Case law

Yarborough v. President & Directors of the State Bank

13 N.C. 23 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1828

Cited: Washington v. Sanders, post 345; Ramsour v. Young , 26 N.C. 135 ; Harding v. Spivey , 30 N.C. 65 ; McIver v. Ritter , 60 N.C. 607 ; Bates v. Lilly , 65 N.C. 233 ; Isler v. Brown , 66 N.C. 562 ; James v. … West , 76 N.C. 291 ; Pasour v. Rhyne , 82 N.C. 150 .

Basnight v. Dare Lumber Co.

184 N.C. 51 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1922

The facts in the case at bar are strikingly similar to those in Chesson v. Cedar Works, 172 N. … The principles governing the case at bar are fully discussed in Chesson v. Cedar Works, supra, and Stephens v. Lumber Co., 160 N.

Fairley Bros. v. Abernathy

190 N.C. 494 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 18, 1925

McLean, Jr., are alleged to be insolvent; and tbe relief sought is not tbe recovery of tbe debt and a sale of tbe property as incidental thereto, as in Piano Co. v. Newell, 177 N. … Woodard v. Sauls, 134 N. C., 274 ; Brown v. Cogdell, 136 N. C., 32 ; Edgerton v. Games, 142 N. C., 223 ; Clow v. McNeill, 167 N. C., 212 ; Mfg. Co. v. Brower, 105 N. C., 440. Tbe judgment is Affirmed.

England v. . Garner

90 N.C. 197 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1884

Jennings v. Stafford, 1 Ired., 404 ; Williams v. Harrington, 11 Ired., 616 ; University v. Lassiter, S3 N. C., 38; Ivey v. McKinnon, 84 N, C., 651; Sutton v. Schonwald, 86 N. C., 198 ; Gilbert v. … Brown, 72 N. C., 393 , sustained the plaintiffs’ contention. We have examined that case and do not think that a proper interpretation of it is in conflict with what we have here said.

Patrick v. . Springs

154 N.C. 270 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 1, 1911

Brown, J. The record discloses that this action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages suffered by reason of being-asphyxiated while plaintiff was a guest in defendant’s hotel in Washington, N. C. … Ten Brock v. Wells, 47 Fed., 670 ; West v. Thomas, 97 Ala., 622 ; Stanley v. Bircher, 78 Mo., 245 ; 16 Am. and Eng., 547; Sandys v. Florence, 47 L. J. C. Pl., 598; 22 Cyc., 1081. .

State v. Hyde

352 N.C. 37 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 16, 2000

Ed. 2d 177 (1997), and by State v. Vandiver, 321 N.C. 570 , 364 S.E.2d 373 (1988); State v. Young, 312 N.C. 669 , 325 S.E.2d 181 (1985); State v. Hill, 311 N.C. 465 , 319 S.E.2d 163 (1984); State v. … Adams, 347 N.C. 48, 77 , 490 S.E.2d 220, 236 (1997) (quoting State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 231 , 358 S.E.2d 1, 34 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L.

Woodard v. Carteret County

270 N.C. 55 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 12, 1967

Co. v. … Ed. 2d. 506, applies to representation on the Board of County Commissioners; (2) if so, whether'the apportionment accomplished in Carteret County by the 1963 and 1965 Acts meets the general standards' suggested in Roman v

McCutchen v. McCutchen

360 N.C. 280 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 27, 2006

v. … Brown, 124 N.C. App. at 378-79, 381 , 477 S.E.2d at 236, 238 .

McLendon v. . Commissioners

71 N.C. 38 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1874

That actual demand for payment of said coupons was made on the 15th day of February, 1872, at the Bank of Wadesborough and (40) upon the Board of County Commissioners; that the Board refused to pay said coupons unless the … Cited: Hawley v. Comrs. , 82 N.C. 24 ; Fry v. Comrs. , 82 N.C. 305 ; Bank v. Harris , 84 N.C. 210 ; Leach v. Comrs. , 84 N.C. 831 ; Self v. Shugart , 135 N.C. 195 ; Oldham v. Riegar , 145 N.C. 257 ; Silk co. v.

Henderson v. . Shannon

12 N.C. 147 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1827

So in the case of Brown v. … Approved: Coor v. Spicer , 65 N.C. 401 ; Bascom v. Smith , 66 N.C. 537 ; Weith v. Wilmington , 68 N.C. 24 ; Ward v. Sugg , 113 N.C. 494 . *Page 99 (152)

Haire v. Haire.

141 N.C. 88 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 1906

*89 Brown, J. According to tbe answer of Daniel L. Smith, answering for himself and infant defendants, W. M. … Richardson v. Skolfield, 45 Maine, 389.

Jackson v. Baggett

237 N.C. 554 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 15, 1953

In Burgess v. … G.S. 1-73, 1-163; Insurance Co. v. Motor Lines, Inc., supra ( 225 N.C. 588 ); Lake Erie & W. R. Co. v. Falk, 62 Ohio St. 297 , 56 N.E. 1020; Barnhill v. Brown, 58 Ohio App. 188, 16 N.E. 2d 478 .

Kirk v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air-Line Railway Co.

94 N.C. 625 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1886

Brown the fireman. … Thus in Skipp v. East Co. R. R.

Henofer v. Realty Loan & Guaranty Co.

178 N.C. 584 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 3, 1919

McGee v. Craven, 106 N. C., 355 ; Sherrill v. Hagan, 92 N. C., 345 ; Currie v. Hawkins, 118 N. C., 593 , cited and approved; Brown v. Hobbs, 147 N. C., at p. 77. … That case cites to tbe •same effect Turner v. Vann (Allen, J.), 171 N. C., 129 ; Bethell v. McKinney, 164 N. C., 78 ; Stern v. Benbow, 151 N. C., 462 , and Smathers v. Gilmer, 126 N. C., 757 .

Parker v. North Carolina Railroad

150 N.C. 433 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1909

Logan v. Railroad, 116 N. C., 940 ; Brown v. Railroad, 131 N. … Dunn v. Barnes, 73 N. C., 273 ; Clark’s Code (3d Ed.), sec. 272, p. 295, and notes. The case of Morgan v. Harris, 141 N. C., at p. 360, is directly in point.

State v. . Saleeby

183 N.C. 740 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1922

S. v. Lytle, 138 N. C., 738 ; S. v. Boyd, 175 N. C., 791 , and S. v. Publishing Co., 179 N. C., 720 . … S. v. Ingram, 180 N. C., 673 . Besides, C. S., 3383, provides: “It shall not be necessary to allege a sale to a particular person.” S. v. Brown, 170 N.

Newbern v. . Newbern

178 N.C. 3 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 10, 1919

Sowell v. Barrett, 45 N. C., 50 , citing Streator v. Jones, 10 N. C., 423 ; Kelly v. Bryan, 41 N. … To tbe same effect is Brown v. Carson, 45 N. C., 274 , and tbe citations to that case, and to Kelly v. Bryan, supra, in tbe Anno. Ed. Also tbe most recent cases, Newton v. Clark, 174 N. C., 393 , and Williamson v.

Ross Realty Co. v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co.

296 N.C. 366 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 4, 1979

Eure, 188 N.C. 716 , 125 S.E. 484 (1924); State v. Burnett, 173 N.C. 750 , 91 S.E. 597 (1917); Abernethy v. Board of Commissioners, 169 N.C. 631 , 86 S.E. 577 (1915); McLeod v. … Board of Commissioners, 148 N.C. 77 , 61 S.E. 605 (1908); Blair v. Coakley, 136 N.C. 405 , 48 S.E. 804 (1904). In State v.

Williams v. . May

173 N.C. 78 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 7, 1917

They are similar to those approved by this Court in Clark v. Wright, 167 N. C., 646 . … Tbe case, we think, differs very materially from Linville v. Nissen, 162 N. C., 95 .

Whitley v. Redden

276 N.C. 263 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 30, 1970

Murphy, 176 N.C. 671 , 97 S.E. 648 ; In re Hinton, 180 N.C. 206 , 104 S.E. 341 ; In re Will of Brown, 194 N.C. 583 , 140 S.E. 192 ; In re Will of Brown, 203 N.C. 347 , 166 S.E. 72 ; In re Will of Lomax, 226 N.C. 498 , 39 … Bunn v. Todd, 107 N.C. 266 .” Accord: Bissett v. Bailey, 176 N.C. 43 , 96 S.E. 648 ; Hathaway v. Hathaway, 91 N.C. 139 .