Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

1.93s

  • State v. Brown

    365 N.C. 465 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 9, 2012

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    320 N.C. 172 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1987

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State v. . Brown

    150 N.C. 867 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 21, 1909

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Costen

    176 N.C. 63 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 18, 1918

    Britt v. Canvassing Board , 172 N.C. 797 ; In re Sawyer , 124 U.S. 200 ; Hunt v. Hoffman , 125 Minn. 249 ; U.S. Voting Machine Co. v. Hobson , 132 Iowa 38 ; Shoemaker v. City of Des Moines , 129 Iowa 244 ; Walls v. … Brundidge , 109 Ark. 250 ; Fletcher v. Tuttle , 151 Ill. 41 ; City of Dallas v. Street Ry. , 105 Tex. 337 [ 105 Tex. 337 ]; Greene v. Mills , 69 Fed., 852 . As said by Associate Justice Phillips in City of Dallas v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. . Brown

    159 N.C. 467 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 1912

    C., 738 ; S. v. Baskerville, 141 N. C., 811 ; S. v. Jones, 145 N. C., 460 ), but also for counties (S. v. Shine, 149 N. C., 480 ). … S. v. Doster, 157 N.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Fulp v. . Brown

    153 N.C. 531 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 7, 1910

    Lumber Co. v. Parker, at the present term; Bruton Ex. v. McRae, 125 N. C., p. 207; Bank v. Green, 78 N. C., 247 ; Lambert v. Kinnery, 74 N. C., p. 348. … In the cases to which we were especially referred, Watson v. Christian and Same v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Norment v. . Brown

    79 N.C. 363 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1878

    Hall v. Craige, 65 N. C., 51 ; Walkup v. Houston, 65, N. C. 501; Mercer v. Wiggins, 74 N. C., 48 ; Bervy v. Ballows, 30, Ark. 198. … In Earp v. Richardson, 75 N.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Shuford v. Brown

    201 N.C. 17 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1931

    R. v. Hegwood, 198 N. … R. v. Hegwood, supra. For some other authorities, see Kello v. Maget, 18 N. C., 414 ; Sloan v. McDowell, 75 N. C., 29 ; Ball-Thrash Co. v. McCormick, 162 N. C., 471 ; Mercer v. Lumber Co., 173 N. C., 49 ; Lumber Co. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hoover

    77 N.C. 40 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1877

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mangum v. . Brown

    200 N.C. 296 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 27, 1931

    Clary v. Clary, 24 N. C., 78 ; Bost v. Bost, 87 N. C., 477 ; Horah v. Knox, ibid., 483; Beard v. R. R., 143 N. C., 136 ; Rakestraw v. Pratt, 160 N. C., 436 . … Cromwell v. Logan, 196 N. C., 588 ; Inge v. R. R., 192 N. C., 522 ; Lindsey v. Suncrest Lumber Co., 189 N. C., 118 ; Standard Oil Co. v. Hunt, 187 N. C., 157 ; Gates v. Max, 125 N. C., 139 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Ward

    103 N.C. 173 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1889

    owner, William Borden, Sr., to another son of the donor, bearing his name, and conveying, by gift,, other lands, with essentially similar limitations as that now before us, came before this Court for determination in Borden v. … In the same direction are our own adjudication s—Sigmon v. Hawn, 87 N. C., 450 ; Isler v. Isler, 88 N. C., 576 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    339 N.C. 606 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 10, 1995

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Armstrong v. Brown

    687 S.E.2d 480 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 13, 2009

    ARMSTRONG v. Superior Court Trial Judge Frank R. BROWN. No. 490P06-5. Supreme Court of North Carolina. July 13, 2009. Arthur O. Armstrong, pro se. Franklin R. Brown, Senior Resident Judge, pro se.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. . Brown

    67 N.C. 470 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1872

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Ellis

    672 S.E.2d 24 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 6, 2009

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Toms v. . Brown

    213 N.C. 295 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 23, 1938

    Baker v. Edge, 174 N. C., 100 . A will and codicil are to be construed together so that the intention of the testator can be ascertained from both. Brown v. Brown, 195 N. … Wells v. Williams, 187 N. C., 134 . The codicil does not revoke this, but the sale to pay the $1,000 to the church is a supplemental bequest and that the payment be in cash.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    320 N.C. 634 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 3, 1987

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hines v. Brown

    254 N.C. 447 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 12, 1961

    Bradham v. Trucking Co., 243 N.C. 708 , 91 S.E. 2d 891 ; Badders v. Lassiter, 240, N.C. 413, 82 S.E. 2d 357 ; Hinshaw v. Pepper, 210 N.C. 573 , 187 S.E. 786 . … Carrigan v. Dover, 251 N.C. 97, 110 S.E. 2d 825 . In fixing driver responsibility, Chief Justice Winborne, in Clontz v. Krimminger, 253 N.C. 252 , 116 S.E. 2d 804 , Justice Parker, in Carrigan v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. . Brown

    202 N.C. 221 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 27, 1932

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Glass

    229 N.C. 657 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1948

    The land joins the land of Brown, Jr.' … Warlick v. Lowman , 103 N.C. 122 , 9 S.E. 458 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.