Case law

Alston v. . Hill

165 N.C. 255 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 1, 1914

Brown, J. This is a civil action, brought to set aside a certain deed of trust uxion the ground that its execution was procured by an agreement to suppress a criminal prosecution. … Lindsay v. Smith, 78 N. C., 329; Griffin v. Hasty, 94 N. C., 438 ; Commissioners v. March, 89 N. C., 268 .

Victory Cab Co., Inc. v. Shaw

232 N.C. 138 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 24, 1950

Motley v. State Board of Examiners, 228 N.C. 337 , 45 S.E. 2d 550 , 175 A.L.R. 253 ; Brumley v. Baxter, 225 N.C. 691 , 36 S.E. 2d 281 , 162 A.L.R. 930 ; Chimney Rock Co. v. … Board of Education, 210 N.C. 525 , 187 S.E. 781 ; Jewel Tea Company v. Troy, 80 F. 2d 366 .

Bailey v. . Long

172 N.C. 661 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 13, 1916

BRowN, J. The cause of action as stated in the complaint, upon demurrer, must, as to the facts alleged, be taken to be true. … In Baker v.

Caviness v. . Hunt

180 N.C. 384 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 17, 1920

Doyle v. Brown, 72 N. C., 393 ; Whitehurst v. Transportation Co., 109 N. C., 342 ; Carter v. Rountree, ibid., 29; Rutherford v. Ray, 147 N. C., 253 ; Rackley v. Roberts, 147 N. C., 201 ; Bailey v. Hopkins, 152 N. … C., 748 ; Hargrove v. Wilson, 148 N. C., 439 ; Glisson v. Glisson, 153 N. C., 185 ; Barefoot v. Musselwhite, ibid., 208.” Mason v. Miles, 63 N. C., 564 , is very much in point.

Brittain v. . Westhall

135 N.C. 492 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 24, 1904

Patton v. Brittain , 32 N.C. 8 ; Miller v. Lumber Co. , 66 N.C. 503 ; Brown v. Smith , 67 N.C. 245 . … Perkins, ib. , 94; Metal Co. v. R. R., ib. , 297; Cotton v. R. R. , 149 N.C. 230 ; Freeman v. Brown , 151 N.C. 114 ; Busbee v. Land Co., ib. , 514.

In Re the Will of Thompson

248 N.C. 588 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 30, 1958

In re Will of Brown, 203 N.C. 347 , 166 S.E. 72 . See Goins v. McLoud, 231 N.C. 655 , 58 S.E. 2d 634 ; In re Will of Brown, 194 N.C. 583 , 140 S.E. 192 ; Rakestraw v. … See also Reel v. Reel, 8 N.C. 248 ; Howell v. Barden, 14 N.C. 442 ; Patterson v. Wilson, 101 N.C. 584 , 8 S.E. 229 ; In re Shelton’s Will, 143 N.C. 218 , 55 S.E. 705 ; Linebarger v.

Kelly v. Kelly

246 N.C. 174 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 1957

Searcy v. Logan, 226 N.C. 562 , 39 S.E. 2d 593 ; Self Help Corp. v. Brinkley, 215 N.C. 615 , 2 S.E. 2d 889 ; Hodges v. Stewart, 218 N.C. 290 , 10 S.E. 2d 723 ; Comrs. of Beaufort v. Rowland, supra; Stewart v. … Deans, 241 N.C. 1 , 84 S.E. 2d 321 ; Haith v. Roper, 242 N.C. 489 , 88 S.E. 2d 142 ; Baldwin v. Hinton, 243 N.C. 113 , 90 S.E. 2d 316 ; Brown v. Hurley, 243 N.C. 138 , 90 S.E. 2d 324 ; Trust Co. v.

Lumber Co. v. Cedar Co.

142 N.C. 411 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 23, 1906

C., 121 ; Newton v. Brown, 134 N. C., 439 ; Roper Lumber Co. v. Wallace, 93 N. C., 22 ; Lewis v. Roper Lumber Co., 99 N. C., 11 . … Brown v. Rickard, 107 N. C., 639 ; Gudger v. Hensley, 82 N. C., 481 ; McCormick v. Monroe, 46 N. C., 13 ; Melton v. Monday, 64 N. C., 295 ; Scott v. Elkins, 83 N. C., 424 ; Midgett v. Wharton, 102 N. C., 14 ; King v.

White v. City of New Bern

146 N.C. 447 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1907

Brown v. Durham, 141 N. C., 249 ; City of Columbus v. Simms, 94 Ga., 483 ; Curraran v. Oil City, 183 Pa. St., p. 611; Macomber v. Taunton, 100 Mass., 255 ; Randall v. Railway, 106 Mass., 327 ; Freeport v. … Justice Dean, delivering the opinion in Carravan v.

