Case law

State v. Brown

297 N.C. 302 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 1979

State v. Brown

292 N.C. 731 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1977

Brown v. Smith

286 N.C. 211 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1974

State v. Brown

299 N.C. 123 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 8, 1980

State v. Brown

284 N.C. 617 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1974

Gordon v. Brown

39 N.C. 399 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1846

McKee v. Houston. 3 Murp. 429. Still less can a sale to raise a fund for the payment of legacies defeat a bona fide voluntary conveyance to or for a grand-son. … The substance is, that upon the death of that lady, the defendant became the trustee of the slaves for the plaintiff, subject to the incumbrance of Thomas Brown’s debt.

State v. Brown

1 N.C. 54 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1864

Brown v. . Harding

172 N.C. 835 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 4, 1916

BROWN, J., not sitting. … BROWN, J., not sitting.

State v. . Brown

53 N.C. 443 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1862

Brown v. . Godsey

55 N.C. 417 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1856

See Gentrey v. Harper, ante, 177, and the cases there cited. The positive denial of the defendants makes it necessary that the plaintiff should produce something more than the testimony of a single witness.

Lea v. . Brown

58 N.C. 379 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1860

It differs from the case of White v. Cline, 7 Jones’ Rep. 174, in two important particulars: In that case, the dome earned the money in the State of California. … because they are not allowed the same degree of freedom and privilege, and should such a thing often occur, it would give rise to a kind of trust, of which the courts of Equity cannot take notice and enforce; see Barker v.

Brown v. . Lutterloh

1 N.C. 556 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1802

The jury were, in fact, sworn to try the title of Joseph Brown, and not whether Joseph Brown made the lease to John Doe stated in the declaration, and whether he entered, etc., and Richard Roe ousted him, etc.; consequently … So, in Adams v. Goose , Cro.

Coltraine v. Brown

71 N.C. 19 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1874

There was not only a direct conflict of testimony between Dempsey Brown and Brazier on the one side,, and the witnesses for the propounders on the other, as to the mental capacity of the testatrix, Jane Brown \ but Frazier … As the question involved in this case is discussed and decided in Isler v. Dewey, at .this term, we content ourselves with a reference to the opinion in that case. Let it be certified that there is error. Per Cujriam.

State v. Brown

293 N.C. 590 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 11, 1977

Cline v. Brown

286 N.C. 412 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1975

State v. Brown

284 N.C. 255 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1973

Brown v. Brady

1 N.C. 89 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1812

Russ v. Brown

113 N.C. 227 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 15, 1893

State v. Brown

67 N.C. 435 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1872

Butner v. . Brown

182 N.C. 692 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 21, 1921