Case law

Howard v. J. H. Harris Plumbing Co.

154 N.C. 224 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 22, 1911

Tanner v. Lumber Co., 140 N. C., 475 . … Brown v. Louisburg, 126 N. C., 701 ; Burns v. Womble, 131 N. C., 173 .

State v. . Arnold

107 N.C. 861 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1890

C., Term R, 163 (596); State v. Brickell, 1 Hawks, 354 ; State v. Lane, 4 Ired., 113 ; State v. Dula, Phil., 437. Nor would a misrecital of the county in the caption be ground of arrest of judgment. State v. … State v. Mace, 86 N. C., 668 ; State v. Cox, 6 Ired., 440 . The power of the Legislature to prescribe the form of indictment for murder is upheld in State v. Moore, 104 N. C., 743 , and State v. Brown, 106 N.

J. D. Biggs & Co. v. Perkins

75 N.C. 397 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1876

Brown v. Gray, 6 Jones, 103 . All we have to do is to fix the limits of the rule, and to decide whether his Honor erred in his opinion that it defeated the plaintiffs’ cause of action.

Yarborough v. President & Directors of the State Bank

13 N.C. 23 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1828

Cited: Washington v. Sanders, post 345; Ramsour v. Young , 26 N.C. 135 ; Harding v. Spivey , 30 N.C. 65 ; McIver v. Ritter , 60 N.C. 607 ; Bates v. Lilly , 65 N.C. 233 ; Isler v. Brown , 66 N.C. 562 ; James v. … West , 76 N.C. 291 ; Pasour v. Rhyne , 82 N.C. 150 .

Abernathy v. . Skidmore

190 N.C. 66 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 24, 1925

Reece v. Woods, 180 N. C., 631 ; Johnson v. Cameron, 136 N. C., 243 ; Highsmith v. Page, 161 N. C., 355 ; Zollicoffer v. Zollicoffer, 168 N. C., 326 . We confine our decision strictly to tbe language in tbe statute. … We are not inadvertent to tbe interesting situation disclosed in Brown v. Adams, 174 N. C., 490 . For tbe reasons given, there must be a New trial.

Roller v. . McKinney

159 N.C. 319 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 22, 1912

Vaughan v. Davenport, post, 369. … Heaton v. Wilson, 123 N.

In re Will of Deyton

177 N.C. 494 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 21, 1919

Cases directly in point are Hodges v. So. Ry. Co., 122 N. C., 992 ; Brown v. A. C. L. R. R. Co., 161 N. C., 513 ; Horton v. F. C. Telephone Co., 146 N. C., 429 ; Embler v. Gloucaster Lumber Co., 167 N. … Although apt words. are not used, and the language is inartificial, the-Court will give effect to it where the intent is apparent, says Brown, J., in Kerr v. Girdwood, 138 N. C., 473; citing Henry v. Ballard, 4 N.

State v. Mason

337 N.C. 165 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 29, 1994

Brown [Defendant’s Attorney]: I understand, man. I can easily understand that. Oh, yes. Mr. Royster: What’s so funny, man? Mr. Brown: I’d be nervous, too. Mr. Campbell [Royster’s Attorney]: That was pretty funny to say. … Brown: To be honest with you, I’m going to be nervous being in court with you. Mr. Royster: Huh? Mr. Brown: I’m going to be nervous to be in court with you.

Cook v. Manufacturing Co.

183 N.C. 48 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 22, 1922

Speaking to this question, Brown, J., in Tanner v. Lumber Co., 140 N. … Justice *56 Brown in Tanner v. Lumber Co., 140 N.

Griffin v. Watkins

269 N.C. 650 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 22, 1967

Rudd v. Stewart, 255 N.C. 90 , 120 S.E. 2d 601 ; Burchette v. Distributing Co., 243 N.C. 120 , 90 S.E. 2d 232 ; 35 N.C. L. Rev. 247 (1957). See Sharpe v. Hanline, 265 N.C. 502 , 144 S.E. 2d 574 ; Brown v. … Shives v. Sample, 238 N.C. 724, 726 , 79 S.E. 2d 193, 195 .

State v. Hyde

352 N.C. 37 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 16, 2000

Ed. 2d 177 (1997), and by State v. Vandiver, 321 N.C. 570 , 364 S.E.2d 373 (1988); State v. Young, 312 N.C. 669 , 325 S.E.2d 181 (1985); State v. Hill, 311 N.C. 465 , 319 S.E.2d 163 (1984); State v. … Adams, 347 N.C. 48, 77 , 490 S.E.2d 220, 236 (1997) (quoting State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 231 , 358 S.E.2d 1, 34 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L.

State v. Jones

264 N.C. 134 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 24, 1965

S. v. Cook, 242 N.C. 700, 703 , 89 S.E. 2d 383 , and cases cited. … In this connection, see S. v. Stinson, 263 N.C. 283 , 139 S.E. 2d 558 , and cases cited; S. v. Brown, 263 N.C. 786 , 140 S.E. 2d 786 .

State v. Ewing.

127 N.C. 555 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 27, 1900

Crimes, 312, and S. v. Wilhite , II Humph., 602. In S. v. Williams , 31 S.C. 96 , the charge was an assault and rioting in one count. The jury returned a true bill as an assault, no bill as to rioting. … Brown , 81 N.C. 568 , where it is held that a bill of indictment returned into Court "Not a true bill' can not be amended and reconsidered by the same grand jury, for the reasons there stated.

State v. Ross

269 N.C. 739 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 29, 1967

Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S. Ct. 397 , 97 L. ed. 469. … In State v.

Herring v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

144 N.C. 208 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1907

Cureton v. … Clement v. Ireland, 138 N. C., 139 ; Rhoulac v. Brown, 87 N. C., 1 .

Charles S. Riley & Co. v. W. T. Sears & Co.

151 N.C. 187 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 20, 1909

Jones v. Wooten, supra; Brown v. Nimocks, 126 N. C., p. 808; Hailey v. Gray, 93 N. C., 195 ; Driller Co. v. Worth, 117 N. C., p. 515. … As said by Merrimon, J., in Hailey v.

Davis v. City of Charlotte

242 N.C. 670 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1955

S. v. Ray, 131 N.C. 814 , 42 S.E. 960 ; S. v. McGee, 237 N.C. 633 , 75 S.E. 2d 783 . … shall be by the board of commissioners of the county.”

Byrd v. Express Co.

139 N.C. 273 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 17, 1905

And in Brown v. Kinsey, 81 N. … Cobb v. Fogalman, 23 N. C., 440 ; Wittkowsky v. Wasson, 71 N. C., 451 ; Sutton v. Madre, 47 N. C., 320 ; Pettiford v. Mayo, 117 N. C., 27 ; Lewis v. Steamship Co., 132 N. C., 904 .

Haire v. Haire.

141 N.C. 88 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 1906

*89 Brown, J. According to tbe answer of Daniel L. Smith, answering for himself and infant defendants, W. M. … Richardson v. Skolfield, 45 Maine, 389.

Trust Co. v. . Currie

190 N.C. 260 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 14, 1925

Bernhardt v. Brown, 122 N. C., 587, 593 . In Lytle v. Lytle, 94 N. … See, also, Redmond v. Staton, 116 N. C., 140 ; Shackelford v. Staton, 117 N. C., 73 ; Valentine v. Britton, 127 N. C., 57 ; Wilson v. Lumber Co., 131 N. C., 163 ; Wilkes v. Miller, 156 N. C., 428 .