Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

0.59s

  • Ballou v. Road Commission

    182 N.C. 473 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 23, 1921

    In the case of Comrs. v. Bank, 181 N. C., 347 , speaking of this identical provision, it was said: “The present board cannot estop the option which, under the statute, they or their successors may exercise.” … Proctor v. Comrs., ante, 56. Under these decisions we think the second question must, therefore, be answered in the negative, rather than in the affirmative.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Charles S. Riley & Co. v. Carter

    165 N.C. 334 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 15, 1914

    Iron Co. v. Abernathy, 94 N. C., 545 ; S. v. Voight, 90 N. C., 741 ; S. v. Hunter, ib., 829. … Alsop v. Mosely, 104 N. C., 60 ; Bernhardt v. Brown, 122 N. C., 593 . There is, however, a distinction between judgments which create liens and decrees enforcing liens already existing.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Ponton v. . McAdoo

    71 N.C. 91 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1874

    Craycroff v. Morehead , 67 N.C. 422 ; Brown v. Hawkins , 65 N.C. 645 . It is therefore respectfully submitted that the Judge below committed no error in continuing the injunction to the hearing. … Heilig v. Stokes , 63 N.C. 612 ; Jarman v. Saunders , 64 N.C. 368 ; Craycroff v. Morehead , 67 N.C. 422 ; Brown v. Hawkins , 65 N.C. 645 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gibbs v. . Russ

    223 N.C. 349 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 1943

    E., 82 , in Rivenbark v. Oil Corp., 217 N. C., 592 , 8 S. E. (2d), 919 , and in Isley v. Winfrey, 221 N. C., 33 , 18 S. E. (2d), 702 , and referred to and discussed in Herndon v. Massey, 217 N. C., 610 , 8 S. … E., 854 ; Ledwell v. Milling Co., 215 N. C., 371 , 1 S. E. (2d), 841 ; Brown v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 217 N. C., 368 , 8 S. E. (2d), 199 ; Caulder v. *352 Motor Sales, Inc., 221 N. C., 437 , 20 S.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Corum v. Comer

    256 N.C. 252 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 12, 1962

    Bank v. Stack, 179 N.C. 514 , 103 S.E. 6 ; Godfrey v. Power Co., 190 N.C. 24 , 128 S.E. 485 ; Connor v. Manufacturing Co., 197 N.C. 66 , 147 S.E. 672 ; Wilson v. Ervin, 227 N.C. 396 , 42 S.E. 2d 468 ; Glass v. … Brown v. Thayer, 212 Mass. 392 , 99 N.E. 237 ; Jones v. Northwestern Auto Supply Co., 93 Mont. 224 , 18 P. 2d 305 ; Barnes v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Thomason v. . Hackney

    159 N.C. 299 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 28, 1912

    We held in Helms v. … In Cranford v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Matter of Will of Lamb

    303 N.C. 452 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 8, 1981

    In reaching that result, the Court of Appeals relied upon the cases of In re Will of Chatman, 228 N.C. 246 , 45 S.E. 2d 356 (1947) and McEwan v. Brown, 176 N.C. 249 , 97 S.E. 20 (1918). … The opinion of this Court in Brissie v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. . McKinnon

    223 N.C. 160 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 19, 1943

    S. v. Brown , 218 N.C. 415 , 11 S.E.2d 321 ; S. v. Hammonds , 216 N.C. 67 , 3 S.E.2d 439 ; S. v. Everhardt , 203 N.C. 610 , 166 S.E. 738 ; S. v. Casey , 201 N.C. 185 , 159 S.E. 337 ; S. v. … S. v. Chapman , 221 N.C. 157 , 19 S.E.2d 250 ; S. v. Wagstaff, 219 N.C. 15 , 12 S.E.2d 657 ; S. v. Brown , 218 N.C. 415 , 11 S.E.2d 321 ; S. v. Caper , 215 N.C. 670 , 2 S.E.2d 864 .

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • Scott v. Waccamaw Lumber Co.

    232 N.C. 162 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 24, 1950

    Brown v. Truck Lines, 227 N.C. 299 , 42 S.E. 2d 71 ; Hayes v. Elon College, 224 N.C. 11 , 29 S.E. 2d 137 ; Lassiter v. Cline, 222 N.C. 271 , 22 S.E. 2d 558 ; Graham v. Wall, 220 N.C. 84 , 16 S.E. 2d 691 ; Beach v. … Condon, 189 N.C. 748 , 128 S.E. 337 ; Cole v. Durham, 176 N.C. 289 , 97 S.E. 33 ; Gadsden v. Craft, 173 N.C. 418 , 92 S.E. 174 ; Patrick v. Lumber Co., 164 N.C. 208 , 80 S.E. 153 ; Johnson v. R.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Miller

    209 N.C. 170 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 22, 1936

    See Towe v. R. R., 165 N. C., 1 , 80 S. E., 889 ; Moore v. Powell, 205 N. C., 636 , 172 S. E., 327 ; Fox v. Barlow, 206 N. C., 66 , 173 S. E., 43 . … Therefore, Brown v. Wood, 201 N. C., 309 , 160 S. E., 281 , has no application to the instant case.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Jarrett v. . Holland

    213 N.C. 428 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 13, 1938

    Collingwood v. Brown, 106 N. C., 362 ; Arrington v. Arrington, 114 N. C., 151 ; Rollins v. Henry, supra. See Horney v. Price, 189 N. C., 820 . … Lumber Co. v. Humber Co., 150 N. C., 282 ; Womble v. Battle, 38 N. C., 182 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State v. Cooper

    238 N.C. 241 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 23, 1953

    Ex Parte Brede, 279 F. 147 ; Brown v. State, 74 Ala. 478 ; In re Danton, 108 Kan. 451 , 195 P. 981 ; State v. Huffstetter, 213 S.C. 319 , 49 S.E. 2d 585 . … S. v. Beasley, supra; S. v. Ayers, supra; S. v. Burnett, supra.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • State v. Fritz.

    133 N.C. 725 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1903

    State v. Brown, 82 N. C., 585 . Dueling is simply an aggravated form of affray (4 Bl. Com., 145), and under such indictment the parties may be convicted of a mutual fighting by consent without deadly weapon. … State v. Ray, 89 N. C., 587 ; State v. Fesperman, 108 N. C., 770 .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Hopkins v. . Bowers

    111 N.C. 175 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1892

    Humphrey v. Church, 109 N. C., 132 , and cases there cited. … The Code, § 1360; Kerchner v. Reiley, 72 N. C., 171 ; Katzenstein v. Railroad, 78 N. C., 286 ; besides, the matter was res judicata, Roulhac v. Brown, 87 N. C., 1 .

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Alston v. . Hill

    165 N.C. 255 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 1, 1914

    Brown, J. This is a civil action, brought to set aside a certain deed of trust uxion the ground that its execution was procured by an agreement to suppress a criminal prosecution. … Lindsay v. Smith, 78 N. C., 329; Griffin v. Hasty, 94 N. C., 438 ; Commissioners v. March, 89 N. C., 268 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Harrell v. Powell

    249 N.C. 244 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 10, 1958

    But it should be noted that Insulation Co. v. Davidson County, 243 N.C. 252 , 90 S.E. 2d 496 , and S. v. … who was a member of its board of aldermen to the City of New Bern.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Talley v. Harriss Granite Quarries Co.

    174 N.C. 445 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 31, 1917

    McKee v. Lineberger, 69 N. C., 217 ; Brittain v. Daniels, 94 N. C., 781 ; Faulk v. Thornton, 108 N. C., 314 ; Pendleton v. Dalton, 96 N. C., 507 ; Hunt v. Vanderbilt, 115 N. C., 559 ; Green v. Biggs, 167 N. C., 417 . … Buie v. Brown, 104 N. C., 335 . As a corollary of tbis rule, therefore, it may be said that a complaint cannot be overthrown by a demurrer unless it be wholly insufficient.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Caviness v. . Hunt

    180 N.C. 384 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 17, 1920

    Doyle v. Brown, 72 N. C., 393 ; Whitehurst v. Transportation Co., 109 N. C., 342 ; Carter v. Rountree, ibid., 29; Rutherford v. Ray, 147 N. C., 253 ; Rackley v. Roberts, 147 N. C., 201 ; Bailey v. Hopkins, 152 N. … C., 748 ; Hargrove v. Wilson, 148 N. C., 439 ; Glisson v. Glisson, 153 N. C., 185 ; Barefoot v. Musselwhite, ibid., 208.” Mason v. Miles, 63 N. C., 564 , is very much in point.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Byrd v. Express Co.

    139 N.C. 273 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 17, 1905

    And in Brown v. Kinsey, 81 N. … Cobb v. Fogalman, 23 N. C., 440 ; Wittkowsky v. Wasson, 71 N. C., 451 ; Sutton v. Madre, 47 N. C., 320 ; Pettiford v. Mayo, 117 N. C., 27 ; Lewis v. Steamship Co., 132 N. C., 904 .

    Cited 81 timesPublished
  • State v. . Arnold

    107 N.C. 861 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1890

    C., Term R, 163 (596); State v. Brickell, 1 Hawks, 354 ; State v. Lane, 4 Ired., 113 ; State v. Dula, Phil., 437. Nor would a misrecital of the county in the caption be ground of arrest of judgment. State v. … State v. Mace, 86 N. C., 668 ; State v. Cox, 6 Ired., 440 . The power of the Legislature to prescribe the form of indictment for murder is upheld in State v. Moore, 104 N. C., 743 , and State v. Brown, 106 N.

    Cited 34 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.