Case law

In Re the Will of Thompson

248 N.C. 588 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 30, 1958

In re Will of Brown, 203 N.C. 347 , 166 S.E. 72 . See Goins v. McLoud, 231 N.C. 655 , 58 S.E. 2d 634 ; In re Will of Brown, 194 N.C. 583 , 140 S.E. 192 ; Rakestraw v. … See also Reel v. Reel, 8 N.C. 248 ; Howell v. Barden, 14 N.C. 442 ; Patterson v. Wilson, 101 N.C. 584 , 8 S.E. 229 ; In re Shelton’s Will, 143 N.C. 218 , 55 S.E. 705 ; Linebarger v.

Kelly v. Kelly

246 N.C. 174 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 1957

Searcy v. Logan, 226 N.C. 562 , 39 S.E. 2d 593 ; Self Help Corp. v. Brinkley, 215 N.C. 615 , 2 S.E. 2d 889 ; Hodges v. Stewart, 218 N.C. 290 , 10 S.E. 2d 723 ; Comrs. of Beaufort v. Rowland, supra; Stewart v. … Deans, 241 N.C. 1 , 84 S.E. 2d 321 ; Haith v. Roper, 242 N.C. 489 , 88 S.E. 2d 142 ; Baldwin v. Hinton, 243 N.C. 113 , 90 S.E. 2d 316 ; Brown v. Hurley, 243 N.C. 138 , 90 S.E. 2d 324 ; Trust Co. v.

Neal v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.

224 N.C. 103 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 8, 1944

Grantham v. Grantham, supra; Price v. Askins, supra. … Citing several of the authorities used by Browne, and adding Andrews v. Broughton, 78 Mo. App., 179 ; Russell v. Briggs, 165 N. Y., 500 , 59 N. E., 303 ; Dyer v. Graves, 37 Yt., 369.; Clark v.

Lytton Manufacturing Co. v. House Manufacturing Co.

161 N.C. 430 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 26, 1913

In Brown on Parol Evidence, sec. 117, it is stated as a recognized proposition that “Parol evidence is admissible te show an agreed mode of payment and discharge other than that specified in the bond.” … Mead v. McLoughlin, 42 Mo., 198 ; Foley and Woodside v. Mason, 6 Maryland, 37 ; Austin v. Welch, 72 S. W., 881 . In Woodson v. Beck, 151 N.

School Directors v. City of Asheville

137 N.C. 503 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 21, 1905

After an examination of the opinions written in Board, etc., v. Henderson, 126 N. C., 689 ; School Directors v. Asheville, 128 N. C., 249; Bearden v. Fullam, 129 N. … Board, etc., v. Greenville, supra. We presume that a large majority of the towns have acquiesced in the decisions and made settlement with the boards of education.

Sharpe v. . Jones

7 N.C. 306 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 5, 1819

In Stockstill v. Shuford , (311) 1 N.C. 638 , where the Defendants pleaded severally in trespass; some of the Defendants were acquitted, the rest were found guilty. … Cited: Hicks v. Gilliam , 15 N.C. 218 ; Stephens v. Batchelor , 23 N.C. 61 ; Roughton v. Brown , 53 N.C. 395 .

Badger v. . Daniel

77 N.C. 251 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1877

Worsley v. Earl of Scarboro, 3 Atk. 392; Isler v. Brown, 66 N. C. 556 ; Lewis v. Mew, 1 Stobhart Eq. 180, Price v. White, 1 Bailey Eq. 244 ; Le Neve v. Le Neve, 2 White & Tudor’s L. C. E., Am. Notes, 121.

Thomas v. . Watkins

193 N.C. 630 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 27, 1927

The jury found that defendants’ intestate owed plaintiff for “board and services $640, boarding horse $120, money advanced $198.50.” The defendants’ intestate died on 1 September, 1924. … Bond v. Cotton Mills, 166 N. C., p. 20; Chatham v. Realty Co., 174 N. C., p. 671; Croom v. Lumber Co., 182 N. C., 217 ; Bryant v. Lumber Co., 192 N. C., 607 .

Watson v. . Lee County

224 N.C. 508 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1944

Garrison v. Williams, 150 N. C., 674 , 64 S. E., 783 ; Aldridge Motors v. Alexander, 217 N. C., 750 , 9 S. E. (2d), 469 ; Jones v. Furniture Go., 222 N. O., 439, 23 S. E. (2d), 309 . In Elam v. Barnes, 110 N. … In Hull v. Hull, 225 N.'

