Case law

State v. . Norman

153 N.C. 591 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1910

This Court, in the case of State v. Moore, 129 N. … Brown v. Kinsey, 81 N. C., 245. In S. v. Vinson, 63 N.

State v. Holden

280 N.C. 426 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 28, 1972

State v. Perry, 231 N.C. 467 , 57 S.E. 2d 774 (1950); State v. Hoover, 252 N.C. 133 , 113 S.E. 2d 281 (1960). … State v. Browning, 78 N.C. 555 (1877). Accord, State v. Brinson, 277 N.C. 286 , 177 S.E. 2d 398 (1970); State v. Swaney, 277 N.C. 602 , 178 S.E. 2d 399 (1971).

Fore v. . Geary

191 N.C. 90 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 27, 1926

Orr v. Rumbough , 172 N.C. 754 . … In Brown v.

Sanderson v. . Sanderson

178 N.C. 339 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 22, 1919

Whittington v. Whittington, 19 N. C., 64 ; Moss v. Moss, 24 N. C., 56 ; Foy v. Foy, 35 N. C., 90 ; Tew v. Tew, 80 N. C., 316 ; Setzer v. Setzer, 128 N. C., 170 ; House v. House, 131 N. C., 140 . … Brown, J., who cast the deciding vote, makes it clear that this was the reason moving him, as he says in a concurring opinion: “It is contended that the plaintiff must allege and prove that the plaintiff is the'injured party

Bobbitt v. . Brownlow

62 N.C. 252 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1867

If the Master at June Term, 1864, had reported that the trustee had in hand cash sufficient to pay the debt of Brown-low, after discharging all of the debts secured by the deed, a decree against the trustee individually, … judgment of Brownlow, after dis *255 charging all of the debts secured by the deed of trust, the decree is erroneous; for there was nothing to create an individual liability, and the decree ought to have been as in Harrison v.

State v. . Price

81 N.C. 516 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1879

State v. Brown, 1 Jones, 129 . As the county has been indemnified, we do not see what the fraud upon tho woman has.to do with the question.

Allen v. Allen

263 N.C. 496 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1965

Brown v. Boger, ante, 248. Procedure is outlined by statute. G.S., Ch. 46. But in this state partition proceedings have been consistently held to be equitable in nature. Roberts v. … Barlowe, 260 N.C. 239 , 132 S.E. 2d 483 ; Mineral Co. v. Young, 220 N.C. 287 , 17 S.E. 2d 119 ; Raymer v. McLelland, 216 N.C. 443 , 5 S.E. 2d 321 ; Wolfe v. Galloway, 211 N.C. 361 , 190 S.E. 213 ; Clark v.

Loving v. Whitton

241 N.C. 273 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1954

Staley, 220 N.C. 573 , 18 S.E. 2d 239 ; Garner v. Pittman, 237 N.C. 328 , 75 S.E. 2d 111 ; and Matheny v. Motor Lines, 233 N.C. 673 , 65 S.E. 2d 361 . See also Aldridge v. Hasty, 240 N.C. 353 ; Smith v. … Matheny v. Motor Lines, supra; Brown v. Products Co., 222 N.C. 626 , 24 S.E. 2d 334 .

Reade v. . Durham

173 N.C. 668 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 30, 1917

See, also, Board, etc., of Winston v. Board, etc., of Forsyth County , 163 N.C. 404 . … Board of Elections , 217 N.C. 69 ; Valentine v. Gill, Comr. of Revenue , 223 N.C. 399 ; S. v. Emery , 224 N.C. 583 ; Perry v. Stancil , 237 N.C. 448 .

State v. Horton

275 N.C. 651 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 19, 1969

S. v. Simpson, ante, 325; S. v. Duncan, ante, 374; S. v. Simmons, supra; S. v. Grainger, 238 N.C. 739 , 78 S.E. 2d 769 ; S. v. Fulk, 232 N.C. 118 , 59 S.E. 2d 617 ; S. v. Frye, 229 N.C. 581 , 50 S.E. 2d 895 ; S. v. … Brown v. Brown, 264 N.C. 485 , 141 S.E. 2d 875 ; State v. Mangum, supra; State v. Henderson, 180 N.C. 735 , 105 S.E. *659 339; State v. Ellis, 97 N.C. 447 , 2 S.E. 525 ; State v. Overton, 75 N.C. 200 .

