Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.34s
190 N.C. 138 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 23, 1925
Walker v. Mebane, 90 N. C., 259 ; Smith v. Bynum, 92 N. C., 108 ; Blake v. Broughton, 107 N. C., 220 ; Hussey v. Hill, 120 N. C., 312 . It was said in Stevens v. Turlington, 186 N. … Collins v. Davis, 132 N. C., 106 ; Hyman v. Devereux, 63 N. C., 626 .”
Cited 9 timesPublished91 N.C. 26 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1884
it the last will and testament of the said Brown. … The counsel for the caveators relied upon the cases of Little v. Lockman, 4 Jones, 494 , and Adams v. Clark, 8 Jones, 56 . We do not controvert the decision in those cases.
Cited 7 timesPublished233 N.C. 617 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 23, 1951
Utley, 223 N.C. 39 , 25 S.E. 2d 195 ; S. v. Boyd, 223 N.C. 79 , 25 S.E. 2d 456 ; Byers v. Byers, 223 N.C. 85 , 25 S.E. 2d 466 ; S. v. Crandall, 225 N.C. 148 , 33 S.E. 2d 861 ; Bruton v. … Reed v. Schenck, supra; Massey v. Belisle, 24 N.C. 170 ; Mann v. Taylor, 49 N.C. 272 ; Clark v. Moore, 126 N.C. 1 , 35 S.E. 137 ; Tate v. Johnson, 148 N.C. 267 , 61 S.E. 741 .
Cited 12 timesPublished135 N.C. 198 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 26, 1904
The point is expressly decided in Carr v. Askew , 94 N.C. 194 . … It was held by this Court in Burke v.
Cited 5 timesPublished165 N.C. 157 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 18, 1914
Lynch v. Melton, 150 N. C., 595 ; 27 L. N. S., 773; Fellowes v. Durfey, 163 N. C., 305 . … Baird v. Baird, 42 N. C., 266 ; 40 Cyc., 1417.
Cited 11 timesPublished197 N.C. 508 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 9, 1929
Smith v. Smith, 173 N. C., 124 ; Robeson v. Moore, 168 N. C., 388 . It is the meaning given it by this Court in the construction of a deed. Edgerton v. Aycock, 123 N. C., 134 . … J., in Dupree v. Dupree, 45 N.
Cited 12 timesPublishedBeaufort County Board of Education v. Beaufort County Board of Commissioners
363 N.C. 500 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 28, 2009
The trial' court entered a judgment requiring the County Commission to appropriate that amount to the School Board. On appeal, the Court of Appeals found no error. Beaufort Cty. Bd. of Educ. v. Beaufort Cty. … Perry v. Stancil, 237 N.C. 442, 444 , 75 S.E.2d 512, 514 (1953).
Cited 23 timesPublished170 N.C. 253 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 17, 1915
Brown, qualified as his administrator in 1875, and filed his final account in 1876. It is alleged, and there is proof to show it, that the judgment of W. M. B. Brown, (257) admr., v. J. J. Perkins, was assigned by L. V. … JUSTICE BROWN did not sit during the argument of this case and took no part in the decision. *Page 326 Cited: Brown v. Harding , 171 N.C. 686 , Petition to rehear denied; Marler v.
Cited 9 timesPublished229 N.C. 406 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1948
E. 319 ; Copney v. Paries, 212 N. C. 217 , 193 S. E. 21 ; and that, hence, the motion for judgment on the pleadings must be considered in the light of the common law. … See Williams v. Mfg. Co., 153 N. C. 7 , 69 S. E. 902 , and Tarpley v. Arnold, 226 N. C. 679 , 40 S. E. (2) 33.
Cited 5 timesPublished127 N.C. 51 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 16, 1900
The attention of the Court was called to the case of Jones v. Britton, 102 N. C., 166 . The facts in the case before us do not make it necessary to review that case; but it will be observed that Jones v.
Cited 3 timesPublished124 N.C. 292 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 28, 1899
Norwood v. Morrow, 20 N. C., 448 . … McCormick v. Monroe, 46 N. C., 13 .
Cited 5 timesPublished335 N.C. 477 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 28, 1994
See State v. Daniel, 333 N.C. 756 , 429 S.E.2d 724 (1993); State v. Jennings, 333 N.C. 579 , 430 S.E.2d 188 , cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 L. Ed. 2d 602 (1993); State v. … State v. Rhinehart, 324 N.C. 310, 315 , 377 S.E.2d 746, 749 (1989); State v. Davis, 291 N.C. 1, 14 , 229 S.E.2d 285, 294 (1976); State v. Bailey, 254 N.C. 380, 386 , 119 S.E.2d 165, 170 (1961).
Cited 25 timesPublished218 N.C. 368 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1940
The question thus sought to be presented is decided by this Court in Bond Co. v. Krider, ante, 361. The decision in that case is controlling. … As the defendant Brown was permitted t0‘ remain at large under the bond until the second Monday of the court, his failure to appear constitutes a forfeiture thereof. S. v. Staley, 200 N. C., 385 , 157 S. E., 25 .
Cited 6 timesPublished135 N.C. 10 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 12, 1904
Hines v. Mercer, 125 N. C., 71 , is not in point, for there the subsequently acquired land did not come within the terms of the specific devise, and, besides, there was a residuary clause. … Lyon v. Lyon, 96 N. C., 439 . There is no doubtful boundary to render the number of acres material to be considered, as in Cox v. Cox, 91 N. C., 256 . Error.
Cited 8 timesPublished226 N.C. 681 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 6, 1946
S. v. Elder, 217 N. C., 111 , 6 S. E. (2d), 840 . In any event we tbink tbe evidence was immaterial on tbe issue of bis guilt or innocence of tbe offense charged. … S. v. Hargrove, 216 N. C., 570 , 5 S. E. (2d), 852 ; S. v. Jones, 182 N. C., 781 , 108 S. E., 376 . Nor do we find prejudicial error in tbe portion excepted to.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna