Case law

Griffin v. Watkins

269 N.C. 650 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 22, 1967

Rudd v. Stewart, 255 N.C. 90 , 120 S.E. 2d 601 ; Burchette v. Distributing Co., 243 N.C. 120 , 90 S.E. 2d 232 ; 35 N.C. L. Rev. 247 (1957). See Sharpe v. Hanline, 265 N.C. 502 , 144 S.E. 2d 574 ; Brown v. … Shives v. Sample, 238 N.C. 724, 726 , 79 S.E. 2d 193, 195 .

Woodard v. Carteret County

270 N.C. 55 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 12, 1967

Co. v. … Ed. 2d. 506, applies to representation on the Board of County Commissioners; (2) if so, whether'the apportionment accomplished in Carteret County by the 1963 and 1965 Acts meets the general standards' suggested in Roman v

McCutchen v. McCutchen

360 N.C. 280 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 27, 2006

v. … Brown, 124 N.C. App. at 378-79, 381 , 477 S.E.2d at 236, 238 .

McLendon v. . Commissioners

71 N.C. 38 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1874

That actual demand for payment of said coupons was made on the 15th day of February, 1872, at the Bank of Wadesborough and (40) upon the Board of County Commissioners; that the Board refused to pay said coupons unless the … Cited: Hawley v. Comrs. , 82 N.C. 24 ; Fry v. Comrs. , 82 N.C. 305 ; Bank v. Harris , 84 N.C. 210 ; Leach v. Comrs. , 84 N.C. 831 ; Self v. Shugart , 135 N.C. 195 ; Oldham v. Riegar , 145 N.C. 257 ; Silk co. v.

Davis v. City of Charlotte

242 N.C. 670 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1955

S. v. Ray, 131 N.C. 814 , 42 S.E. 960 ; S. v. McGee, 237 N.C. 633 , 75 S.E. 2d 783 . … shall be by the board of commissioners of the county.”

Henderson v. . Shannon

12 N.C. 147 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1827

So in the case of Brown v. … Approved: Coor v. Spicer , 65 N.C. 401 ; Bascom v. Smith , 66 N.C. 537 ; Weith v. Wilmington , 68 N.C. 24 ; Ward v. Sugg , 113 N.C. 494 . *Page 99 (152)

Jackson v. Baggett

237 N.C. 554 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 15, 1953

In Burgess v. … G.S. 1-73, 1-163; Insurance Co. v. Motor Lines, Inc., supra ( 225 N.C. 588 ); Lake Erie & W. R. Co. v. Falk, 62 Ohio St. 297 , 56 N.E. 1020; Barnhill v. Brown, 58 Ohio App. 188, 16 N.E. 2d 478 .

Parker v. North Carolina Railroad

150 N.C. 433 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1909

Logan v. Railroad, 116 N. C., 940 ; Brown v. Railroad, 131 N. … Dunn v. Barnes, 73 N. C., 273 ; Clark’s Code (3d Ed.), sec. 272, p. 295, and notes. The case of Morgan v. Harris, 141 N. C., at p. 360, is directly in point.

State v. . Saleeby

183 N.C. 740 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1922

S. v. Lytle, 138 N. C., 738 ; S. v. Boyd, 175 N. C., 791 , and S. v. Publishing Co., 179 N. C., 720 . … S. v. Ingram, 180 N. C., 673 . Besides, C. S., 3383, provides: “It shall not be necessary to allege a sale to a particular person.” S. v. Brown, 170 N.

Newbern v. . Newbern

178 N.C. 3 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 10, 1919

Sowell v. Barrett, 45 N. C., 50 , citing Streator v. Jones, 10 N. C., 423 ; Kelly v. Bryan, 41 N. … To tbe same effect is Brown v. Carson, 45 N. C., 274 , and tbe citations to that case, and to Kelly v. Bryan, supra, in tbe Anno. Ed. Also tbe most recent cases, Newton v. Clark, 174 N. C., 393 , and Williamson v.

Whitley v. Redden

276 N.C. 263 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 30, 1970

Murphy, 176 N.C. 671 , 97 S.E. 648 ; In re Hinton, 180 N.C. 206 , 104 S.E. 341 ; In re Will of Brown, 194 N.C. 583 , 140 S.E. 192 ; In re Will of Brown, 203 N.C. 347 , 166 S.E. 72 ; In re Will of Lomax, 226 N.C. 498 , 39 … Bunn v. Todd, 107 N.C. 266 .” Accord: Bissett v. Bailey, 176 N.C. 43 , 96 S.E. 648 ; Hathaway v. Hathaway, 91 N.C. 139 .

State v. Ross

269 N.C. 739 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 29, 1967

Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S. Ct. 397 , 97 L. ed. 469. … In State v.

State v. Ewing.

127 N.C. 555 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 27, 1900

Crimes, 312, and S. v. Wilhite , II Humph., 602. In S. v. Williams , 31 S.C. 96 , the charge was an assault and rioting in one count. The jury returned a true bill as an assault, no bill as to rioting. … Brown , 81 N.C. 568 , where it is held that a bill of indictment returned into Court "Not a true bill' can not be amended and reconsidered by the same grand jury, for the reasons there stated.

Ratchford v. . City of Gastonia

177 N.C. 375 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 29, 1919

For an interesting discussion of the subject, see Walker v. Jameson, 49 Am. St., 222. … The only authority relied on to the contrary is S. v. Hill, 126 N. C., 1140 .

Hodges v. Virginia-Carolina Railway Co.

179 N.C. 566 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 19, 1920

Brown, J. The grounds of demurrer are: “(a) It appears from the face of the complaint that the alleged negligence of the defendant was not the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s intestate’s injury. … In Drum v. Miller, 135 N.

In Re Tart

180 N.C. 105 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1920

Brown, J. The plaintiff is the second wife and widow of P. G. A. … Newman v. Bost, 122 N. C., 524 ; Wilson v. Featherstone, 122 N. C., 747 ; Medlock v. Powell, 96 N. C., 499 ; Duckworth v. Orr, 126 N. C., 676 , approved in Patterson v. Trust Co., 157 N. C., 14 . Affirmed.

Cummings v. Carroll

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 17, 2021

We’ll need to get a few boards replaced on the columns as  CUMMINGS V. … Brown v. Roth, 133 N.C. App. 52, 54–55 (1999) (cleaned up) (emphasis added).

Ballou v. Road Commission

182 N.C. 473 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 23, 1921

In the case of Comrs. v. Bank, 181 N. C., 347 , speaking of this identical provision, it was said: “The present board cannot estop the option which, under the statute, they or their successors may exercise.” … Proctor v. Comrs., ante, 56. Under these decisions we think the second question must, therefore, be answered in the negative, rather than in the affirmative.

Haire v. Haire.

141 N.C. 88 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 1906

*89 Brown, J. According to tbe answer of Daniel L. Smith, answering for himself and infant defendants, W. M. … Richardson v. Skolfield, 45 Maine, 389.

Charles S. Riley & Co. v. Carter

165 N.C. 334 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 15, 1914

Iron Co. v. Abernathy, 94 N. C., 545 ; S. v. Voight, 90 N. C., 741 ; S. v. Hunter, ib., 829. … Alsop v. Mosely, 104 N. C., 60 ; Bernhardt v. Brown, 122 N. C., 593 . There is, however, a distinction between judgments which create liens and decrees enforcing liens already existing.