Case law

State v. Brown

367 N.C. 225 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 27, 2013

Brown v. . Mitchell

168 N.C. 312 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1915

In Freeman v. … Mort., sec. 81; 6 Cyc., 1013; 5 Ruling Case Law, 420; McMurtie v. Riddell, 9 Col., 503 ; Louthain v. Miller, 85 Ind., 163 ; Close v. Hodges, 44 Minn., 205 ; Paine v. Benton, 32 Wis., 491 ; Collerd v. Tully, 78 N. J.

Brown v. Harding

171 N.C. 686 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 31, 1916

Brown, admr. of Richard Short, v. J. J. … Brown, has no other interest than as administrator of Mr.

Brown v. Costen

176 N.C. 63 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 18, 1918

Britt v. Canvassing Board, 172 N. C., 797 ; In re Sawyer, 124 U. S., 200 ; Hunt v. Hoffman, 125 Minn., 249 ; U. S. Voting Machine Co. v. Hobson, 132 Iowa, 38 ; Shoemaker v. City of Des Moines, 129 Iowa, 244 ; Walls v. … Brundidge, 109 Ark., 250; Fletcher v. Tuttle, 151 Ill., 41 ; City of Dallas v. Street Ry., 105 Texas, 337 ; Greene v. Mills, 69 Fed., 852 . As said by Associate Justice Phillips in City of Dallas v.

Brown v. Doby

242 N.C. 462 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 30, 1955

Simmons v. Simmons, 228 N.C. 233 , 45 S.E. 2d 124 ; Bethell v. Lee, 200 N.C. 755 , 158 S.E. 493 . See also McLean v. McLean, 233 N.C. 139 , 63 S.E. 2d 138 . … See Smith v. Smith, 226 N.C. 506 , 39 S.E. 2d 391 ; Hall v. *466 Coach Co., 224 N.C. 781 , 32 S.E. 2d 325 ; In re Sams, 236 N.C. 228 , 72 S.E. 2d 421 ; Vestal v. Vending Machine Exchange, 219 N.C. 468 , 14 S.E. 2d 427 .

State v. Brown

231 N.C. 152 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 23, 1949

S. v. Hammond, supra; S. v. Brooks, 225 N.C. 662 , 36 S.E. 2d 238 ; S. v. Wise, 225 N.C. 746 , 36 S.E. 2d 230 ; S. v. Grass, 223 N.C. 31 , 25 S.E. 2d 193 ; S. v. Smith, supra; S. v. McRae, 200 N.C. 149 , 156 S.E. 800 . … G.S. 14-17; S. v. Biggs, 224 N.C. 722 , 32 S.E. 2d 352 ; S. v. Smith, 223 N.C. 457 , 27 S.E. 2d 114 ; S. v. Williams, 216 N.C. 446 , 5 S.E. 2d 314 ; S. v. Alston, 215 N.C. 713 , 3 S.E. 2d 11 ; S. v.

State v. Brown

367 N.C. 214 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 27, 2013

Kellam v. Brown

112 N.C. 451 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1893

Keerans v. . Brown

68 N.C. 43 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1873

The complaint states that “ the plaintiffs are ready to prove that the last will and testament of Jane Brown, deceased, was duly signed, sealed, published and declared by the said Jane Brown, on 13th September, 1866; and … Redford v. Rice, 2 Dev. & Bat. 39 . The argument at this bar was, that the issue was as to-capacity at the time of signing the will, 13th September* 1866, and not as to her capacity a week before.

Brown v. . Hutchinson

155 N.C. 205 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 12, 1911

In this case the plaintiff had already introduced a grant from the State to Eli Brown, dated October, 1846, and duly registered. He could therefore have shown seven years' possession under color. Gilchrist v. … The deeds from Eli Brown to Absher in 1855 and of Absher to Elijah Brown in 1859, and the deed from the latter's executors in 1862, recorded in 1885, were competent to show color of title. In Janney v.

State v. Brown

366 N.C. 563 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 7, 2013

Carroll v. . Brown

228 N.C. 636 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 24, 1948

Bessire & Co. v. Ward, 206 N. C., 858 , 175 S. E., 208 ; Wilson v. Allsbrook, 203 N. C., 498 , 166 S. E., 313 . … Brown, were then engaged. In the case of Ripple v. Stevenson, 223 N. C., 284 , 25 S.

Brown v. Jackson

179 N.C. 363 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 31, 1920

Brown, J. … R. v. Spencer, 166 N. C., 522 .

State v. Brown

366 N.C. 565 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 7, 2013

Newton v. Brown

134 N.C. 439 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 22, 1904

Brown, Jr., another entry being made by II. A. Brown, Jr., and the third by defendant A. W. Taylor. They allege that in respect to the first entry the defendant II. A. … Ruffin, J., in State v. Bevers, supra, says that they were subject to entry, but that by tbe act of 1872 they were ceded to tbe Board of Education.

Brown v. . Martin

176 N.C. 31 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 11, 1918

EL Hooker, testified: “I issued a warrant for Hezekiah Brown, charging him with taking some money of Mr. D. U. Martin. Mr. Martin was, the prosecutor in that warrant. Mr. Thompson was attorney for him”; and Mr. … The rule is established in Stanford v. Grocery Co., 143 N.

Beaufort County Board of Education v. Beaufort County Board of Commissioners

363 N.C. 500 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 28, 2009

The trial' court entered a judgment requiring the County Commission to appropriate that amount to the School Board. On appeal, the Court of Appeals found no error. Beaufort Cty. Bd. of Educ. v. Beaufort Cty. … Perry v. Stancil, 237 N.C. 442, 444 , 75 S.E.2d 512, 514 (1953).

McEwan v. . Brown

176 N.C. 249 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 23, 1918

BROWN, J., took no part in the decision of this case. … Brown, produced it and testified that it was lodged with him for safe-keeping.

Geer v. . Brown

126 N.C. 238 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 27, 1900

Stanly v. Baird, 118 N. C., 75 . … And so in Saunders v. Earp, 118 N.

Brown v. . Spray

158 N.C. 44 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1911

That the said board of graded-school trustees shall have the power and they are hereby authorized to select a treasurer of said board, who shall have charge of the proceeds to be derived from the sale of said school bonds … He shall give such bond for the faithful performance of his services as said board may determine, and shall only pay out moneys which may come into his hands upon the-order of the board of trustees.”