Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

1.68s

  • Johnson v. Atlantic & North Carolina Railroad

    130 N.C. 488 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 13, 1902

    Neal v. Railroad, 126 N. C., 634 , 49 L. R. A., 684, is put upon tbe ground that, taking all tbe plaintiff’s evidence to be true, be bad proved bis own contributory negligence. But sucb is not tbe case bere. … Browne v. Railroad, 109 N. C., 34 . Was there evidence to justify thus leaving the issue of contributory negligence to the jury?

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Perry v. Norfolk Southern Railroad

    180 N.C. 290 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 10, 1920

    Shepard v. R. R., 166 N. C., 539 , and Elkin v. R. R., 86 S. E., 762 .” Brown v. R. R., 171 N. … R., Hunt v. R. R., and Brown v. R. R. are cited and approved in Dail v. R. R., 176 N.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Aycoth

    270 N.C. 270 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 3, 1967

    S. v. Strickland, 229 N.C. 201, 207 , 49 S.E. 2d 469, 473 ; S. v. Green, 251 N.C. 40, 46 , 110 S.E. 2d 609, 613 , and cases cited. … S. v. Brown, 266 N.C. 55 , 145 S.E. 2d 297 .

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Rowland v. Home Building & Loan Ass'n

    211 N.C. 456 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1937

    Whitehurst v. Bowers, 205 N. C., 541 , 172 S. E., 180 ; Morehead v. Montague, 200 N. C., 497 , 157 S. E., 793 ; Doggett v. Vaughan, 199 N. C., 424 , 154 S. E., 660 ; Bank v. Dortch, 186 N. C., 510 , 120 S. … “It (The Rule) applies when the same persons will take the same estate, whether they take by descent or purchase; in which case they are made to take by descent”- — Brown, J., in Tyson v. Sinclair, 138 N. C., 23 , 50 S.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Hunt

    330 N.C. 501 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 10, 1992

    State v. Robinson, 327 N.C. 346 , 395 S.E.2d 402 (1990); State v. Brown, 327 N.C. 1 , 394 S.E.2d 434 (1990); State v. Hunt, 323 N.C. 407 , 373 S.E.2d 400 (1988), sentence vacated on other grounds, 494 U.S. 1022 , 108 L. … See State v. Brown, 306 N.C. 151, 179 , 293 S.E.2d 569, 587 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1080 , 74 L. Ed. 2d 642 (1982).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Huddleston v. . Hardy

    164 N.C. 210 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 3, 1913

    This is what we decided in Fortune v. Hunt, 149 N. … "Why is not the same true, as to this deed, if after delivery the grantor “cannot by a subsequent act defeat the effect of the delivery,” as Justice Brown said in Fortune v. Hunt?

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Crouse v. . Barham

    174 N.C. 460 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 31, 1917

    *462 Brown, J. It is unnecessary to consider whether the children of Mary E. … C., 453 ; Dew v. Barnes, 54 N. C., 150 . In the case of Baker v. Pender, 50 N.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Tea Co. v. . Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue

    199 N.C. 433 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 17, 1930

    Rep., 496 ; Brown-Forman Co. v. Kentucky , 217 U.S. 563 , 573 , 54 L.Ed., 883 , 887 , 30 Sup. Ct. Rep., 578 ; Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Wakefield Twp. , 247 U.S. 350 , 353 , 62 L.Ed., 1154 , 1156 , 38 Sup. Ct. … Brown-Forman Co. v. Kentucky , 217 U.S. 54 , L.Ed., 883. The tax is not unreasonable or discriminatory. Ohio Oil Co. v. Conway, supra . The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • State v. . Mansfield

    207 N.C. 233 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 31, 1934

    S. v. Clemmons, past, 276. Const. of N. C., Art. I, sec. 17; Const. of U. S., Amendment V. In Richardson v. Egerton, 186 N. … S. v. Addington, 143 N. C., 685 ; S. v. Liles, 134 N. C., 735 ; S. v. Edwards, 110 N. C., 511 . In the Liles case, supra, the matter is fully discussed and authorities cited.”

