Case law

Bray v. . Baxter

171 N.C. 6 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 15, 1915

The referee based his, conclusion, which was affirmed by the judge, upon Revisal, sec. 4347, and the decisions in Mitchell v. Alley, 126 N. C., 84 , and Deloatch v. Rogers, 86 N. C., 357 . … In Quinn v. Lattimore, 120 N.

Price v. Norfolk Southern Railroad

179 N.C. 279 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1920

Brown, J. We have examined the several exceptions to the evidence, and find no substantial error in them, certainly none that would justify us in ordering another trial, and we do not deem it necessary to discuss them. … Duvall v. R. R., 161 N. C., 448 ; Roberts v. Baldwin, 155 N. C., 276 ; Davenport v. R. R., 148 N. C., 287 .

Taylor v. Town of Wake Forest

228 N.C. 346 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 10, 1947

Chambers v. Oil Co., 199 N. C., 28 , 153 S. E., 594 ; Harden v. Furniture Co., supra; Canter v. Board of Education, 201 N. C., 836 , 160 S. E., 924 ; Walker v. Wilkins, Inc., 212 N. C., 627 , 194 S. E., 89 ; Plemmons v. … The uncontradicted evidence is: (1) That Taylor “was already a township constable,” and the mayor acting under authority from the Board of Commissioners of the Town of Wake Forest, asked him “if he would serve in this capacity

Mason v. . Johnston

215 N.C. 95 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 1, 1939

Pusey v. R. R., 181 N. C., 137 ; Campbell v. R. R., 201 N. C., 102 ; York v. York, 212 N. C., 695 (699). In Norfleet v. Hall, 204 N. … The first place of the motorcycle hitting the car must have been around that running board and crushed in here where the left hand fender and running board join.” T. E.

Garland v. . Watt

26 N.C. 287 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1844

events specified in the will, is not too remote, and is good by way of executory devise ; and it belongs to that class of executory devises which permits a fee to be limited on a fee, and the leading case on rvhich is Pells v … Brown, Cro.

State v. Ball

255 N.C. 351 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1961

Brown, J., in interpreting the meaning of the words “immediately” and “forthwith,” said in Claus v. … Beaver v. Scheidt, 251 N.C. 671 , 111 S.E. 2d 881 . If the period of revocation is to begin on the date of conviction, the Legislature may so provide by amending the present statutes.

Mangum v. . Mangum

151 N.C. 270 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 11, 1909

Brown, J. … Milsaps v. Estes, 137 N. C., 535 .

Mewborn v. City of Kinston

199 N.C. 72 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 2, 1930

Adams v. Durham, 189 N. C., 232 , 126 S. E., 611 ; Holmes v. Fayetteville, 197 N. C., 740 , 150 S. E., 624 ; Nash v. Monroe, 198 N. C., 306 . … Plott v. Commissioners, 187 N. C., 125 , 126 S. E., 190 .

Cogdell v. . Telegraph Co.

135 N.C. 431 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 17, 1904

because the addressee happened to spell his name Browne? … Cited: Hunter v. Tel. Co., post , 469; Harrison v. Tel. Co. , 136 N.C. 381 ; Green v. Tel. Co., ib. , 492; Carter v. Tel. Co. , 141 N.C. 378 ; Helms v. Tel. Co. , 143 N.C. 392 ; Woods v. Tel.

Wyman v. . Taylor

124 N.C. 426 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 11, 1899

Barnhardt v. Brown , 122 N.C. 587 ; Iron Co. v. Edwards , 110 N.C. 353 ; Gudger v. Hensley , 82 N.C. 481 . … Barnhardt v. Brown, Iron Co. v. Edwards , and Gudger v. Hensley, supra .

Hudson v. . Morton

162 N.C. 6 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 16, 1913

Morton bid on the lot at the public sale made by the board of education and that he owned the Wiley Hudson tract except one acre. Edwards v. Dean, 125 N. C., 61 , is very much like this case. … In Perry v. Scott, 109 N.

Whitaker v. Gilliam

125 N.C. 76 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 17, 1899

Collingwood v. Brown, 106 N. C., 362 ; Arrington v. Arrington, 114 N. C., 156 . A party recovers a tract of land in the Superior Court. … (Herndon v. Insurance Co., 111 N. C., 384 ;Horton v. Green, 104 N.

Carter v. . Sams

20 N.C. 321 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1838

The same (323) opinion is given in Bates v. Cooke , 17 E. C. L. Rep., 231. Second exception: the arbitrators do not award that the defendant pay the plaintiff any amount except the cost. … Cited: Ballard v. Mitchell , 53 N.C. 157 ; Thompson v. Deans , 59 N.C. 26 ; Stevens v. Brown , 82 N.C. 462 ; Osborne v. Calvert , 83 N.C. 370 . *Page 259

In Re Lowe

180 N.C. 140 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1920

BROWN, J., concurring; WALKER, J., dissenting; ALLEN, J., concurring in dissenting opinion. … Struth v. Decker , 100 Md. 368 .

Ponder v. Cobb

257 N.C. 281 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1962

Ramsey v. Cheek, supra, and cases cited * * In Alexander v. … Ramsey v. Cheek, supra.

Alford v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.

202 N.C. 719 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 18, 1932

See' Brown v. R. R., ante, 256; Bruce v. Stutz Motor Co., 148 N. E., 161 ; American Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Hamilton, 135 S. E., 21 . … Blade v. Power Co., 158 N. C., 468 , 74 S. E., 468 . Modified and affirmed.

Nation Ford Baptist Church, Inc. v. Davis

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 19, 2022

Nevertheless, over the next few months and against the wishes of the Board, Pastor Davis continued to conduct  NATION FORD BAPTIST CHURCH V. … If the trial court determines that the Board acted outside the scope of the authority afforded to  NATION FORD BAPTIST CHURCH V.

State v. Wilson

237 N.C. 746 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1953

S. v. Wilson, 221 N.C. 365 , 20 S.E. 2d 273 . Rut a warrant cannot be amended so as to charge a different offense. S. v. Goff, 205 N.C. 545 , 172 S.E. 407 ; S. v. Clegg, 214 N.C. 675 , 200 S.E. 371 ; S. v. … Brown, 225 N.C. 22 , 33 S.E. 2d 121 ; Carson v. Doggett, 231 N.C. 629 , 58 S.E. 2d 609 , and numerous other cases.

Williams v. . Kerr

113 N.C. 306 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1893

DeCourcy v. Bair, 45 N. C., 181 ; Todd v. Outlaw, 79 N. C., *310 235; Duke v. Markham, 105 N. C., 131 , and cases cited; Devlin on Deeds, §§487, 488. … In Collingwood v. Brown, 106 N.

Brice v. Robertson House Moving, Wrecking & Salvage Co.

249 N.C. 74 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 29, 1958

Young v. Whitehall Co., 229 N.C. 360 , 49 S.E. 2d 797 ; Cook v. Lumber Co., 217 N.C. 161 , 7 S.E. 2d 378 ; Farmer v. Lumber Co., 217 N.C. 158 , 7 S.E. 2d 376 ; Gowens v. … Key v. Board of Education, 170 N.C. 123 , 86 S.E. 1002 ; Harris v. Board of Education, 216 N.C. 147 , 4 S.E. 2d 328 ; Russ v. Woodard, 232 N.C. 36 , 59 S.E. 2d 351 .