Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

1.49s

  • Brown v. Ellis

    672 S.E.2d 24 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 6, 2009

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    320 N.C. 634 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 3, 1987

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Moore

    229 N.C. 406 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1948

    Jordan , 205 N.C. 618 , 172 S.E. 319 ; Copney v. Parks , 212 N.C. 217 , 193 S.E. 21 ; and that, hence, the motion for judgment on the pleadings must be considered in the light of the common law. … See Williams v. Mfg. Co. , 153 N.C. 7 , 69 S.E. 902 , and Tarpley v. Arnold , 226 N.C. 679 , 40 S.E.2d 33 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    673 S.E.2d 662 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 2009

    673 S.E.2d 662 (2009) STATE of North Carolina v. Tashaun BROWN. No. 537P08. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 5, 2009. Tashaun Brown, Pro Se. Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Philip E.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bernhardt v. . Brown

    122 N.C. 587 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1898

    King v. Wells , 94 N.C. 344 ; Melvin v. … Bernhardt v. Brown , 118 N.C. 700 . The very able brief of the defendants' counsel concedes that The Code, secs. 433-436, inclusive, require docketing "in order to secure a lien for that purpose alone."

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Ellis

    672 S.E.2d 546 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 28, 2009

    BROWN v. Mark P. ELLIS. No. 389PA07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 28, 2009. K. Edward Greene, Tobias S. Hampson, Raleigh, Lee M. Cecil, High Point, for Brown. T. Keith Black, Greensboro, for Ellis.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Ellis

    672 S.E.2d 24 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 6, 2009

    BROWN v. Mark P. ELLIS. No. 389PA07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 6, 2009. Tobias S. Hampson, Raleigh, Lee M. Cecil, High Point, for Brown. T. Keith Black, William F. Patterson, Jr., Greensboro, for Ellis.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hines v. Brown

    254 N.C. 447 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 12, 1961

    Bradham v. Trucking Co., 243 N.C. 708 , 91 S.E. 2d 891 ; Badders v. Lassiter, 240, N.C. 413, 82 S.E. 2d 357 ; Hinshaw v. Pepper, 210 N.C. 573 , 187 S.E. 786 . … Carrigan v. Dover, 251 N.C. 97, 110 S.E. 2d 825 . In fixing driver responsibility, Chief Justice Winborne, in Clontz v. Krimminger, 253 N.C. 252 , 116 S.E. 2d 804 , Justice Parker, in Carrigan v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Southerland v. . Brown

    176 N.C. 187 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 9, 1918

    Farmer v. Willard, 75 N. C., 401 ; Threadgill v. Commissioners, 116 N. C., 616 ; S. v. Carlton, 107 N. C., 956 , and cases cited. We will consider plaintiff’s second exception, as to costs, hereafter. … This is not like the case of Huntsman v. Lumber Co., 122 N. C., 583 . As to the costs. The court divided all costs, except those in the claim and delivery proceeding, between the parties.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Simpson v. . Brown

    117 N.C. 482 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1895

    Kivett v. Wynne, 89 N. C., 39 . The numerous decisions upon inexcusable negligence under this section are found in Glarh's Code, pp, 231, 232, 233, 234. Affirmed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Long

    36 N.C. 190 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1840

    It appears, upon the pleadings, that the plaintiff, Brown, gave to the plaintiff, Campbell, his bond with surety for the amount of the debt of Long, one of the defendants, to Campbell, for which Brown was Long’s surety; and … that thereupon Campbell assigned the judgment at law to the plaintiff Cowan, in trust for Brown.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Lewis

    197 N.C. 704 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 13, 1929

    Holt v. Holt, 114 N. C., 241 ; Jones v. Richmond, 161 N. C., 553 . In Griffin v. Commander, 163 N. … Maclin v. Smith, 37 N. C., 376 ; Wells v. Williams, 187 N. C., 134 ; Roane v. Robinson, 189 N. C., at p. 631 . See Cagle v. Hampton, 196 N. C., 470 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Ellis

    362 N.C. 679 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 2008

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hodges

    230 N.C. 746 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 19, 1949

    See Roberts v. Sawyer, 229 N.C. 279 , 49 S.E.2d 468 , and cases cited. … See Cornelison v. Hammond, 225 N.C. 535 , 35 S.E.2d 633 , where the subject has been recently fully discussed and applied in opinion by Barnhill, J.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Cowper

    247 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1957

    G.S. 33-32; Scull v. Jernigan, 22 N.C. 144 ; Gillespie v. Foy, 40 N.C. 280 ; March v. Berrier, 41 N.C. 524 ; Dudley v. Winfield, 45 N.C. 91 ; Jones v. Edwards, 53 N.C. 336 ; Bateman v. Latham, 56 N.C. 35 ; Wood v. … Allison v. Robinson, 78 N.C. 222 ; McLean v. Leitch, 152 N.C. 266 , 67 S.E. 490 ; Brown v. Wilson, 174 N.C. 636 , 94 S.E. 416 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ury v. Brown.

    129 N.C. 270 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 26, 1901

    Roseman v. Roseman, 127 N. C., 494 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Ray

    32 N.C. 72 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1849

    Coggs v. Barnard, 2 Ray 909, 919. Lord Holt says. “The owner’s trusting him with the goods is a consideration.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . McLean

    217 N.C. 555 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 8, 1940

    Creecy v. Pearce, 69 N. C., 67 ; Caroon v. Cooper, 63 N. C., 387 ; Smith v. Gilmer, 64 N. C., 546 ; Chemical Co. v. Walston, supra. … Purvis v. Carstaphan, 73 N. C., 575 ; Gwathmey v. Pearce, 74 N. C., 398 ; Trust Co. v. Benbow, 135 N. C., 303 ; Gore v. Townsend, 105 N. C., 232 ; Chemical Co. v. Walston, supra.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Swann v. . Brown

    51 N.C. 150 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1858

    King, 3 Jones’ Rep. 45; Heathcock v. Pennington, 11 Ire. Rep. 640; Couch v. Jones, 5 Jones’ Rep. 402. … PeR Cueiam, v Judgment reversed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Blue v. . Brown

    178 N.C. 334 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 22, 1919

    Brown claims red A to be the beginning corner; I don’t understand the map. Mr. Smith’s fence was directly on the line when Mr. Brown bought the land. That is where the surveyors run. … I do not know when the Browns began to claim that black E was not the right corner.” W. A. Smith: I know the land in dispute in this action. I owned the land at one time claimed, by the Browns.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.