Whitfield v. . R. R.

147 N.C. 236 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 1, 1908

Burgin v. R. R. , 115 N.C. 673 . This rule is reiterated by the present Chief Justice in Johnson v. R. R. , 130 N.C. 488 , and enforced by Mr. Justice Walker in Morrow v. R. … Hunter v. R. R ., 112 N.Y. 378 . See, also, Denny v. R. R ., 132 N.C. (239) 340; Gordon v. R. R., ib. , 565. The motion to nonsuit is allowed and the action dismissed. Error.

Adams Ex Rel. Adams v. Beaty Service Co.

237 N.C. 136 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 30, 1953

Hobbs v. Coach Co., 225 N.C. 323 , 34 S.E. 2d 211 , and cases cited. See also Henson v. Wilson, 225 N.C. 417 , 35 S.E. 2d 245 . And it is said in Wall v. … See Wilson v. Wilson, 190 N.C. 819 , 130 S.E. 834 ; Spencer v. Brown, 214 N.C. 114 , 198 S.E. 630 ; Lewis v. Watson, 229 *143 N.C. 20, 47 S.E. 2d 484 ; S. v. Washington, 234 N.C. 531 , 67 S.E. 2d 498 .

State v. . Jones

31 N.C. 38 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1848

State v. Ellar, 1 Dev. 207 . State v. Deberry, 5 Ire. 371. The perpetration is, in that case, subject to an indictment. … State v. Brown, 3 Mur. 224. State v. Baldwin, 1 Dev. & Bat. 195 . In the case before" us, the indictment does not charge the defendant with be* ing a common and notorious profane swearer.

Gibbs v. High Point, Thomasville & Denton Railroad

199 N.C. 806 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 20, 1930

The judgment is affirmed upon the authority of Brown v. Express Co., 192 N. C., 25 , 133 S. E., 414 , and Sumrett v. R. R., 152 N. C., 269 , 67 S. E., 585 . No error.

Hamlet H.M.A., LLC v. Hernandez

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 6, 2019

Brown in Superior Court, Richmond County, and reversing and remanding the granting of a directed verdict as to defendant’s unfair and deceptive trade practices counterclaim. … HAMLET H.M.A., LLC V. HERNANDEZ Opinion of the Court Justice DAVIS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Fisher v. CID Copper Mining Co.

105 N.C. 123 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1890

Andrews v. Whisnant, 83 N. C., 446 ; Bailey v. Brown, at this term. … Seymour v. Cohen, 67 N. C., 345 ; Sutton v. McMillan, 72 N. C., 102 ; Lyon v. McMillan, 72 N. C., 392 .

Anderson v. Talman Office Supplies, Inc.

234 N.C. 142 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1951

Maddox v. Brown, 232 N.C. 542 , 61 S.E. 2d 613 . … Williams v. Henderson, 230 N.C. 707 , 55 S.E. 2d 462 ; Cox v. Lee, 230 N.C. 155 , 52 S.E. 2d 355 .

State v. . Speaks

94 N.C. 865 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1886

State v. Martin, 2 Ired., 101 ; Walker v. Baxter, 1 Ired., 203 . … State v. Suggs, 89 N. C., 531 ; Horah v. Knox, 87 N. C., 483 . There is no error.

State v. . Cox

153 N.C. 638 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 23, 1910

S. v. Quick, 150 N. C., 825; S. v. Goode, 130 N. C., 651 ; S. v. Gooch, 94 N. C., 987 ; Bish. New Cr. Law, sec. 893. Exception 3 cannot be sustained. In S. v. Blevins, 138 N. … C., 599 ; S. v. Capps, 134 N. C., 622 ; S. v. Hicks, 125 N. C., 636 ; S. v. Booker, 123 N. C., 713 .

Broadway v. Blythe Industries, Inc.

313 N.C. 150 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 1985

E. g., Brown v. Fulford, 311 N.C. 205 , 316 S.E. 2d 220 . The essential elements of a claim for damages for wrongful death based on a theory of attractive nuisance are set forth above. … Riddle v. Artis, 243 N.C. 668 , 91 S.E. 2d 894 (1956). Accord McNair v. Boyette, 282 N.C. 230 , 192 S.E. 2d 457 (1972); Brown v. R.R. Co. and Phillips v. R.R. Co., 276 N.C. 398 , 172 S.E. 2d 502 (1970); Butner v.

Ashe v. . Gray

88 N.C. 190 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1883

In Scott v. Brown, 3 Jones, 541 , the action was for deceit in the sale of a jackass, and Nash, C. … Again, in Froelich v. South. Ex. Co., 67 N.