Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

1.37s

  • State v. Brown

    242 N.C. 602 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1955

    Allen v. Ins. Co., 211 N.C. 736 , 190 S.E. 735 . Affirmed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cashatt v. . Brown

    211 N.C. 367 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 17, 1937

    In Stone v. R. R.; 197 N. … Tbe case of Stone v. R.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Wilson

    174 N.C. 636 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 28, 1917

    Goodman v. Goodman, 72 N. C., 508 ; Merrill v. Merrill, 92 N. C., 665. … C., 143 ; Smith v. McCrary, 38 N. C., 204 ; Brothers v. Cartwright, 55 N. C., 113 ; Conly v. Kincaid, 60 N. C., 594 ; Adams Eq., 136.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    365 N.C. 197 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 2011

    709 S.E.2d 925 (2011) STATE v. Alexander Robert BROWN. No. 71P11-1. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 15, 2011. Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Southern Pines, for Brown, Alexander Robert. Charles E.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Morisey

    126 N.C. 772 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1900

    In addition to those, we refer to Pinner v. Pinner , 44 N.C. 475 , Frost v. Etheridge , 12 N.C. 30 . These fully recognize the principle of this opinion, with some excellent reasoning by Taylor, C.J . … Overruled: (And adopting, in effect, the dissenting opinions), Brown v. Morisey , 128 N.C. 138 . (775)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Ellis

    709 S.E.2d 929 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 27, 2011

    709 S.E.2d 929 (2011) BROWN v. ELLIS. No. 389P07-2. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 27, 2011. Lee M. Cecil, High Point, for Brown, William Lawson (III). T. Keith Black, Greensboro, for Ellis, Mark P. K. … Edward Greene, Raleigh, for Brown, William Lawson (III).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    710 S.E.2d 42 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 2011

    710 S.E.2d 42 (2011) STATE of North Carolina. v. Alexander Robert BROWN. No. 71P11. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 15, 2011. Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Southern Pines, for Brown, Alexander Robert. Charles E.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    325 N.C. 427 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1989

    State v. Hacks, 323 N.C. 574, 577, 579 , 374 S.E.2d 240, 242, 244 (1988). The failure to appoint additional counsel “violate[s] the mandate of N.C.G.S. § 7A-450(bl) and [is] prejudicial error per se.” … Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506, 515 , 8 L.Ed.2d 70, 77 (1962); State v. Moses, 16 N.C. App. 174 , 191 S.E.2d 368 (1972).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Kellam v. . Brown

    112 N.C. 451 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1893

    Plaintiffs introduced evidence tending to show that Faulkner, Kellam Moore had delivered certain goods to defendant, Isaac Brown, under the following contract: This agreement, made and entered into this 5 June, 1891, by and … Witness: ISSAC BROWN. Please send copy of this with goods.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Warren v. . Brown

    64 N.C. 381 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1870

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hurley

    243 N.C. 138 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 23, 1955

    Timber Co. v. Yarbrough, 179 N.C. 335 , 102 S.E. 630 ; Peel v. Calais, 224 N.C. 421 , 31 S.E. 2d 440 ; Williams v. Robertson, 235 N.C. 478 , 70 S.E. 2d 692 ; Self Help Corp. v. Brinkley, 215 N.C. 615 , 2 S.E. 2d 889 . … Loftin v. Cobb, 46 N.C. 406 ; Locklear v. Savage, 159 N.C. 236 , 74 S.E. 347 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bernhardt v. . Brown

    119 N.C. 506 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1896

    Corp., Section 7799 ; Sprague v. R. Co., 5 R. I., 233; 1 Thomp. Corp., Sections 47, 320, 688, 689; 6 Thomp. … Corp., Sections 7452, 7472, 7817, 8012, 8020, 8128, and cases cited in those sections; Murfree Foreign Corp., Sections 453, 459, 460 ; Young v. South Tredeger Co., 4 Am. St. Rep., 752 ; Drake Attachments, Section 479.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Graves.

    11 N.C. 342 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1826

    If the object had been to give Brown a preference, and that object bad been fairly, and with good faith effected, the law would not'have annulled it. … I believe no where can be found a more lucid and satisfactory opinion upon the subject than the one given by Chief-Justice Spencer of New-York, in the case of Bogert v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Morris

    20 N.C. 565 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1838

    Young v. … R. , 96 N.C. 411 ; McKinnon v. Morrison , 104 N.C. 363 ; Goodson v. Mullen , 92 N.C. 212 ; Emry v. R. R. , 109 N.C. 602 ; Edwards v. Phifer , 120 N.C. 406 ; Benton v. R. R. , 122 N.C. 1010 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . House

    116 N.C. 859 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1895

    Mizzell v. Simmons , 79 N.C. 182 . … Cox v. Cox , 91 N.C. 256 . We do not think this south boundary (867) of the Blount grant doubtful.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    272 N.C. 512 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 12, 1968

    Brown had told Oglesby that the shirt in evidence was a shirt owned or worn by defendant was incompetent. … However, further factual investigation as to defendant’s guilt is a matter within the sphere and competence of the Board of Paroles. Each of defendant’s remaining assignments of error has been considered.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Morisey.

    128 N.C. 138 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 16, 1901

    The plaintiff is the widow of George Brown, who, she *139 alleges, was tibe owner of said land at the time of Ms death, which occurred during the late war beitwen the States. … Hunnycutt v. Brooks, 116 N. C., 788 . This case has been, here before, upon a judgment of non-suit and was affirmed. (See 124 N. C., 292 .) But this opinion was reversed on petition to rehear ( 126 N.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Becknall

    58 N.C. 423 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1860

    The ease is narrowed down to the claims of Clara Becknall and Uoah Brown. … In respect to Brown, we are of opinion that his right, under the mortgage is presumed to be abandoned from lapse of time.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Aydlett

    193 N.C. 832 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 23, 1927

    between tbe parties, and tbat no barm can result from continuing tbe restraining order to tbe bearing, while a contrary ruling might work serious injury to tbe plaintiffs, we are of opinion tbat under authority of Wentz v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    364 N.C. 621 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 2010

    705 S.E.2d 365 (2010) STATE of North Carolina v. Joe Nathan BROWN. No. 504P10. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 15, 2010. Karen A. Blum, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina. … Joe Nathan Brown, for Brown, Joe Nathan. Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.