Case law

Price v. Norfolk Southern Railroad

179 N.C. 279 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1920

Brown, J. We have examined the several exceptions to the evidence, and find no substantial error in them, certainly none that would justify us in ordering another trial, and we do not deem it necessary to discuss them. … Duvall v. R. R., 161 N. C., 448 ; Roberts v. Baldwin, 155 N. C., 276 ; Davenport v. R. R., 148 N. C., 287 .

Mason v. . Johnston

215 N.C. 95 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 1, 1939

Pusey v. R. R., 181 N. C., 137 ; Campbell v. R. R., 201 N. C., 102 ; York v. York, 212 N. C., 695 (699). In Norfleet v. Hall, 204 N. … The first place of the motorcycle hitting the car must have been around that running board and crushed in here where the left hand fender and running board join.” T. E.

State v. Gatlin

241 N.C. 175 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1954

S. v. Lassiter, 208 N.C. 251 , 179 S.E. 891 ; S. v. Cannon, 218 N.C. 466 , 11 S.E. 2d 301 ; S. v. Hill, 224 N.C. 782 , 32 S.E. 2d 268 ; S. v. Yow, 227 N.C. 585 , 42 S.E. 2d 661 ; S. v. … . *177 Moreover, this Court in S. v. Godwin, 138 N.C. 582 , 50 S.E. 277 , in opinion by Brown, J., epitomizing previous decisions of tbis Court, beginning with S. v.

Foy v. Winston.

135 N.C. 439 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 17, 1904

Vanderbilt v. Brown , 128 N.C. 501 ; Bradley v. R. R. , 126 N.C. 740 ; Willis v. R. R. , 122 N.C. 909 , and several other cases there cited. … In an action by this same plaintiff against the defendant for a different injury, Foy v.

State v. . Grigg

104 N.C. 882 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1889

The definition of an “innocent woman ” given in State v. Davis , has been approved since in State v. Brown, 100 N. C., 519 , and State v. Hinson, 103 N. … Equally with State v.

Mewborn v. City of Kinston

199 N.C. 72 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 2, 1930

Adams v. Durham, 189 N. C., 232 , 126 S. E., 611 ; Holmes v. Fayetteville, 197 N. C., 740 , 150 S. E., 624 ; Nash v. Monroe, 198 N. C., 306 . … Plott v. Commissioners, 187 N. C., 125 , 126 S. E., 190 .

Ponder v. Cobb

257 N.C. 281 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1962

Ramsey v. Cheek, supra, and cases cited * * In Alexander v. … Ramsey v. Cheek, supra.

Porter v. White.

128 N.C. 42 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 12, 1901

Sprague v. Bond, 115 N. C., 530 ; Egerton v. Jones, 107 N. C., 284 : Green v. Sherrod, 105 N. C., 191 ; Norris v. McLamb, 104 N. C., 159 ; Egerton v. Jones, 102 N. C., 278 ; Link v. Link, 90 N. C., 238 ; Bonham v. … C., 224 ; Briant v. Corpening, 62 N. C., 325 ; Brown v. Carson, 45 N., C., 272; McDonald v. McLeod, 36 N. C., 221 ; and other cases. But the plaintiff does not come within this class.

Hudson v. . Morton

162 N.C. 6 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 16, 1913

Morton bid on the lot at the public sale made by the board of education and that he owned the Wiley Hudson tract except one acre. Edwards v. Dean, 125 N. C., 61 , is very much like this case. … In Perry v. Scott, 109 N.

McKellar v. . McKay

156 N.C. 283 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 18, 1911

BrowN, J. This proceeding for partition of the land described in the pleadings was commenced in 1882, and appears never to have been brought to a final conclusion. … Harrison v. Hargrove, 109 N. C., 346 . Perhaps plaintiff may have had other evidence to offer.

Whitaker v. Gilliam

125 N.C. 76 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 17, 1899

Collingwood v. Brown, 106 N. C., 362 ; Arrington v. Arrington, 114 N. C., 156 . A party recovers a tract of land in the Superior Court. … (Herndon v. Insurance Co., 111 N. C., 384 ;Horton v. Green, 104 N.

Carter v. . Sams

20 N.C. 321 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1838

The same (323) opinion is given in Bates v. Cooke , 17 E. C. L. Rep., 231. Second exception: the arbitrators do not award that the defendant pay the plaintiff any amount except the cost. … Cited: Ballard v. Mitchell , 53 N.C. 157 ; Thompson v. Deans , 59 N.C. 26 ; Stevens v. Brown , 82 N.C. 462 ; Osborne v. Calvert , 83 N.C. 370 . *Page 259

In Re Lowe

180 N.C. 140 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1920

BROWN, J., concurring; WALKER, J., dissenting; ALLEN, J., concurring in dissenting opinion. … Struth v. Decker , 100 Md. 368 .

Wake Forest Golf & Country Club, Inc. v. Town of Wake Forest

365 N.C. 359 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 9, 2011

719 S.E.2d 21 (2011) WAKE FOREST GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB, INC. v. TOWN OF WAKE FOREST, Vivian A. … Jones, in her official capacity as Mayor, Chris Kaeberlein, Anne Hines, Frank Drake, Pete Thibodeau, Margaret Stinnett, in their official capacities as members of the Wake Forest Board of Commissioners. No. 303P11.

Thornton v. Southern Railway

150 N.C. 691 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 19, 1909

Brown, J. There appears to be abundant evidence in tbe record to warrant tbe conclusion that tbe fire originated -on tbe .right of way of defendant and was caused by sparks from its engine. … See, also, Jackson v. *693 Commissioners, 18 N. C., 117 ; Ruffin v. Overby, 88 N. C., 369 ; Osborne v. Ballew, 34 N. C., 373 ; Lamb v. Swain, 48 N. C., 370 .

Alford v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.

202 N.C. 719 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 18, 1932

See' Brown v. R. R., ante, 256; Bruce v. Stutz Motor Co., 148 N. E., 161 ; American Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Hamilton, 135 S. E., 21 . … Blade v. Power Co., 158 N. C., 468 , 74 S. E., 468 . Modified and affirmed.

Nation Ford Baptist Church, Inc. v. Davis

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 19, 2022

Nevertheless, over the next few months and against the wishes of the Board, Pastor Davis continued to conduct  NATION FORD BAPTIST CHURCH V. … If the trial court determines that the Board acted outside the scope of the authority afforded to  NATION FORD BAPTIST CHURCH V.

Duncan v. . Gulley

199 N.C. 552 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 15, 1930

Brown v. Sheets, 197 N. C., at p. 273, 63 A. L. R., 1357. … In Best v. Utley, 189 N.

Duke Land & Improvement Co. v. Town of Murphy

179 N.C. 133 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1919

*134 Brown, J. The court instructed the jury that if they believed all the evidence they should answer the first issue “No,” and the second issue “Yes.” In this instruction there was error. … Justice Hoke in Tise v. Whitaker, 146 N.

Bess v. County of Cumberland

724 S.E.2d 920 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 12, 2012

BESS v. COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND, Board of Commissioners, North Carolina and James Martin, James Lawson, Tomas Lloyd, Richard Heicksen, individually. No. 85A12. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 12, 2012. Phyllis P.