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Wellborn v. . Simonton

    88 N.C. 266 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1883

    To the allowance of eight instead of ten dollars per month in the charge for board, and two dollars and a half additional for lodging and fuel. 2. … Pearsall v. Mayers, 64 N. C., 549 . The account must be reformed upon this basis.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Edwards v. . Cobb

    95 N.C. 5 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1886

    ( Brittain v. Mull , 91 N.C. 498 ; Barnes v. Brown , 79 N.C. 401 ; Simpson v. Jones , 82 N.C. 323 ; Murrill v. Sandlin , 86 N.C. 54 ; Taylor v. Biddle , 71 N.C. 1 ; In re Brinson , 73 N.C. 278 ; McFayden v. … The Code , §§ 103, par. 3, 1397, 1400, 2171; Barnes v. Brown , 79 N.C. 401 ; Simpson v. Jones , 82 N.C. 323 ; Murrill v. Sandlin , 86 N.C. 54 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Baker v. Martin

    330 N.C. 331 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 6, 1991

    See Lassiter v. Board of Education, 248 N.C. 102, 112 , 102 S.E.2d 853, 861 (1958); Airport Authority v. … Finally, to adopt Justice Mitchell’s view would call into question the numerous appointments to the various state licensing boards, such as the Board of Barber Examiners and Board of Cosmetic Art Examiners, all of which require

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • Wood v. . Barber

    90 N.C. 76 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1884

    In McIntyre v. … Brown v. Teague, 7 Jones, 573 .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • State v. Taylor

    230 N.C. 566 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 16, 1949

    G.S. 4-1; In re Taylor, 229 N.C. 297 , 49 S.E. 2d 749 ; Roughton v. Brown, 53 N.C. 393 ; Williams v. Edwards, 34 N.C. 118 ; Lassiter v. Harper, 32 N.C. 392 ; Tyler v. Morris, 20 N.C. 625 . See Massie v. … IV, Sec. 8; S. v. Lawrence, 81 N.C. 522 ; S. v. Green, 85 N.C. 600 . See, also, note to Halford v. Alexander, 46 Am. Dec. 253 -257.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • State v. Buchanan

    130 N.C. 660 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 22, 1902

    Tbisi we understand to be the law of this State, and it was so held as early as State v. Brown, 2 N. C., 100 , 1 Am. Dec., 548 , which has been cited with approval in State v. Cutshall, 110 N. C., 538 , 16 L. R. … A., 130; State v. Hall, 114 N. C., 909 , 28 L. R. A., 59, 41 Am. St. Rep., 822 ; and this is distinctly stated to be the law in Wharton’s Criminal Law, Sec. 930.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Davis v. B. J. Smith & Co.

    113 N.C. 94 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1893

    Woodruff v. Bowles, 104 N. C., 197 ; Brown v. Mitchell, 102 N. C., 347 ; Hardy v. Simpson, 13 Ired., 132 . … Allen v. Grissom, 90 N. C , 90; Clement v. Foster, 3 Ired. Eq., 213 ; Rankin v. Jones, 2 Jones’ Eq., 169.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Caldwell v. . Neely

    81 N.C. 114 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1879

    Copeland v. Sauls, 1 Jones, 70 ; Johnson v. Watts, Ibid., 228; Feimster v. McRorie, Ibid., 547; Barwick v. Wood, 3 Jones, 306 ; Brown v. … Cloud v. Webb, 3 Dev., 317 , reaffirmed on second appeal, 4 Dev., 290 ; Covington v. Stewart, 77 N. C., 148 ; Neely v. Neely, 79 N. C., 478 .

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • Walters v. Rocky Mount Sash & Blind Co.

    154 N.C. 323 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1911

    Holton v. Lumber Co., 152 N. C., 68 . As was said by Brown, J., in Shaw v. Mfg. Co., 146 N. … Noble v. Lumber Co., 151 N. C., 16 ; Horne v. R. R., 153 N. C., 239 ; Pressly v. Yarn *326 Mills, 138 N. C., 410; Hicks v. Mfg. Co., ib., 326; Lloyd v. Hanes, 126 N. C., 359 ; Sims v. Lindsay, 122 N. C., 678 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Edwards v. . Ashcraft

    201 N.C. 246 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 2, 1931

    against the defendant Rhyne was to the effect that, at a meeting of the directors on 10 May, 1924, at which Ashcraft, Rhyne and Cherry were present, Cherry, who was secretary of the company, “made a verbal report to the board … Swann v. Martin, 191 N. C., 404 ; S. v. Wrenn, 198 N. C., 260 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Fisher

    318 N.C. 512 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 18, 1986

    State v. Brown, 315 N.C. 40, 58 , 337 S.E. 2d 808, 822 (1985). … Hopkins, 433 F. 2d 1041 (5th Cir. 1970); Brown v. State, 6 Md.

    Cited 78 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.