Case law

Brown v. . Brown

42 N.C. 30 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1850

The will of James Brown contains the following clause : “'I will and bequeath to my three sons, James L. Brown, Alexander Brown, and William M. … been finished in a workmanlike manner, and made comfortable, have been the sort of house that was intended by the testator ; but it was left unfinished and the work put on it was not at all suitable ; it is not weather boarded

Brown v. Brown

315 N.C. 389 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 7, 1986

Brown v. Brown.

101 N.C. 679 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1888

Brown v. Brown

307 N.C. 696 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 8, 1983

Brown v. . Brown

27 N.C. 136 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1844

In Ford v. Whidbee, 1 Dev. & Bat. … In the next session after the decision of Ford v.

In re D.S.

364 N.C. 184 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 17, 2010

Shelton v. Morehead Mem’l Hosp., 318 N.C. 76, 81-82 , 347 S.E.2d 824, 828 (1986) (citations omitted). Questions of statutory interpretation are questions of law and are reviewed de novo. E.g., Brown v.

Brown v. Meter

364 N.C. 128 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 14, 2010

BROWN and Pamela Brown, Co-Administrators of the Estate of Julian David Brown, and Karen M. Helms, Administratrix of the Estate of Matthew M. Helms v. Eric R. … Brown, et al. Ronald C. Dilthey, Raleigh, for NCYSL. Dan J. McLamb, Raleigh, for Eric R. Meter. Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 681 S.E.2d 382 .

State v. Brown

724 S.E.2d 910 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 12, 2012

724 S.E.2d 910 (2012) STATE of North Carolina v. Brandon Jason BROWN. No. 7P12. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 12, 2012. William B. Gibson, Winston-Salem, for Brown, Brandon Jason. Jess D.

State v. Brown

721 S.E.2d 227 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 26, 2012

721 S.E.2d 227 (2012) STATE of North Carolina v. Gregory Mark BROWN. No. 555P11. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 26, 2012. Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina. … Blau, for Brown, Gregory Mark. Roxann Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

State v. Brown

365 N.C. 337 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 25, 2011

717 S.E.2d 371 (2011) STATE of North Carolina v. Henry Eugene BROWN. No. 218A11. Supreme Court of North Carolina. August 25, 2011. Kristen L. Todd, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Brown, Henry Eugene.

Brown v. Ellis

365 N.C. 209 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 2011

709 S.E.2d 928 (2011) William Lawson BROWN, III v. Mark P. ELLIS. No. 389P07-2. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 15, 2011. Lee M. Cecil, High Point, for Brown, William Lawson (III). T. … Edward Greene, Raleigh, for Brown, William Lawson (III).

Cunningham v. . Sprinkle

124 N.C. 638 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 9, 1899

Upon the authority of the cases of State Prison v. Pay and Cherry v. … The second objection is well answered in Trustees of University v. McIver, 72 N.

State v. Brown

365 N.C. 189 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 2011

706 S.E.2d 780 (2011) STATE of North Carolina v. Glorbman Lamont BROWN. No. 97P11. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 7, 2011. Angenette R. Stephenson, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina. … Glorbman Lamont Brown, for Brown, Glorbman Lamont. William D. Kenerly, District Attorney, for State.

State v. Brown

363 N.C. 584 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 27, 2009

682 S.E.2d 704 (2009) STATE of North Carolina v. Artemus Shamont BROWN. No. 282P09. Supreme Court of North Carolina. August 27, 2009. Artemus Shamont Brown, Pro Se. V. Lori Fuller, Assistant Attorney General, for State.

Brown v. Flowe

349 N.C. 520 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 31, 1998

Brown v. Flowe, 128 N.C. App. 668, 674 , 496 S.E.2d 830, 834 (1998). On 8 July 1998 this Court allowed plaintiff’s petition for discretionary review. … See Board of Adjust. v. Town of Swansboro, 334 N.C. 421, 427 , 432 S.E.2d 310, 313 (1993). Our task is to give effect, if possible, to all sections of each statute and to harmonize them into one law on the subject.

Brown v. . Kinsey

81 N.C. 245 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1879

In the case of Hall v. … State v. Waller, 80 N. C., 401; State v. Patterson, 78 N. C., 470 ; Sutton v. Madre, 2 Jones, 320 ; Cobb v. Fogalman, 1 Ire., 440.

State v. Brown

310 N.C. 563 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 3, 1984

In State v. Childers, 41 N.C. … State v.

State v. Brown

233 N.C. 202 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 2, 1951

returns of the preceding year but also “a list of names of persons who do not appear upon the tax lists, who are residents of the county and over twenty-one years of age,” to be prepared in each county by the Clerk of the Board … Speller, 230 N.C. 345 , 53 S.E. 2d 294 ; S. v. Brown, 231 N.C. 152 , 56 S.E. 2d 441 . After a preliminary investigation, pursuant to the procedure outlined in S. v.

Board of Health v. Board of Commissioners

220 N.C. 140 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 8, 1941

Presumably, both boards have acted under legislative authority. Board of Education v. Kenan, 112 N. C., 566 , 17 S. E., 485 . … E., 3 ; Kistler v. R. R., 164 N. C., 365 , 79 S. E., 676 ; Parker v. Bank, 152 N. C., 253 , 67 S. E., 492 ; Millikan v. Fox, 84 N. C., 107 ; Blake v. Askew, 76 N. C., 325 ; McKethan v. Ray, 71 N. C., 165 ; Bates v.

Brown v. . Turner

70 N.C. 93 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1874

A judgment in mandamus , does not decide the title, for if the plaintiff obtained judgment against Howerton, it would not estop Turner from bringing his action against the plaintiff, Brown. … *Page 95 The right sought to be tried, is not one between Brown and Howerton, but between Turner and Brown, yet the mandamus is against Howerton, a third party, who has no interest in the controversy, except to know who is