City National Bank of Norfolk v. Bridgers

114 N.C. 383 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1894

Banking Co. v. Whitaker, 110 N. C., 348 ; Helms v. Green, 105 N. C., 264 ; Brown v. Mitchell, 102 N. C., 372 ; Reiger v. Davis, 67 N. … Hudson v. Jordan, 108 N. C., 10 .

Hamlet H.M.A., LLC v. Hernandez

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 6, 2019

Brown in Superior Court, Richmond County, and reversing and remanding the granting of a directed verdict as to defendant’s unfair and deceptive trade practices counterclaim. … HAMLET H.M.A., LLC V. HERNANDEZ Opinion of the Court Justice DAVIS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Blankenship v. Bartlett

362 N.C. 508 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 9, 2008

Johnson v. Gary BARTLETT, as Executive Director of the State Board of Elections, Roy Cooper, as Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, and the North Carolina State Board of Elections. No. 455PA06-2.

State v. . Speaks

94 N.C. 865 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1886

State v. Martin, 2 Ired., 101 ; Walker v. Baxter, 1 Ired., 203 . … State v. Suggs, 89 N. C., 531 ; Horah v. Knox, 87 N. C., 483 . There is no error.

Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Johnson

168 N.C. 304 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 24, 1915

Taylor v. Brown, 165 N. C., 161 . *308 "When so considered, we not only find no language in item 8 importing a trust, but when we look at the other parts of the will we nowhere find any trust declared. … Perkins v. Brinkley, 133 N. C., 86 ; Lummus v. Davidson, 160 N. C., 487 .

Broadway v. Blythe Industries, Inc.

313 N.C. 150 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 1985

E. g., Brown v. Fulford, 311 N.C. 205 , 316 S.E. 2d 220 . The essential elements of a claim for damages for wrongful death based on a theory of attractive nuisance are set forth above. … Riddle v. Artis, 243 N.C. 668 , 91 S.E. 2d 894 (1956). Accord McNair v. Boyette, 282 N.C. 230 , 192 S.E. 2d 457 (1972); Brown v. R.R. Co. and Phillips v. R.R. Co., 276 N.C. 398 , 172 S.E. 2d 502 (1970); Butner v.

Robinson v. . Daughtry

171 N.C. 200 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 22, 1916

Brown, 92 Ala., 522 : “If the several partners in a firm engaged in business of buying and selling real estate cannot bind the firm by purchases or sales of such property made in the regular course of business, then they … C., 361 ; Merrick v. Bedford, 141 N. C., 505 ; Blount v. Blount, 158 N. C., 313 .

Ashe v. . Gray

88 N.C. 190 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1883

In Scott v. Brown, 3 Jones, 541 , the action was for deceit in the sale of a jackass, and Nash, C. … Again, in Froelich v. South. Ex. Co., 67 N.

State v. . Cox

153 N.C. 638 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 23, 1910

S. v. Quick, 150 N. C., 825; S. v. Goode, 130 N. C., 651 ; S. v. Gooch, 94 N. C., 987 ; Bish. New Cr. Law, sec. 893. Exception 3 cannot be sustained. In S. v. Blevins, 138 N. … C., 599 ; S. v. Capps, 134 N. C., 622 ; S. v. Hicks, 125 N. C., 636 ; S. v. Booker, 123 N. C., 713 .

Whitfield v. . R. R.

147 N.C. 236 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 1, 1908

Burgin v. R. R. , 115 N.C. 673 . This rule is reiterated by the present Chief Justice in Johnson v. R. R. , 130 N.C. 488 , and enforced by Mr. Justice Walker in Morrow v. R. … Hunter v. R. R ., 112 N.Y. 378 . See, also, Denny v. R. R ., 132 N.C. (239) 340; Gordon v. R. R., ib. , 565. The motion to nonsuit is allowed and the action dismissed. Error.

Love v. . Bowen

55 N.C. 49 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1854

There is no controversy as to the facts o f case: the bill was drafted doubtless on the authority of Brown *50 v. Long, 2 Dev. and Bat. Eq. 138: Between that case and tliis, however, there is a substantial difference. … The subsequent case of Yarbrough v. Arrington, 5 Ire, Eq. 291, is decisive of this.