Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.49s
229 N.C. 406 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1948
Jordan , 205 N.C. 618 , 172 S.E. 319 ; Copney v. Parks , 212 N.C. 217 , 193 S.E. 21 ; and that, hence, the motion for judgment on the pleadings must be considered in the light of the common law. … See Williams v. Mfg. Co. , 153 N.C. 7 , 69 S.E. 902 , and Tarpley v. Arnold , 226 N.C. 679 , 40 S.E.2d 33 .
Cited 4 timesPublished673 S.E.2d 662 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 2009
673 S.E.2d 662 (2009) STATE of North Carolina v. Tashaun BROWN. No. 537P08. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 5, 2009. Tashaun Brown, Pro Se. Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Philip E.
Cited 0 timesPublished122 N.C. 587 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1898
King v. Wells , 94 N.C. 344 ; Melvin v. … Bernhardt v. Brown , 118 N.C. 700 . The very able brief of the defendants' counsel concedes that The Code, secs. 433-436, inclusive, require docketing "in order to secure a lien for that purpose alone."
Cited 5 timesPublished672 S.E.2d 546 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 28, 2009
BROWN v. Mark P. ELLIS. No. 389PA07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 28, 2009. K. Edward Greene, Tobias S. Hampson, Raleigh, Lee M. Cecil, High Point, for Brown. T. Keith Black, Greensboro, for Ellis.
Cited 0 timesPublished672 S.E.2d 24 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 6, 2009
BROWN v. Mark P. ELLIS. No. 389PA07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 6, 2009. Tobias S. Hampson, Raleigh, Lee M. Cecil, High Point, for Brown. T. Keith Black, William F. Patterson, Jr., Greensboro, for Ellis.
Cited 0 timesPublished254 N.C. 447 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 12, 1961
Bradham v. Trucking Co., 243 N.C. 708 , 91 S.E. 2d 891 ; Badders v. Lassiter, 240, N.C. 413, 82 S.E. 2d 357 ; Hinshaw v. Pepper, 210 N.C. 573 , 187 S.E. 786 . … Carrigan v. Dover, 251 N.C. 97, 110 S.E. 2d 825 . In fixing driver responsibility, Chief Justice Winborne, in Clontz v. Krimminger, 253 N.C. 252 , 116 S.E. 2d 804 , Justice Parker, in Carrigan v.
Cited 4 timesPublished176 N.C. 187 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 9, 1918
Farmer v. Willard, 75 N. C., 401 ; Threadgill v. Commissioners, 116 N. C., 616 ; S. v. Carlton, 107 N. C., 956 , and cases cited. We will consider plaintiff’s second exception, as to costs, hereafter. … This is not like the case of Huntsman v. Lumber Co., 122 N. C., 583 . As to the costs. The court divided all costs, except those in the claim and delivery proceeding, between the parties.
Cited 5 timesPublished117 N.C. 482 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1895
Kivett v. Wynne, 89 N. C., 39 . The numerous decisions upon inexcusable negligence under this section are found in Glarh's Code, pp, 231, 232, 233, 234. Affirmed.
Cited 3 timesPublished36 N.C. 190 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1840
It appears, upon the pleadings, that the plaintiff, Brown, gave to the plaintiff, Campbell, his bond with surety for the amount of the debt of Long, one of the defendants, to Campbell, for which Brown was Long’s surety; and … that thereupon Campbell assigned the judgment at law to the plaintiff Cowan, in trust for Brown.
Cited 5 timesPublished197 N.C. 704 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 13, 1929
Holt v. Holt, 114 N. C., 241 ; Jones v. Richmond, 161 N. C., 553 . In Griffin v. Commander, 163 N. … Maclin v. Smith, 37 N. C., 376 ; Wells v. Williams, 187 N. C., 134 ; Roane v. Robinson, 189 N. C., at p. 631 . See Cagle v. Hampton, 196 N. C., 470 .
Cited 6 timesPublished230 N.C. 746 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 19, 1949
See Roberts v. Sawyer, 229 N.C. 279 , 49 S.E.2d 468 , and cases cited. … See Cornelison v. Hammond, 225 N.C. 535 , 35 S.E.2d 633 , where the subject has been recently fully discussed and applied in opinion by Barnhill, J.
Cited 4 timesPublished247 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1957
G.S. 33-32; Scull v. Jernigan, 22 N.C. 144 ; Gillespie v. Foy, 40 N.C. 280 ; March v. Berrier, 41 N.C. 524 ; Dudley v. Winfield, 45 N.C. 91 ; Jones v. Edwards, 53 N.C. 336 ; Bateman v. Latham, 56 N.C. 35 ; Wood v. … Allison v. Robinson, 78 N.C. 222 ; McLean v. Leitch, 152 N.C. 266 , 67 S.E. 490 ; Brown v. Wilson, 174 N.C. 636 , 94 S.E. 416 .
Cited 4 timesPublished129 N.C. 270 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 26, 1901
Roseman v. Roseman, 127 N. C., 494 .
Cited 3 timesPublished32 N.C. 72 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1849
Coggs v. Barnard, 2 Ray 909, 919. Lord Holt says. “The owner’s trusting him with the goods is a consideration.
Cited 4 timesPublished217 N.C. 555 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 8, 1940
Creecy v. Pearce, 69 N. C., 67 ; Caroon v. Cooper, 63 N. C., 387 ; Smith v. Gilmer, 64 N. C., 546 ; Chemical Co. v. Walston, supra. … Purvis v. Carstaphan, 73 N. C., 575 ; Gwathmey v. Pearce, 74 N. C., 398 ; Trust Co. v. Benbow, 135 N. C., 303 ; Gore v. Townsend, 105 N. C., 232 ; Chemical Co. v. Walston, supra.
Cited 5 timesPublished51 N.C. 150 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1858
King, 3 Jones’ Rep. 45; Heathcock v. Pennington, 11 Ire. Rep. 640; Couch v. Jones, 5 Jones’ Rep. 402. … PeR Cueiam, v Judgment reversed.
Cited 2 timesPublished178 N.C. 334 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 22, 1919
Brown claims red A to be the beginning corner; I don’t understand the map. Mr. Smith’s fence was directly on the line when Mr. Brown bought the land. That is where the surveyors run. … I do not know when the Browns began to claim that black E was not the right corner.” W. A. Smith: I know the land in dispute in this action. I owned the land at one time claimed, by the Browns.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna