 153 . … Chesson v. Jordan, 224 N.C. 289, 291 , 29 S.E. 2d 906 ; Scott v. Shackel *255 ford, 241 N.C. 738, 743 , 86 S.E. 2d 453 ; Hemphill v. Board of Aldermen, 212 N.C. 185 , 193 S.E. 153 .

Pasquotank County v. . Surety Co.

201 N.C. 325 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 16, 1931

In Ewbank v. … Presson v. Boone , 108 N.C. 79 ; Marshall v. Kemp , 190 N.C. 491 . In Williams v.

Loving v. Whitton

241 N.C. 273 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1954

Staley, 220 N.C. 573 , 18 S.E. 2d 239 ; Garner v. Pittman, 237 N.C. 328 , 75 S.E. 2d 111 ; and Matheny v. Motor Lines, 233 N.C. 673 , 65 S.E. 2d 361 . See also Aldridge v. Hasty, 240 N.C. 353 ; Smith v. … Matheny v. Motor Lines, supra; Brown v. Products Co., 222 N.C. 626 , 24 S.E. 2d 334 .

State and Another v. . Pate

44 N.C. 243 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1853

S. v. Floyd , 35 N.C. 382 . PER CURIAM. Judgment reversed, and venire de novo awarded. Cited: S. v. Brown , 46 N.C. 130 ; Adams v. Pate , 47 N.C. 15 ; S. v. Thompson , 48 N.C. 367 ; Ward v. Bell , 52 N.C. 80 ; S. v. … Waldrop . 63 N.C. 508 ; S. v. McIntosh , 64 N.C. 607 ; S. v. Green , 71 N.C. 174 ; S. v. Hickerson , 72 N.C. 422 ; S. v. Bryan , 83 N.C. 611 ; S. v. Collins , 85 N.C. 513 ; S. v. Wilkie, ibid. , 514; S. v.

Gilliam v. . Welch

15 N.C. 286 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1833

In the-case of Roberts v. Spicer, 5 Mad. 491, and Wills v. Seyers 4 Mad. 409, it was held that a legacy to a married woman , to and for her own use and benefit,” did not give' a separate estate. In Adanson v. … The court will not force a construction, to give the leg’acy to the separate use of the wife, Brown v. Clark, 2 Ves. 166.

Kinston v. . Loftin

149 N.C. 254 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 25, 1908

In Davidson v. … Cited: Kinston v. Wooten , 150 N.C. 298 ; Tarboro v. Staton , 156 N.C. 506 , 509 ; Marion v. Pilot Mountain , 170 N.C. 120 ; Drainage Commissioners v. Mitchell, ib. , 326; Dickson v.

Matter of Will of Lamparter

348 N.C. 45 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 3, 1998

Rogel v. Johnson, 114 N.C. … In re Will of Brown, 194 N.C. at 595 , 140 S.E. at 199 ; accord In re Will of Hester, 84 N.C.

Hudson v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY

242 N.C. 650 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1955

International Ass’n of Machinists v. Sandsberry, supra; Moore v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. and Ward v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company, supra; Hanson v. Union Pacific R. R. Co., supra. … Adair v. U. S., 208 U.S. 161 , 28 S. Ct. 277 , 52 L. Ed. 436 , 13 Ann. Cas. 764; Coppage v. Kansas, supra.

State v. . Price

81 N.C. 516 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1879

State v. Brown, 1 Jones, 129 . As the county has been indemnified, we do not see what the fraud upon tho woman has.to do with the question.

Bobbitt v. . Brownlow

62 N.C. 252 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1867

If the Master at June Term, 1864, had reported that the trustee had in hand cash sufficient to pay the debt of Brown-low, after discharging all of the debts secured by the deed, a decree against the trustee individually, … judgment of Brownlow, after dis *255 charging all of the debts secured by the deed of trust, the decree is erroneous; for there was nothing to create an individual liability, and the decree ought to have been as in Harrison v.

Swift Co. v. . Tempelos

178 N.C. 487 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 12, 1919

Fairfield Shoe Co. v. Olds, 176 Ind., 526 ; Cooney v. Sweat, 133 Ga., 511, 512 ; Taylor v. Folds, 2 Ga. App., 453 ; 9 Current Law, 1511. … Off & Co. v. Morehead, 126 Am. St. Rep., 184 -187. Rut it is contended tbat it was held in Plass v.

Taylor v. School Committee No. 17

50 N.C. 98 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1857

After providing in the 42 and 43 sections for the appointment, by the board of superintendants, of a committee of examination, and prescribing who may be teachers, the act, in the 44th section, declares that “ The School … It is true that the Court will not, ordinarily at least, interfere by mandamus where there is another specific legal remedy;” State v. Jones, 1 Ire. Rep. 134.