Howard v. . Early

126 N.C. 170 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 13, 1900

In Lee v. Pearce, 68 N. … Brown v. Mitchell, 102 N. C., 347 .

Woodruff v. . Bowles

104 N.C. 197 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1889

Following, and somewhat enlarging, the classification of cases of this kind, in Hardy v. Simpson, 13 Ired., 132 , this Court, in Brown v. Mitchell, 102 N. … Bump, on Fraudulent Con., 86; Brown v. Mitchell, supra; Bigelow on Fraud, 136.

Gibbs v. High Point, Thomasville & Denton Railroad

199 N.C. 806 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 20, 1930

The judgment is affirmed upon the authority of Brown v. Express Co., 192 N. C., 25 , 133 S. E., 414 , and Sumrett v. R. R., 152 N. C., 269 , 67 S. E., 585 . No error.

Lumber Co. v. . Hutton

159 N.C. 445 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 28, 1912

*Page 362 Whitaker v. Cover , 140 N.C. 280 , and authorities cited. … Campbell v. Branch , 49 N.C. 313 ; Corn v. McCrary , 48 N.C. 496 .

State v. Raines

319 N.C. 258 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1987

Brown, 333 U.S. 18, 25-26 , 92 L.Ed. 442 , 448 (1948). … If what purports to be two offenses actually is one under the Blockburger test, double jeopardy prohibits successive prosecutions, Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , 53 L.Ed. 2d 187 (1977); Harris v.

Owens v. Elliott

257 N.C. 250 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 23, 1962

Hemphill v. Board of Aldermen, 212 N.C. 185 , 193 S.E. 153 . … Chesson v. Jordan, 224 N.C. 289, 291 , 29 S.E. 2d 906 ; Scott v. Shackel *255 ford, 241 N.C. 738, 743 , 86 S.E. 2d 453 ; Hemphill v. Board of Aldermen, 212 N.C. 185 , 193 S.E. 153 .

State v. Brice

320 N.C. 119 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1987

State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563 , 313 S.E. 2d 585 (1984). … BROWN: —could help her father. The defendant asserts that this statement injected the prosecutor’s personal opinion and belief into the closing argument and was both incompetent and prejudicial. See State v.

State v. Sutton

230 N.C. 244 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 13, 1949

S. v. Flinchem, 228 N.C. 149 , 44 S.E. 2d 724 ; S. v. Friddle, supra; Spencer v. Brown, 214 N.C. 114 , 198 S.E. 630 ; Bowen v. Schnibben, 184 N.C. 248 , 114 S.E. 170 . … Williams v. Coach Company, 197 N.C. 12 , 147 S.E. 435 ; McNeill v. McNeill, 223 N.C. 178 , 25 S.E. 2d 615 , and cases cited; Lewis v. Watson, 229 N.C. 20 ; S. v. Fain, 229 N.C. 644 .

Hardware Mutual Fire Insurance v. Stinson

210 N.C. 69 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 29, 1936

This was approved by the Board of Equalization and Beview of Mecklenburg County. The amount plaintiff was due for tax was placed on the tax list and assessment roll for Mecklenburg County. … Co. v. Hyde, 315 Mo., 113 , 285 S. W., 65, 71 .” Black’s Law Dictionary (3d Ed.), p. 1404.

Powell v. Cross

268 N.C. 134 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1966

Spaugh, 227 N.C. 129 , 41 S.E. 2d 82 ; Brown v. Johnson, 207 N.C. 807 , 178 S.E. 570 ; Batson v. Laundry, 206 N.C. 371 , 174 S.E. 90 ; Hampton v. Spinning Co., 198 N.C. 235 , 151 S.E. 266 . … Wilson v.