Case law

State v. Brown

252 N.C. 366 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 13, 1960

Brown v. Moore

243 N.C. 78 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 2, 1955

State v. Brown

248 N.C. 314 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 30, 1958

Therefore, on authority of S. v. Brown, ante, 311, and for the reasons stated therein, a venire de novo is ordered.

Garrow v. Brown

1 N.C. 46 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1864

least, exceedingly uncertain and fluctuating, He was advised by friends, upon whose counsel he liad icretoibre relied, not to make the bargain without further iformation ; and it was then understood and agreed, the efendant Brown … being present, that no farther action houkl bo taken ir, the’matter until the information needed _as obtained. ’■ ^ After this arrangement, the friends of Whitaker left the ouse, and thereupon, Brown, having remained, renewed

Honeycutt v. Brown

191 N.C. 829 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 19, 1926

Brown v. Harding

172 N.C. 835 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 4, 1916

Purvis v. Brown.

39 N.C. 413 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1846

The bill, then alleges, that William Purvis, their father,-borrowed of the defendant Brown $100, and to secure' the payment thereof, the negro Travis was mortgaged to the defendant by William Purvis, and that the plaintiff

Brown v. . Beard

6 N.C. 125 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1812

TaxloR, Chief-Justice, delivered the opinion of the Cburt: The widow could convey only a life estate in the land she sold to Brown, because she and the other executor had previously executed.

Coltraine v. . Brown

71 N.C. 19 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1874

Frazier at Trinity College to board and attend school, and the testatrix came back to Dempsey Brown's, where she staid a few weeks and then went on a visit to said Frazier's house, where Joe C. … Brown was boarding as aforesaid, and there she remained for thirty-three days. Frazier stated that soon after coming to his house the old lady, (the alleged testatrix) then about eighty years of age, and Joe C.

Russ v. . Brown

113 N.C. 227 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1893

When the defendant Brown was on the stand in his own (228) behalf, the defendant's counsel, with a view to corroborating Mr. … Brown in his testimony that the services of the plaintiff for the first three months were not satisfactory to him as justifying the defendant in agreeing to the increased wages claimed by the plaintiff, asked the witness

State v. Brown

312 N.C. 86 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 2, 1984

State v. Brown

310 N.C. 155 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 10, 1984

Hampton v. . Brown

35 N.C. 18 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1851

The reason why the sheriff has the action, is, that the debtor is discharged and the sheriff becomes liable to the value of ihe goods, and therefore the law vests the property in him; Wilbraham v Snow, 2 Saund. 47.

Brown v. Fulford

308 N.C. 543 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 31, 1983

State v. Brown

301 N.C. 236 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 7, 1980

State v. Brown

297 N.C. 302 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 1979

State v. Brown

292 N.C. 731 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1977

Brown v. Smith

286 N.C. 211 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1974

State v. Brown

284 N.C. 617 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1974

Gordon v. Brown

39 N.C. 399 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1846

McKee v. Houston. 3 Murp. 429. Still less can a sale to raise a fund for the payment of legacies defeat a bona fide voluntary conveyance to or for a grand-son. … The substance is, that upon the death of that lady, the defendant became the trustee of the slaves for the plaintiff, subject to the incumbrance of Thomas Brown’s debt.