Case law

State v. . Brown

100 N.C. 519 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1888

Bost v. Bost , 87 N.C. 477 ; Perry v. Jackson , 88 N.C. 103 ; Malloy v. Bruden , 86 N.C. 251 . … Cited: S. v. Hinson , 103 N.C. 378 ; S. v. Grigg , 104 N.C. 885 ; Osborne v. Wilkes , 108 N.C. 665 ; Posey v. Patton , 109 N.C. 458 ; S. v. Malloy , 115 N.C. 739 ; S. v. Hewlin , 128 N.C. 572 ; S. v.

State v. Brown

355 N.C. 495 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 9, 2002

State v. Brown

354 N.C. 576 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 2001

Brown v. . Smathers

188 N.C. 166 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 10, 1924

Strother v. Cathey, 5 N. C., 162 ; Eu-che-lah v. Welsh, 10 N. C., 155 ; Danforth v. Wear, 9 Wheaton, 673 ; 6 Law Ed., 188; Fletcher v. Peck, supra, p. 143; Brown v. Brown, 103 N. C., 222, 223 ; S. c., 106 N. … Lattimer v. Poteet, 14 Peters, 4, 14 ; 10 Law Ed., 328, 333. The purpose and effect of the act of 1794, supra, have been pointed out in previous decisions. It was not referred to in Brown v. Brown, 103 N. C., 213 .

Sharpe v. . Brown

177 N.C. 294 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 9, 1919

In Sanders v. Hyatt, 8 N. … In Ross v. Toms, 15 N.

State v. Brown

353 N.C. 384 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 1, 2001

State v. Brown

353 N.C. 384 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 1, 2001

Brown v. Railroad

140 N.C. 154 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1905

Brown, J. … This was done in order that they might be taxed in the event the plaintiff was cast under the ruling in Loftis v. Baxter, 66 N. C., 340 , and Henderson v. Williams, 120 N. C., 341 .

State v. Brown

353 N.C. 383 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 1, 2001

State v. Brown

351 N.C. 643 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 4, 2000

Barrett v. . Brown

86 N.C. 556 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1882

Oates v. Lilly, 84 N. C., 643 ; Wordsworth v. Davis, 75 N. C., 159 . … Fich v. Workman, 9 Met., 517 , and Rush v. Good, 14 Serg. and R., 226. And so she might, too, if as was the case in Hoover v. Berryhill, 84 N.

Carrington v. Brown

352 N.C. 147 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 2000

Newton v. . Brown

134 N.C. 439 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 22, 1904

Brown, Jr.; another entry being made by H. A. Brown, Jr., and the third by defendant A. W. Taylor. They allege that in respect to the first entry the defendant H. A. … Ruffin, J. , in S. v. Bevers, supra , says that they were subject to entry, but that by the act of 1872 they were ceded to the board of education.

Robins v. Town of Hillsborough

361 N.C. 193 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 26, 2007

Robins v. Town of Hillsborough, 176 N.C. App. 1, 7 , 625 S.E.2d 813, 817 (2006). … Summey v.

State v. Brown

350 N.C. 838 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 22, 1999

Brown v. . Lipe

210 N.C. 199 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1936

Ward v. R. R., 161 N. C., 179 ; Corner v. Winston-Salem, 178 N. C., 383 . … Lumber Co. v. Branch, 158 N. C., 251 ; Huffman v. Ingold, 181 N. C., 426 ; Whedbee v. Ruffin, 191 N. C., 257 .

Wilson v. . Brown

134 N.C. 400 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1904

Brown, in which a sale under two executions issued from the Superior Court of Greene County, upon judgments in favor of G. C. Edwards and wife v. B. F. Wilson, Julia C. Dixon, Executrix, v. B. F. Wilson is recited. … In Cobb v .

Doyle v. . Brown, Guardian

72 N.C. 393 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1875

State v. Brown

319 N.C. 361 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1987

The defendant Brown contends that the trial court erred by admitting testimony that Gilliam and Battle already had been convicted of the same crimes charged against him. See State v. … See Kirby v. United States, 174 U.S. 47, 55 , 43 L.Ed. 890 , 893-94 *365 (1899); State v. Kerley, 246 N.C. 157, 159 , 97 S.E. 2d 876, 878 (1957). State v. Duncan, 28 N.C. 98 (1846) and State v.

Garrow v. Brown

60 N.C. 46 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1864

exceedingly uncertain and .fluctuating, lie was advised bv friends, upon whose counsel- he ball theretofore relied, not to make the ba-gain. without further in formation: and it was then understood and agreed, the defendant Brown … After this arrangement, the friends of 'Whitaker left the house, and thereupon, Brown, having remained, renewed the negotiation anu effected the alleged sale of his land.